Love you Daniel. lol 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 12:16:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829131054529052975
Reply addressees: @DRolandAnderson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829127408483750174
Source: Twitter X
-
(“woke sequence” not “work sequence”. I make enough typos on my own. I don’t nee
(“woke sequence” not “work sequence”. I make enough typos on my own. I don’t need help from ‘autocorrect’. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 12:00:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829127007466045768
Reply addressees: @SteveSailorMan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829126259999166909
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
–“5% of women on X behave this way. I believe Curt is wrong. I think it’s a sign of an immature woman not all women.”– Stephen Smith (@SteveSailorMan)
Yes, it’s a sign of immature women in particular, and Women on x behaving this way demonstrate high neuroticism – what we’d expect.
However, all women, under pressure, will at least demonstrate some fraction of this behavior, as will a minority of cognitively feminine men. Almost all women demonstrate the naxalt-axalt fallacy. And a supermajority demonstrate the inversion of true-false with desirable-undesirable.
But this argument requires context: Please remember that I am trying to explain the origins and ‘logic’ of the feminine > abrahamic > marxist-sequence of seditions that constitute the feminine means of antisocial behavior, underming, sedition, and treason.
So my ’emphasis’ serves the purpose of attempting to sensitize the audience of followers, their friends, and associates such that they learn to both identify it, and most importantly, realize it is an instinctual response that can be given voice as a pretense of argument using the feminine > abrahamic > marxist sequence – yet that we can suppress that antisociality and criminality just as we have that of violence with the law. The problem is male antisociality is obvious, but female antisociality is seditious and incremental, which we can see from the evolution of the feminist movement on one hand, and the evolution of the cultural marxist to race marxist to work sequence on the other.
Affections
CDOriginal post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1829126259999166909
-
I don’t just think it’s false I know it is
I don’t just think it’s false I know it is.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 11:58:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829126563079536850
Reply addressees: @ProphetOfHelios
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829105690947850287
-
“5% of women on X behave this way. I believe Curt is wrong. I think it’s a sign
–“5% of women on X behave this way. I believe Curt is wrong. I think it’s a sign of an immature woman not all women.”– Stephen Smith (@SteveSailorMan)
Yes, it’s a sign of immature women in particular, and Women on x behaving this way demonstrate high neuroticism – what we’d expect.
However, all women, under pressure, will at least demonstrate some fraction of this behavior, as will a minority of cognitively feminine men. Almost all women demonstrate the naxalt-axalt fallacy. And a supermajority demonstrate the inversion of true-false with desirable-undesirable.
But this argument requires context: Please remember that I am trying to explain the origins and ‘logic’ of the feminine > abrahamic > marxist-sequence of seditions that constitute the feminine means of antisocial behavior, underming, sedition, and treason.
So my ’emphasis’ serves the purpose of attempting to sensitize the audience of followers, their friends, and associates such that they learn to both identify it, and most importantly, realize it is an instinctual response that can be given voice as a pretense of argument using the feminine > abrahamic > marxist sequence – yet that we can suppress that antisociality and criminality just as we have that of violence with the law. The problem is male antisociality is obvious, but female antisociality is seditious and incremental, which we can see from the evolution of the feminist movement on one hand, and the evolution of the cultural marxist to race marxist to work sequence on the other.
Affections
CDReply addressees: @SteveSailorMan
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 11:57:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829126259768504321
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829121508062425191
-
RT @bierlingm: And you should never apologize for or detest this privilege. Priv
RT @bierlingm: And you should never apologize for or detest this privilege.
Privilege just means that your parents and ancestors invested…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 10:28:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829103868988301443
-
RT @DegenRolf: “Wokeness has a stronger correlation with anxiety than with depre
RT @DegenRolf: “Wokeness has a stronger correlation with anxiety than with depression.” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/sjop.13065?campaign=wolearlyview Many studies have found tha…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 10:28:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829103797718692082
-
)
😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 10:22:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829102260795621818
Reply addressees: @AbleDParyon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1829101722498683345
-
Worse
Worse
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 02:00:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828975913737818400
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828890470992257521
-
RT @ExponentialApe: This felt like a @Breedlove22 conversation with John Vervaek
RT @ExponentialApe: This felt like a @Breedlove22 conversation with John Vervaeke’s darker alter ego @curtdoolittle.
It definitely got pr…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-29 01:58:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828975470563434503
-
Lawyer ‘friend’ just volunteered to help me load my car for the trip to the west
Lawyer ‘friend’ just volunteered to help me load my car for the trip to the west coast. In my condition it was a godsend. This guy is a saint really. There are good lawyers who are good moral people. They just avoid cases where they have to deal with bad people. Then there are lawyers who are bad people in the first place or become them in order to make money or win at all costs. We need to end those people in the profession forever.
And I’m working on it.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-28 18:12:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1828858195642630144