RT @pmarca: “The Op” spreads “The Message”. https://youtu.be/WxFlOd2zOR8
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-05 01:18:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831502156454883652
RT @pmarca: “The Op” spreads “The Message”. https://youtu.be/WxFlOd2zOR8
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-05 01:18:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831502156454883652
RT @pmarca: The Op is destroying the institutions that run it. They should stop, and they should stop now. https://t.co/UbyegndY8H
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-05 01:18:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831502109902303283
RT @curtdoolittle: @OtonielFilho5 –“Q: CURT: Historically, what were England’s biggest mistakes?”–
They only really made a few:
1) Not…
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 23:35:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831476191448244333
RT @curtdoolittle: THE MORALITY OF ANGLO COLONIALISM?
Review of Colonialism: A Moral Reckoning by Nigel Biggar. Written by TJ Grant (7/23)…
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 23:35:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831476154538324087
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Both instinct and intuition lose their edge without nature’s feedback.
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 22:36:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831461397982801964
How can you make any claims if you don’t know the literature. I’ve been at this for forty years. The equilibration of the sexes was obtained by increasing the verbal pictoiral and decreasing the mathematical.
The suppression of boys is in the literature. Just look for it.
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 21:34:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831445829019955292
Reply addressees: @jess_ann_pin @ememess
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831378866306175357
I can’t translate that into anything vaguely approaching scientific terms although I suspect you could give examples and I could infer the meaning from them.
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 21:33:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831445493802729963
Reply addressees: @jess_ann_pin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831379515043717255
Conforming to WHAT?
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 21:32:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831445308913676472
Reply addressees: @jess_ann_pin @truthb4face @ememess
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831380306794049564
Natural Law is the premise that human cooperation can be reduced to a scientific description from which we can codify law (constitution, legislation, findings of the court) such that it is consistent with that science.
Aristotle of course begins it. The christians appropriated it claiming divine instead of natural origin. By the time of Aquinas he has integrated it, and by the time of the founders it’s reduced to clarity by Blackstone. My work, our organization’s work, begins with behavioral economics and cognitive science and computational linguistics to restate that law in scientific terms, and to point out the holes in the constitution that were left unfilled allowing the marxist – leninist – neo-marxist- feminist- postmodern – to woke sequence of false promises (Frauds) to undermine the west’s institutionalization of the maximization of individual responsibility in order to produce the high trust polity and cooperative velocity that have outpaced teh rest in the bronze, iron, and steel ages.
Reply addressees: @jess_ann_pin @truthb4face @ememess
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 21:32:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831445219575033857
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831381337191936264
(NLI)
Well, the draft of the introduction is done. Ready for editing. 😉
Only ‘Dunno’ I have is the location of The Method, which could go before Truth and perhaps ought to. https://t.co/PmDR6wtIlH

Source date (UTC): 2024-09-04 21:09:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1831439522258940307