Source: Twitter X

Thanks for pointing me to this chain of tweets.
1) @xxclusionary’s points are solid all along and it’s well written.
2) However the reasons for collapse have been known and consistent for 2500 years. We just ignore and deny them because ‘this time is different’ etc.
3) I don’t have time to respond thoroughly because I’m having a writing-day today and I need to get the work done on this chapter. That said I can say a few things.
a) constitutions, legislatures, and courts need a system of measurement sufficient for the suppression of criminality across teh spectrum, from the most base to the most subtle, abstract, and diffuse – like credentialism, rent seeking, seditions, false promises, and baiting into hazards.
b) economies cannot consist of a monopoly means of cooperation any more than a market can consist of monopolies. WE require at least three economic models for the three major classes that suits their different abilities, costs, and returns.
c) Participatory government is not bad per se as long as the system of measurement prohibits funding of hazards. So the people who can vote must be limited to those who demonstrate responsibility AND the resulting legislation must not violate enablement of irresponsibiliy.
d) The problem we face is reducible to the entry of women into voting and the work force combined with vulnerabilties in our religion, our culture, our traditional, common, and constitutional law, that were exploited by the movement of jewish marxist intellectuals from europe to the USA largely via the frankfurt school, and their conversion of class marxism to sex cultural and race marxism which has been decidedly successful.

All these issues are easily fixed with the power to legislate moral laws to prevent them. We’ve done the work to draft the laws. We would need some means of forcing their assent. And I don’t see that happening without some sort of conflict.

Reply addressees: @Archaic3one @xxclusionary @whatifalthist @ThruTheHayes @ItIsHoeMath @Tysenberg