Source: Twitter X

  • Q: CURT: –“Why aren’t you more bullish on china?”– I might be bullish on the c

    Q: CURT: –“Why aren’t you more bullish on china?”–

    I might be bullish on the chinese population, but IQ is a resource that requires institutions to express. The CCP like the Russian elites are prohibitive institutions, and both countries are astoundingly poor outside of ‘Potemkin Cities” because of it.

    I was optimistic for both as they pursued market economies, but the competition by the rising productive classes was a threat to the rent seeking of the established elites in russia and ‘princes’ in china.

    The forgiving interpretation is that both are empires with productive cores, but ruling over vastly unproductive territories vulnerable to central asian hordes (now islam) and that they correctly need to maintain control to prevent the spread of bad ideas, bad culture, and bad genes, as well as the rise of competitors who like their ancestors will resort to raiding and war to compensate for the incapacity of their land to produce incomes.

    The world has not come around yet to the obvious conclusion that there is only one bad actor on the planet – that is islam. The rest of the planet is maturing into modernity a bit painfully but rather rapidly and to its benefit. Were it not for oil under the middle east the remaining civilizations would all treat islam as a belligerent africa to be contained. The benefit of non-muslim africa is that it’s actually doing just fine. Islam is not.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 17:21:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866896126236073984

  • THE PROCESS OF MUSLIM DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION THROUGH IMMIGRATION AND REPROD

    THE PROCESS OF MUSLIM DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION THROUGH IMMIGRATION AND REPRODUCTION
    (“The process of destroying Lebanon, a formerly prosperous and 65% christian country, was achieved in only forty to fifty years.”)

    In “Slavery, Terrorism & Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat,” Dr. Peter Hammond examines the influence of growing Muslim populations on societal structures. He proposes a correlation between the percentage of Muslims in a population and corresponding societal changes:

    Under 2%: Muslims are perceived as a peace-loving minority and not a threat to other citizens.

    2% to 5%: Proselytization efforts increase, targeting other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, with significant recruitment from prisons and street gangs.

    Above 5%: There is a push for the introduction of halal food standards, influencing major food chains and supermarkets.

    Reaching 10%: Increased lawlessness and unrest occur, often as a form of protest against perceived societal issues.

    At 20%: Expectation of hair-trigger rioting, formation of jihad militias, sporadic killings, and the burning of religious buildings.

    Around 40%: Nations may experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.

    From 60%: Unfettered persecution of non-believers, sporadic ethnic cleansing, implementation of Sharia law as a weapon, and imposition of jizya (tax on infidels).

    Above 80%: Daily intimidation, violent jihad, state-run ethnic cleansing, and efforts to drive out infidels, moving toward a 100% Muslim society.

    At 100%: Theoretically ushers in ‘Dar-es-Salaam’—the Islamic House of Peace—where the society is entirely Muslim, and Sharia law prevails.

    Dr. Hammond’s analysis suggests that as the Muslim population increases, there is a corresponding rise in demands for Islamic practices and laws, which can lead to societal tensions and conflicts. He emphasizes that these patterns are observable in various countries with significant Muslim populations.

    For a comprehensive understanding, refer to Dr. Hammond’s book, which includes detailed chapters and appendices on the spread of Islam, a glossary of Islamic terms, and guidelines for Muslim evangelism.

    https://t.co/mTNAFuWvYH?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 17:12:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866893882073681923

  • RT @WalterIII: I never tire of thinking about this and the Jewish question. Grok

    RT @WalterIII: I never tire of thinking about this and the Jewish question.

    Grok, what does @curtdoolittle ‘s Table of Grammars tell us?…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 09:26:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866776486629478674

  • Why do you blame white people when your people are a fraction of the population,

    Why do you blame white people when your people are a fraction of the population, are the least self regulating of the races, commit an absurdly disproportionate amount of crime, and kill an equally disproportionate number of white people? Fix your people. You and yours are the problem. Fix your families. Fix your discipline. Fix your culture. If necessary get back into religion. And don’t blame whites for economic disparities given the standard deviation of difference in intelligence – something that is only going to get worse as increasing percentages of your population are unable to self regulate, behave, and learn behaviors that are necessary for survival in a modern economies. The problem for black people is the person you see when you look in the mirror. Fix yourselves.

    Reply addressees: @JamaalBowmanNY


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 00:33:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866642331711197184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866552100995428779

  • (Gross)

    (Gross)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 19:04:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866559511500296512

    Reply addressees: @HeSeesWhatYouDo @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866547200148521355

  • IMO: BTC down to 95 is just profit taking and EOY. 150k in 2025 is more likely t

    IMO: BTC down to 95 is just profit taking and EOY.
    150k in 2025 is more likely than not.

    I’m not a crypto-bro. Just looking at the macro environment.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 19:03:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866559352565547416

  • Done

    Done


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 18:35:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866552327068586169

    Reply addressees: @orion_pulse @tunguz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866535533813567781

  • Or quanta are discrete because of marginal differences necessary for the formati

    Or quanta are discrete because of marginal differences necessary for the formation of stable relations and therefore we can describe them digitally (operationally) rather than analog. Yet brcause wo lack knowledge we can only describe their continuous behavior in time mathematically because mathematics is limited to the statistical despite all operations being described computationally.

    Reply addressees: @tunguz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 18:35:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866552292184559616

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866528309326283028

  • RT @JakeFis64057669: @The_Kyle_Mann

    RT @JakeFis64057669: @The_Kyle_Mann https://t.co/AGLArrsgqC


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 16:40:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866523515383583208

  • That’s a good thing

    That’s a good thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 16:40:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866523424102945233

    Reply addressees: @BigmamaDolcea @The_Kyle_Mann

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866287090549362833