Hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 19:20:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867650895607144857
Reply addressees: @AnthonyBrink_SA
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867644461406466125
Hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 19:20:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867650895607144857
Reply addressees: @AnthonyBrink_SA
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867644461406466125
–“The world is full of monsters. Sooner or later we all take our turn.”– Anon
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 19:20:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867650842054340956
Yes I understand but for the purposes of the tweet that would require i add an additional argument.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:54:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867644258133606437
Reply addressees: @AnthonyBrink_SA
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867643636822786291
RT @curtdoolittle: WHAT DOES JAMES LINDSAY MEAN BY “THE WOKE RIGHT”?
(cc: @ConceptualJames)
TL/DR;
a) Lindsay is correct that beginning…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:51:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867643590593450025
People will respond to markets. The “broken boys” of the right are a very bad market.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:51:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867643475426259264
Reply addressees: @pundasdad @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867642688218050917
Understood. I work in testimony, reciprocity, and their opposites of lying and irreciprocity. So I reduce human behaviors to their first principles (science, causality) rather than analogy. THis allows for the ability to make judgements that are neutral (true and reciprocal vs false and irreciprocal) without emotional loading and framing that most people, the left, and lindsay in particular must rely upon.
Reply addressees: @JRuebl47185 @ConceptualJames
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:43:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867641550278471681
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867638610499186724
RUDYARD AND JAMES LINDSAY VS THE STREISAND EFFECT
I wouldn’t overstate the US and world shift until it’s taken root. The swing is always back and forth.
That said:
Rudyard is close friend and a true believer in religion with a bias in favor of the medieval period. But, he has the most intellectual potential of any of the young people I can find, because while he may be biased, he’s not anchored and fearful of adaptation as he learns – which you can see in his slow and gradual addressing of this issue. So I give him the benefit of the doubt, and wait for him to develop on his own terms at his own rate. But that said, I know my job is judicial (negativa) and his is evangelical (positiva). Both sides of the coin are necessary for human societies.
I view Lindsay as what I said: a good book reviewer, an exceptional advocate and communicator, a center leftist, and otherwise, as an intellectual, unnecessarily a poser (I think it’s a class issue myself). I would have much more optimistic view of him – because he’s still relatively young – if he wasn’t compensating with (hiding behind) arrogance and feminine ridicule, and instead stating his current position and being open to his future evolution.
cc: @whatifalthist , @ConceptualJames
Reply addressees: @pundasdad @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:39:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867640565309091843
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867626971662102541
(very smart statement)
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:22:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867636231112409505
Reply addressees: @femboy_swift @PeterZeihan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867618887124365499
What are you suggesting? That I should have gone into more detail, rather than just countering the usual right wing nonsense?
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 17:39:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867625331039121515
Reply addressees: @AnthonyBrink_SA
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867623357803270382
No James, the difference is that you’re using feminine-abrahamic-marxist-leftist undermining and canceling by term abuse and labeling because you can’t make a rational and empirical argument other than the pretense of a vague analogy to gnosticism – which itself is neither a rational nor empirical but fictionalist analogy rather than argument.
All humans act rationally and all human actions are rationally and neutrally explicable. If you can’t do that what you’re doing instead is manipulation, sedition, and propaganda.
You’re going to bury yourself on this hill (again) so why attempt to create a false equivalencing by conflating that the right is correct and the left is not?
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 17:26:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867622128444665856
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867592431572533372