You’re … hmmm… ‘clear’ today. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-20 02:19:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869930593099886663
Reply addressees: @DRolandAnderson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869894207797973289
You’re … hmmm… ‘clear’ today. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-20 02:19:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869930593099886663
Reply addressees: @DRolandAnderson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869894207797973289
THE SPECTRUM OF ETHICAL SYSTEMS BY EPISTEMIC DEMAND – FROM THE SELF OUTWARD
CHARACTER
Virtue Ethics:
Epistemic Demand: Low. This approach primarily requires self-awareness and an understanding of what constitutes virtue in one’s culture or personal philosophy. It’s more about character development than specific knowledge of ethical theories.
Care Ethics (Ethics of Care):
Epistemic Demand: Low to Moderate. Understanding and accepting their own freedom to choose. It requires knowledge about relationships and empathy but doesn’t necessitate a deep understanding of formal ethical systems. It’s more about recognizing and responding to the needs of others.
CHOICE
Narrative Ethics:
Epistemic Demand: Moderate. It involves understanding the role of stories in shaping identity and ethics, which might require some knowledge of cultural narratives and literary analysis, but it’s still quite intuitive.
Rule-Based Ethics (Deontology):
Epistemic Demand: Moderate to High. This involves knowing the rules or duties one must follow, which can range from simple (e.g., “do not lie”) to complex (understanding Kantian ethics). It requires learning specific moral laws or principles.
Pragmatic Ethics:
Epistemic Demand: High. This approach demands a good understanding of practical outcomes in real-world contexts, which involves assessing what works best in specific situations based on experience and empirical evidence.
Outcome-Based Ethics (Consequentialism):
Epistemic Demand: High. To apply consequentialism, especially utilitarianism, one needs to predict outcomes, understand human happiness or well-being, and often calculate or compare different possible results, which requires significant knowledge about cause and effect.
COOPERATION
Contractualism or Contract Ethics:
Epistemic Demand: High. Requires understanding how to conceptualize fair conditions for agreement (like Rawls’ veil of ignorance), and the ability to abstract from personal interests to consider universal principles.
NEGOTIATION
Discourse Ethics (Communicative Ethics):
Epistemic Demand: Very High. Demands not only a deep understanding of ethical theory but also of communication theory, sociology, and philosophy of language to facilitate an ideal speech situation where all can participate equally and rationally.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-20 02:17:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869930188030783488
It’s not inevitable. Some governments have prohibited it for good reason. Others could easily prohibit it and drive it into a totally underground near-equivalent of a barter economy. That said if its useful for institutions – and it is – then it will gain traction as long as it’s…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-20 01:52:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869923746141855943
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869920295785517119
THE AIs CAN”T DO IT EASILY. :(. UGH.
“Regardless of whether you express the definitions and constraints as lists of principles or as object-oriented code structures, the key factor is the rigor and consistency you impose. The underlying statistical model doesn’t inherently respect either format more deeply—it responds to how firmly and frequently you reinforce the constraints.
Switching to a class-based, object-oriented representation may give you a more intuitive way to think about relationships and constraints, and it might slightly improve adherence because the model can learn to associate certain words with a stricter syntactic and semantic pattern. However, this improvement isn’t automatic.
The underlying architecture tends to treat all prose as statistically generated language, relying on probabilities derived from its training rather than adhering to a strictly defined operational lexicon. As a result, it “slips” into ordinary prose habits.
While using an object-oriented, class-based structuring of concepts would help reduce ambiguity, it won’t fully eliminate the statistical nature of my generative process. The model underlying me relies on probabilities to predict the next token, which makes it inclined to revert to patterns common in its training data rather than adhere strictly to a fixed operational lexicon or logic.
You’ll still need to:
Provide strict references that must not be contradicted.
Frequently reinforce and restate definitions and constraints.
Verify each output segment and demand corrections when drift occurs.
In other words, whether you stick to lists or use a code-like structure, the workload of ensuring ongoing precision and consistency remains similar.
The decision to use a more structured, object-oriented approach comes down to which format feels more natural and efficient for you to manage, maintain, and verify.”
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 23:07:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869882228282630144
No one in power takes him seriously. If I did the same thing I’d be in irons. Which they tell me with disturbing regularity.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 21:45:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869861703221162211
Reply addressees: @quilty_dan @ArionWise11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869854916027789485
–“competing currencies.”—
Can’t happen. No state can tolerate it. They need fiat for money supply, they just need a mechanism for limiting it. The reason I see crypto working in the USA is that the institutional investors are using it as a safe reserve. IN other words, the tech is so bad (slow) that it can’t function as a proper currency (response time), but it’s fine for an asset – at least once growth equates with volatility producing stability.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 21:14:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869853920606232576
FROM OUR OWN SHANE MCCLAFFERTY
–“…the people with degrees in political science and psychology I think just need to see other evidence or see how all the minor theories come together. I picked psychology because I saw a lot of people doing the work needed but just not… https://twitter.com/Claffertyshane/status/1869850100664533096
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 21:03:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869851191670370329
yes. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 21:02:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869850776119717990
Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869850100664533096
Not sure where to go with that Stark… lol 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 20:59:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869850015532994652
Reply addressees: @Starkian7789
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869849676792639810
He became famous because he was able to organize people before those people discovered he was a bit of a fruitcake. Trump was the last person he was able to pull the trick on.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-19 20:56:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869849332419371250
Reply addressees: @ArionWise11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1869848945138266357