Great question. I’ll answer it. (Tired)
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 02:34:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873195796843380876
Reply addressees: @BOB37702515
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873126090488856725
Great question. I’ll answer it. (Tired)
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 02:34:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873195796843380876
Reply addressees: @BOB37702515
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873126090488856725
good.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-29 02:31:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873195026752380954
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873159881974530135
(well done)
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 21:22:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873117235323306377
Reply addressees: @PatrociniuMundi
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873109684170686925
I can’t confirm these hypotheses because the past few years have cast doubt on the chinese data – largely because it comes almost entirely from certain urban areas. I also can’t confirm the distribution (though it seems logical). So I go with what I have to work with.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 21:19:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873116540608102689
Reply addressees: @BigSisterCynthi
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873109842703073585
RT @PatrociniuMundi: Some form of Curt’s recommendation is the only feasible middle ground in this debate, given that:
(a) We take for gran…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 21:03:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873112478718271957
They’re going to have problems but even with half the population they still have the same population as the states.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 20:04:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873097706421579820
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873097244150464980
1) Technically it’s 140s to invent competitive science, tech, engineering etc, 130s to manage scale organizations or write meaningful books, 120s to design machines and machine parts. Everyone else is some degree of labor. With everyone below about 95 increasingly dead weight.
2) Average IQ in a population is so influential that it is the only measure necessary – everything else will reflect that IQ relative to other polities.
3) India is a ‘****hole’ because of historical reasons AND IQ. But they are slowly and steadily civilizing. Kind of impressed at the progress just since 2000.
Reply addressees: @BOB37702515
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 20:03:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873097439357616129
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873092061605576909
THE ANSWER TO THE H1B DEBATE?
(a) US colleges are selecting against white males.
(b) US colleges are selecting in favor of foreigners b/c $.
(c) The IQ distribution in China means that with a much larger population they will produce as many +130 as the USA and Europe combined.
(d) The IQ distribution in India means that while they produce around the same total +130, they are more likely to pursue USA jobs given the asymmetry of rewards.
(e) Net is that we (the west) do not produce enough +130 to compete in science and tech without SUPPLEMENTING our +130 with theirs.
(f) Policy must be:
– i) to exhaust the US supply before including foreign students in colleges and universities,
– ii) and Visa must be limited to top talent,
– iii) and birthright citizenship and chain migration must be prohibited.
As in all things demographics drive everything.
That’s my understanding of the data.
Thanks
CD
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 19:22:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873087085546225665
i/o = Trust your research. Any pointers appreciated.
As for the H1B issue:
(a) US colleges are selecting against white males.
(b) US colleges are selecting in favor of foreigners b/c $.
(c) The IQ distribution in China means that with a much larger population they will produce as many +130 as the USA and Europe combined.
(d) The IQ distribution in India means that while they produce around the same total +130, they are more likely to pursue USA jobs given the asymmetry of rewards.
(e) Net is that we (the west) do not produce enough +130 to compete in science and tech without SUPPLEMENTING our +130 with theirs.
(f) Policy must be i) to exhaust the US supply before including foreign students in colleges and universities, ii) and Visa must be limited to top talent, iii) and birthright citizenship and chain migration must be prohibited.
That’s my understanding of the data.
Thanks
CD
Reply addressees: @eyeslasho
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 19:20:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873086564991156225
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873058565226938523
Combating U.S. Propaganda https://youtube.com/shorts/Hea72TJ44rA?si=woU16LTFdLcvy3Pl
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-28 19:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1873084789210923360