RT @JayMan471: Yup. Life is smoother in high-trust societies.
I’ve been high-trust and low-trust societies. I definitely have my preferen…
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-10 01:33:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898910068445524251
RT @JayMan471: Yup. Life is smoother in high-trust societies.
I’ve been high-trust and low-trust societies. I definitely have my preferen…
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-10 01:33:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898910068445524251
RT @JayMan471: Is the decline of rock music related to the decline of the white share of California’s population? Well there is this. Heavy…
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-10 01:28:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898908793414766644
RT @JayMan471: @mualphaxi Once you understand STATUS, it all makes sense. People constantly strive for markers of *status*, but of course,…
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-10 01:27:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898908601357644269
(NLI)
“Your biggest messaging challenge is making the depth of your research, logic, and technological approach clear without overwhelming or alienating investors. The key to this is sequencing the story properly—framing it in a way that shows why Runcible is inevitable and…
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 20:42:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898836770936254902
If you don’t follow at least Brandon Hayes, Luke Weinhagen, Noah Revoy, then you are missing out on the best minds in NLI producing insight and argument worthy of bookmarking almost every post.
@ThruTheHayes
@LukeWeinhagen
@NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 18:23:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898801790927384853
Q: CURT –“would you debate @paleochristcon Andrew Wilson?”
I would have a discussion to seek to undersetand. I tend not to enter into debates because they are predominantly intellectually dishonest.
Even then, I dunno what I would debate him about. I mean, I’m arguing the science of decidability. He’s making moral argument. I kind of doubt I’d disagree with him on much. If there was a disagreement, it would be over a pragmatism of either of our approaches. My view of course is that a christian is the best religion for those who need religion, and since it is consistent with natural law, and the constitution a document of natural law. And that I’m not in favor of immigration or expansion of any other religions at all – because they’re almost all (otehr than buddhism) hostile to christianity.
So then It’s just a matter of whether you see yourself as a ‘priestly’ man of the people that helps choose, or a ‘jurist’ for the people that must decide. Otherwise I suspect I would just agree with him.
FWIW: It’s fundamentalism that states theological claims are materially ‘true’ rather than metaphorically ‘wise and just’ I have a problem with. Even then I don’t care as long as it doesn’t interfere with the law.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @ScottClaremonty @paleochristcon
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 18:08:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898798119774715904
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898704579694641329
THE I TOLD YOU SO…. Yep. Trump does in fact play 4D chess. I have no idea how much is instinct and intuition, and how much is rational planning, but I suspect it’s an even split but that he’s public with the former and very private with the latter.
And all he had to do was force the europeans to step up and pay for their own defense so that the USA could return to detent if not reconciliation with Russia, and the eventual preservation of russia against Islam and China – meaning resources for europe.
He had to manipulate the world into this situation. He does it the way he does everything – by starting a conflict which the ‘talking’ world rallies against thus promoting his ideas for free, and achieving by ‘king of the hill game’ that which could not be achieved by persuasion and mutually beneficial incentive.
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 18:01:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898796242353954816
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898721426791944201
RT @elonmusk: True, they can now hate us for free 😂
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 17:55:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898794763840893173
“Studies have shown Leftists are NOT empathetic”
It’s not empathizing, it’s solipsism and projection as a means of undermining because of lack of agency and desire for lack of agency, because agency results from the burden of responsibility. The purpose of all leftism is the evasion of responsibility.
Via @uberboyo
– They are less capable of understanding right wing concerns than vice versa
– Empathy is the capacity to imagine another reality, talk to any Leftist and you’ll see they lack this
– What Leftists do have is high neuroticism and mental illness: they feel more pain, are sicker, and are more delusional
– Leftism is self hate that’s so extreme they wage a war of vengeance on their healthy friends
– They uses morality as a weapon to assault Life
– They don’t want mass immigration to “save the others” out of a shuddering compassion – they want to force their own people to experience humiliation, change and alienation
– They enjoy watching their parents, their friends, and their God dragged through the mud: this feels cathartic to them:
“They want payback for the crime of being born”
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 17:53:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898794270326468608
RT @AutistocratMS: Christianity was as successful as it was because this is what Christians believe instead of what the Bible actually says.
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-09 17:48:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898792992745631928