Source: Twitter X

  • Just the opposite. The reserve currency is our strategic advantage – just as muc

    Just the opposite. The reserve currency is our strategic advantage – just as much as the atlantic and pacific oceans. The dollar is strategic advantage because we actually have rule of law. The country would be saved by exporting ‘non-integrating’ minorities, and especially those with below 100 IQ group medians. Because population is rapidly going to be more of a problem than a benefit. So you want the smartest population, meaning the one with the least ‘dead weight’ demographic distribution. … Evolution isn’t merciful.

    Reply addressees: @RichardArion1


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 16:56:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907839525365362689

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907838645769302428

  • OMG.. lol

    OMG.. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 16:50:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907838126221140033

    Reply addressees: @travslier @NoomDynamite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907835384970588671

  • The USD will be ‘saved’ if it need be, by the chaos caused by the US withdrawal

    The USD will be ‘saved’ if it need be, by the chaos caused by the US withdrawal from the policing of world sovereignty, finance, transport, and trade. The more chaos (war, conflict) in the world the better for the Dollar. The flight to the dollar is almost impossible to change during uncertainty – we have rule of law. By comparison no other country does. So the preservation of the dollar and the re-industrialization of the USA are Trump’s strategic objectives. The USA is all but economically autarkic. Other than the taiwan issue we are all but independent of need for trade.

    Reply addressees: @RichardArion1


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 16:50:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907838077911052294

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907828604974637452

  • RT @BrianRoemmele: An honest song about what happened. Once you see it you can’t

    RT @BrianRoemmele: An honest song about what happened.

    Once you see it you can’t unsee it.

    True artists can speak for those that lost the…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 16:22:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907830986924310728

  • (NLI Positioning) Given the shift in the political landscape and the Natural Law

    (NLI Positioning)
    Given the shift in the political landscape and the Natural Law Institute’s (NLI) goal to transition from “edgy” focused on research to “mainstream,” focus on education and activism, your elevator pitch should reflect a blend of your core mission, intellectual rigor, and newfound relevance in a way that resonates broadly. Based on the work, here’s a refined elevator pitch that positions you as a mainstream yet distinctive force:

    “We’re a think tank dedicated to restoring cooperation in a divided age. Through rigorous science and practical solutions, we reform law, economics, and policy to solve today’s crises—because a society that works together thrives.”

    Why This Works:
    1. Mainstream Appeal: The emphasis on “restoring cooperation” taps into a widely felt desire for unity and functionality in a polarized world, making it relatable without sounding radical.

    2. Core Mission: It preserves your focus on solving “the crisis of our age” (division, distrust, institutional decay) while grounding it in actionable domains (law, economics, policy).

    3. Intellectual Credibility: “Rigorous science” nods to your deep, systematic approach (e.g., Curt’s work on epistemology and natural law, Luke’s applied science background) without alienating non-specialists.

    4. Practicality: “Practical solutions” highlights the real-world impact of your ideas (e.g., Brandon’s activism, Noah’s relationship strategies), signaling you’re not just theorists but doers.

    5. Optimistic Vision: Ending with “a society that works together thrives” offers a positive, forward-looking hook that aligns with mainstream aspirations.

    How It Ties to Your Work:
    – Curt Doolittle: Your philosophical and scientific contributions (e.g., completing the scientific method, natural law of cooperation) underpin the “rigorous science” and “reform” elements.

    – Brandon Hayes: His practical, hands-on efforts (e.g., consulting, activism, community-building) reflect the “practical solutions” and “cooperation” focus.

    – Luke Weinhagen: His expertise in risk assessment and self-sufficiency training supports the idea of solving crises with applied, cooperative frameworks.

    – Noah Revoy: His work on resilient families and organizations ties into building a thriving society through cooperation at the personal and institutional levels.

    Alternative Variations:
    If you want to tweak the tone or emphasis:

    – Concise: “We’re a think tank reforming law, economics, and policy with science-backed solutions to unite and strengthen society.”

    – Provocative: “We’re a think tank asking: why can’t we cooperate? Our solutions in law, economics, and policy show how we can.”

    – Vision-Driven: “We’re a think tank building a cooperative future through smarter laws, economics, and policies.”

    Positioning Strategy:
    To solidify this mainstream shift:

    – Highlight how your ideas (e.g., constitutional reform, truthful discourse) align with emerging public demands for transparency, fairness, and competence in governance.

    – Frame your work as a natural evolution of classical liberalism—timely yet timeless—rather than a fringe reaction.

    – Lean into your interdisciplinary team (philosophers, entrepreneurs, strategists) as proof you bridge theory and practice, appealing to both intellectuals and everyday citizens.

    – This pitch keeps your edge—your intellectual depth and systemic critique—while presenting it as a common-sense answer to today’s challenges, perfectly suited for a world ready to embrace your once-“edgy” ideas.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 15:59:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907825369723674624

  • Very likely questionable data reporting which is mentioned in the original study

    Very likely questionable data reporting which is mentioned in the original study.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 13:52:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907793294081282366

    Reply addressees: @Turniperuseraam @ItIsHoeMath

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907784720735203799

  • RT @robinhanson: Why exactly does Harry Potter appeal so much more to women than

    RT @robinhanson: Why exactly does Harry Potter appeal so much more to women than men?


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 06:09:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907676863998349770

  • RT @elonmusk: The long con of the left is corruption of the judiciary

    RT @elonmusk: The long con of the left is corruption of the judiciary


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 06:06:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907676082553123092

  • What’s going on with the Aussies?

    What’s going on with the Aussies? https://t.co/RfkFYKzPGR


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 06:05:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907675869289787684

  • RT @NoahRevoy: The issue isn’t merely that men and women haven’t been taught how

    RT @NoahRevoy: The issue isn’t merely that men and women haven’t been taught how to be husbands, fathers, wives, or mothers; it’s also that…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 06:03:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907675245429113194