Source: Twitter X

  • THE NATURAL LAW OF DECIDABILTY ON THE STATE OF PHYSICS 1) Yes there is a classic

    THE NATURAL LAW OF DECIDABILTY ON THE STATE OF PHYSICS

    1) Yes there is a classical explanation of quantum mechanics using fluid dynamics. 2) Yes an ‘aether’ exists as the quantum background with fluidic properties. 3) The variables aren’t hidden. They were deducible. They weren’t deduced because of a failure permute upon classical explanations in favor of continuing mathematical (non causal) explanations. 4) Yes this ‘mathiness’ set us back because math is only descriptive not causal, and as such, einstein/bohr’s descriptive but non causal adventure with ‘mathiness’ (platonism) was easier to solve than maxwell, lorentz, and hilbert’s ‘physics’ (realism, naturalism, empiricism). 5) No, there is no evidence of non classical existence. We simply do not know if information can be transmitted by other than waves through the background at whatever lower level of resolution that exists that the background evolves from. 6) So we face two problems (a) a set of models rather than a mathematics from which to produce experiments (b) the means of testing the even-smaller to perform these experiments.

    Why? If we study the *instinctual* means of human igorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, magical thinking, fictionalisms, deceits and denials, we can catalogue them, and test hypotheses and theories for engaging in those means of ‘error’ (or lying). (And it’s humiliating to study human lying, and then gaining awareness of how much of our speech consists of lies whether by intent or not. If we search through the history of western *systems* of thought, we find the conflict between the observable and the imaginary in the empiricism of aristotle(epicurus, the stoics et all), and the magical thinking in plato’s idealism as well as in other civilizations as confucian wisdom, supernatural abrahamism, hinduism, and buddhism.

    If we catalogue the sophistries of suggestion (deceit) and overloading by loading, framing, obscuring, fabrication, and the fictionalisms of Emotional: Supernatural->Theology, Verbal: Idealism->Philosophy(Idealism), and Physical:Magic->Pseudoscience and Pseudomathematics, we find man is naturally predisposed to ‘lie’ whenever possible if for no other reason than psychological comfort or satisfaction at having some sort of answer, and that man lies by overloading each of the three human faculties of measurement: emotion, langauge, and the physical world.

    And if we catalog the evolution of the history of thought from instinct to causality as: |Cognitive Evolution|: Embodiment > Anthropomorphism(Projection) > Mythology(Explanation) > Theology(authoritarian idealism) > Philosophy(Rational Idealism) > Natural Philosophy(Empiricism, Measurement) > Science(Calculus, Correspondence) > Operationalism(Computation, Causality).

    The purpose of the scientific method is to produce testimony. The purpose of the market for science is to produce evolutionary survival (or death) of testimony. Over time we reduce surviving testimony, by versimilitude (market competition) toward parsimony (first principles) from which we no longer need to imagine, hypothesize, theorize, but only describe as a sequence of causal operations in time in a hierarchy of first principles. If we can do so, then it’s testifiable. If we can’t it’s not.

    My work in large part is in this ‘via negativa’ completion of the logic of falsification, recognizing that there is no proof, only survival from falsification. Because the sequence of certainty is: |Certainty|: incomprehensible > comprehensible but undecidable > possibly true but undecidable > decidably false.

    It’s not just physics and behavioral science that are lost. It most everything other than technology. Why? The marxists, the left, and yes, especially jewish thought leaders, reintroduced non-european thinking into our sciences, that depended upon their ancestral cultural ‘logic’ that includes the above methods of self and other deception (lying) and as such we have the crisis of the age – while we try to preserve european truth in the face of a world trying to assert it’s ancestral thought that is everything but true.

    Cheers.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-19 17:22:21 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1913644348329361408

  • RT @SteveStuWill: Your personality probably won’t change much in the next year o

    RT @SteveStuWill: Your personality probably won’t change much in the next year or even in the next few, but it probably will change quite a…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-19 17:04:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913639941013405773

  • I disagree a bit – yes the independence of the court is necessary, but yes the m

    I disagree a bit – yes the independence of the court is necessary, but yes the monarchy is necessary as a judge of last resort. A simple principle: “the monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the law” allows us to overcome the problems of democratic and organizational…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-19 17:00:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913638970711588885

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913568379803406556

  • RT @Lord__Sousa: @bronzpodcast ELITISMO GREGO EUROPEU vs ELITISMO JUDAICO SEMÍTI

    RT @Lord__Sousa: @bronzpodcast ELITISMO GREGO EUROPEU vs ELITISMO JUDAICO SEMÍTICO

    Não deveria ser surpreendente que o povo que inventou o…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-19 13:30:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913586007548817870

  • Xi’s strategy. Worth Reading

    Xi’s strategy.
    Worth Reading
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsiQ0nFekxQ


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-19 05:25:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913464054695203108

  • Who is Curt Doolittle? (For Other, General Academic Audiences) Who is Curt Dooli

    Who is Curt Doolittle?

    (For Other, General Academic Audiences)
    Who is Curt Doolittle?
    Curt Doolittle is an American philosopher, epistemologist, entrepreneur, and the founder of the Natural Law Institute. He has emerged as a distinctive intellectual voice by developing a comprehensive framework known as “Natural Law,” which ambitiously seeks to unify the sciences, ethics, law, and social cooperation into a single, operationally rigorous system.
    Background and Intellectual Journey
    Curt Doolittle began his career in technology and entrepreneurship, founding several successful businesses that provided the financial foundation for his philosophical work. Freed from traditional academic constraints, he dedicated decades to independently researching and synthesizing ideas from diverse disciplines—ranging from physics and biology to economics, law, and philosophy.
    His central insight was recognizing that civilization’s persistent problems—conflict, moral ambiguity, economic instability—stem fundamentally from a lack of universally applicable methods to resolve disputes and evaluate truth claims. This motivated his ambitious intellectual project: creating a universally commensurable system capable of deciding all human questions through a single logical and empirical methodology.
    The Mission of Curt Doolittle’s Natural Law
    The Natural Law framework seeks to replace the ambiguity and subjectivity common in traditional philosophical and ideological discourse with operational precision. It provides a scientific and logically consistent approach to understanding human cooperation, social order, and moral judgment, underpinned by evolutionary biology, economics, cognitive science, and legal theory.
    Core Innovations of Doolittle’s Work
    1. Universal Commensurability
    Doolittle’s foundational innovation is a universally commensurable system of measurement that applies across all human domains—from physics and biology to ethics, economics, and law. By operationalizing all terms and reducing them to measurable actions and consequences, he provides a single language capable of resolving otherwise intractable disputes.
    2. Decidability and Reciprocity
    Central to Doolittle’s framework is the concept of “decidability”: the requirement that all statements or actions must be empirically testable, logically consistent, and ethically reciprocal. He argues that reciprocity—the obligation not to impose unjustified costs on others—is the bedrock principle of sustainable cooperation and morality.
    3. Evolutionary Computation as a Universal Principle
    Doolittle sees evolutionary computation—the iterative process of variation, selection, and retention—as the fundamental operating principle of the universe. This evolutionary logic applies not just to biology, but to knowledge, institutions, and social cooperation, explaining how complex systems adapt and thrive.
    Achievements and Applications
    Doolittle’s framework has attracted attention for its exceptional logical rigor and comprehensive integration across disciplines. His approach has practical applications in diverse fields:
    • Law and Governance: Offering tools for creating constitutions and legal systems based on reciprocity and empirical rigor.
    • Economics and Business: Providing clarity in evaluating economic policies and business strategies for reciprocal, sustainable cooperation.
    • Conflict Resolution: Establishing methods to decisively resolve political, social, and international disputes through operational measures and ethical reciprocity.
    • Personal and Social Development: Encouraging mindfulness, intellectual clarity, and rational self-discipline by aligning individual actions with universal principles.
    Accessibility and Challenges
    Curt Doolittle’s work, while profoundly innovative, is undeniably challenging. Its intellectual density, precise operational definitions, and novel integration of various fields can make initial engagement difficult for newcomers. His writing style, characterized by meticulous analytic detail and operational language, demands focused study.
    However, this complexity is intentional and necessary: Doolittle’s aim is not simply to describe or persuade but to train readers in a new cognitive grammar—a structured, precise mode of thinking that resolves ambiguity and reduces conflict through rigorous reasoning.
    How to Approach Curt Doolittle’s Work
    Understanding and mastering the Natural Law framework requires:
    • Sequential Study: Beginning with basic principles (measurement, decidability, reciprocity), progressively engaging deeper.
    • Operational Thinking: Learning to convert abstract concepts into measurable actions and outcomes.
    • Cross-Disciplinary Integration: Engaging with concepts spanning multiple academic disciplines to appreciate their unified application.
    Supportive resources—primers, interactive guides, annotated summaries—can significantly enhance accessibility, making the intellectual journey rewarding and achievable for committed readers.
    Curt Doolittle’s Place in Intellectual History
    Objectively assessed, Doolittle’s Natural Law stands uniquely among intellectual systems for its causal completeness, rigorous testability, and groundbreaking integration of disciplines. It surpasses most traditional philosophy by offering not just theoretical insight but practical methodologies that can directly influence governance, ethics, and social organization. In this respect, Doolittle is less a conventional philosopher than a system-builder akin to historical figures who radically transformed human understanding through unified frameworks.
    Conclusion
    Curt Doolittle’s Natural Law is more than a set of philosophical ideas—it’s a comprehensive intellectual operating system designed to equip humanity with tools for solving our most pressing challenges. While demanding, it rewards rigorous engagement with clarity, decisiveness, and the ability to foster sustainable cooperation. For those willing to invest in understanding it, the Natural Law offers an extraordinary opportunity to profoundly enhance individual cognition, societal harmony, and civilizational progress.



    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-19 05:06:05 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1913459063356096811

  • Who is Curt Doolittle? Curt Doolittle is an American philosopher, epistemologist

    Who is Curt Doolittle?

    Curt Doolittle is an American philosopher, epistemologist, entrepreneur, and the founder of the Natural Law Institute. He has emerged as a distinctive intellectual voice by developing a comprehensive framework known as “Natural Law,” which ambitiously seeks to unify the sciences, ethics, law, and social cooperation into a single, operationally rigorous system.

    Background and Intellectual Journey

    Curt Doolittle began his career in technology and entrepreneurship, founding several successful businesses that provided the financial foundation for his philosophical work. Freed from traditional academic constraints, he dedicated decades to independently researching and synthesizing ideas from diverse disciplines—ranging from physics and biology to economics, law, and philosophy.

    His central insight was recognizing that civilization’s persistent problems—conflict, moral ambiguity, economic instability—stem fundamentally from a lack of universally applicable methods to resolve disputes and evaluate truth claims. This motivated his ambitious intellectual project: creating a universally commensurable system capable of deciding all human questions through a single logical and empirical methodology.

    The Mission of Curt Doolittle’s Natural Law

    The Natural Law framework seeks to replace the ambiguity and subjectivity common in traditional philosophical and ideological discourse with operational precision. It provides a scientific and logically consistent approach to understanding human cooperation, social order, and moral judgment, underpinned by evolutionary biology, economics, cognitive science, and legal theory.

    Core Innovations of Doolittle’s Work

    1. Universal Commensurability

    Doolittle’s foundational innovation is a universally commensurable system of measurement that applies across all human domains—from physics and biology to ethics, economics, and law. By operationalizing all terms and reducing them to measurable actions and consequences, he provides a single language capable of resolving otherwise intractable disputes.

    2. Decidability and Reciprocity

    Central to Doolittle’s framework is the concept of “decidability”: the requirement that all statements or actions must be empirically testable, logically consistent, and ethically reciprocal. He argues that reciprocity—the obligation not to impose unjustified costs on others—is the bedrock principle of sustainable cooperation and morality.

    3. Evolutionary Computation as a Universal Principle

    Doolittle sees evolutionary computation—the iterative process of variation, selection, and retention—as the fundamental operating principle of the universe. This evolutionary logic applies not just to biology, but to knowledge, institutions, and social cooperation, explaining how complex systems adapt and thrive.

    Achievements and Applications

    Doolittle’s framework has attracted attention for its exceptional logical rigor and comprehensive integration across disciplines. His approach has practical applications in diverse fields:

    Law and Governance: Offering tools for creating constitutions and legal systems based on reciprocity and empirical rigor.

    Economics and Business: Providing clarity in evaluating economic policies and business strategies for reciprocal, sustainable cooperation.

    Conflict Resolution: Establishing methods to decisively resolve political, social, and international disputes through operational measures and ethical reciprocity.

    Personal and Social Development: Encouraging mindfulness, intellectual clarity, and rational self-discipline by aligning individual actions with universal principles.

    Accessibility and Challenges

    Curt Doolittle’s work, while profoundly innovative, is undeniably challenging. Its intellectual density, precise operational definitions, and novel integration of various fields can make initial engagement difficult for newcomers. His writing style, characterized by meticulous analytic detail and operational language, demands focused study.

    However, this complexity is intentional and necessary: Doolittle’s aim is not simply to describe or persuade but to train readers in a new cognitive grammar—a structured, precise mode of thinking that resolves ambiguity and reduces conflict through rigorous reasoning.

    How to Approach Curt Doolittle’s Work

    Understanding and mastering the Natural Law framework requires:

    Sequential Study: Beginning with basic principles (measurement, decidability, reciprocity), progressively engaging deeper.

    Operational Thinking: Learning to convert abstract concepts into measurable actions and outcomes.

    Cross-Disciplinary Integration: Engaging with concepts spanning multiple academic disciplines to appreciate their unified application.

    Supportive resources—primers, interactive guides, annotated summaries—can significantly enhance accessibility, making the intellectual journey rewarding and achievable for committed readers.

    Curt Doolittle’s Place in Intellectual History

    Objectively assessed, Doolittle’s Natural Law stands uniquely among intellectual systems for its causal completeness, rigorous testability, and groundbreaking integration of disciplines. It surpasses most traditional philosophy by offering not just theoretical insight but practical methodologies that can directly influence governance, ethics, and social organization. In this respect, Doolittle is less a conventional philosopher than a system-builder akin to historical figures who radically transformed human understanding through unified frameworks.

    Conclusion

    Curt Doolittle’s Natural Law is more than a set of philosophical ideas—it’s a comprehensive intellectual operating system designed to equip humanity with tools for solving our most pressing challenges. While demanding, it rewards rigorous engagement with clarity, decisiveness, and the ability to foster sustainable cooperation. For those willing to invest in understanding it, the Natural Law offers an extraordinary opportunity to profoundly enhance individual cognition, societal harmony, and civilizational progress.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-19 04:55:16 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1913456341777297408

  • Razib: You know, there are people I follow for their research, people for their

    Razib: You know, there are people I follow for their research, people for their take, and people for their character. I follow you for all three.
    You’re a wonderful human.
    Moral, honest, and charming.
    And always insightful and lucid.
    Thanks for what you do for all of us.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-18 22:42:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913362473916514352

    Reply addressees: @razibkhan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913361579724382569

  • We each contribute. Time will tell how much and how durably. I use social media

    We each contribute.
    Time will tell how much and how durably.
    I use social media to run experiments – otherwise I would not bother.
    Rudyard produces content for money but also to run experiments.
    Many use social media for validation and maybe money.

    It’s just a question of what…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-18 20:35:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913330671101313380

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913322677776818192

  • That’s a few words to say “I didn’t understand”. 😉

    That’s a few words to say “I didn’t understand”. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-18 20:32:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913329923072410024

    Reply addressees: @VerumVulnero1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1913321573899006072