Source: Twitter X

  • “WHEN TRUTH BECOMES RIGHT WING” https:// youtube.com/watch?v=g7Hf21 j3yBA … So,

    “WHEN TRUTH BECOMES RIGHT WING”

    https://
    youtube.com/watch?v=g7Hf21
    j3yBA

    So, I’m a conservative libertarian in the Jefferson tradition, and because I work to advance truth in political discourse I’m ‘right wing’ when ‘the mainstream’ is trying to demonize ‘right wing’ as well as Truth?


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 18:25:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1943013616170778841

  • (Thank you. Love you man.)

    (Thank you. Love you man.)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 17:23:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942998022864146503

  • I have a friend who runs a company that produces, installs, and maintains water

    I have a friend who runs a company that produces, installs, and maintains water quality equipment for government and industry. I’m in a coffee shop sitting next to men of similar disposition producing waste water pumps for the same. In the past I’ve said the only company I can tolerate consists of other consultants and ceos. Because everyone else sounds like children running with populist or ideological scissors. Yet the people who make the world viable for those ‘children’ and their petty feelings, thoughts, and concerns, are relatively invisible from any discourse – precisely because the children have gone ‘wild’ since they left the proximity to production for survival necessary on the farm.
    The world works because men who matter keep their heads down and work relatively invisibly and without respect or consideration.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 17:16:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942996250619740642

  • At least for me, it is the only ‘release’ that works, mostly because y’all suppo

    At least for me, it is the only ‘release’ that works, mostly because y’all support me so consistently. 😉 -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 17:11:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942995043092172886

  • Net is, that it is emotionally draining, exhausting, and bordering on despair do

    Net is, that it is emotionally draining, exhausting, and bordering on despair doing this job. But who else will do it? It’s profoundly difficult just to vaguely understand the necessary scope of knowledge. It’s profoundly difficult to afford the time to do it. It’s profoundly difficult to maintain the emotional neutrality to do it. It’s profoundly difficult to suffer the slings and arrows of conflict. And the impact on one’s personal life is debilitating.
    So that’s why there are so few of us.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 17:09:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942994474705260551

  • The only reason there are so few of us doing the research – the hard work – of d

    The only reason there are so few of us doing the research – the hard work – of discovering truth in the behavioral sciences across the spectrum, and solutions using that truth, is because no one actually wants a means of cooperation … then want a means of success by defeat.
    And those of us who discover and purvey the truth are doomed to be cursed by both sides as enemies, fools or traitors.
    I’m pretty exhausted – especially given my libertarian moral instincts – by the fact that the left considers me evil, the libertarians a defector, and the right a seditionist that’s trying to make peace with the enemy.
    Now, one can sit in one’s ivory tower and suffer the slings and arrows while camping amidst one’s fellows. But when we attempt to engage in activism or god forbid business, we leave that ivory tower and the company of our fellows, and venture into the daily warfare that constitutes the century and a half of collapse of our civilization under the influence of the feminine, the left, the christian, and the foolishly optimistic right, and naive libertarian. All of whom were made possible by the by the government they inherited from the aristocracy, and the economy inherited from the upper middle and middle classes, such that the folly of the lower classes, the effeminate males, and women could be expressed in economy and polity.
    The high trust of the federation of the aristocratic west, its truth before face as honorable, combined with folly of utopian christian optimism, combined with the evolution of distributed restoration of european trade, gave us profound advantage – but the hole in it is tolerance for that which would undermine any aspect of it.
    And the combination of the left and women voters did what no army in history could have.
    Just as it did to greece and rome.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 17:05:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942993520215888038

  • I don’t do hate. I do frustration. I do frustration to the point of anger. And s

    I don’t do hate. I do frustration. I do frustration to the point of anger. And sometimes to near despair. But other than a few deserving lawyers I don’t do hate. On the other hand I do sex, class, culture and race realism – but only so we maximize cooperation by minimizing conflict. Everything I do is and always has been toward the elimination of deception, falsehood and false promise, and fraud, so that we may use governments for the purpose of producing commons particular to the abilities and needs of different groups, and trade between groups for the satisfaction of others’ wants and needs.
    No more lies.
    Truth and reciprocity is just the highest form of love for mankind.

    (And yes I am having a moment of near despair. I’ll get over it.)


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 15:52:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942975195930911122

  • Dunno. You want to meet up in person and do something about it?

    Dunno. You want to meet up in person and do something about it?


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 02:36:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942774818799239592

  • Just too many battles today. Hopelessness overwhelms me at times just like every

    Just too many battles today. Hopelessness overwhelms me at times just like everyone else. The only cure is sleep, a few days off, and the will to continue the good fight.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-09 02:17:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1942770033626923270

  • Response to Accusation of Anti-Semitism Response to Accusation of Anti-Semitism

    Response to Accusation of Anti-Semitism

    Response to Accusation of Anti-Semitism
    The claim is false. I criticize Abrahamism—not Jews. The difference is categorical.
    Anti-Semitism is racial or ethnic animus.

    Anti-Abrahamism is a critique of a sequence of moral grammars (Judaism → Christianity → Islam → Marxism → Postmodernism → Wokeism) that replace reciprocity with deceit, emotional coercion, and universalist false promises.

    Abrahamic systems disable falsification, prohibit retaliation, and reward parasitism—subverting the necessary law of reciprocity that makes civilization possible.
    This critique is not ethnic. It is legal, operational, and moral:
    – I demand truth
    – I demand reciprocity
    – I demand decidability
    If you’re going to accuse me, then satisfy the test of testimonial truth: define your terms, operationalize harm, demonstrate asymmetry. Otherwise, you’re just retaliating emotionally against uncomfortable facts.
    This isn’t hate. This is law.
    —Truth is enough.
    MORE….

    To respond effectively and truthfully to an accusation of anti-Semitism when the actual critique is anti-Abrahamism, you must:

    1. Define the Distinction Operationally
    Anti-Semitism refers to hatred or discrimination against people of Jewish descent, typically based on ethnicity or religion. It is an ethnocentric claim.
    Anti-Abrahamism, by contrast, is a critique of group evolutionary strategy and grammar—specifically the feminine, deceit-tolerant, conflationary, and non-reciprocal speech grammars evolved in the Semitic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) and extended through Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism.
    2. Frame the Critique Within the Law of Reciprocity
    The critique of Abrahamic moral systems is rooted in their violation of reciprocity in public speech, law, and institutional organization:
    • They make false promises of equality, liberation, or utopia that externalize costs onto others.
    • They prohibit retaliation, undermining the evolutionary necessity of reciprocity.
    • They use pilpul and critique (GSRRM) as methods of evading falsification and accountability.
    Thus, the critique is legal, operational, and reciprocity-enforcing, not racial or ethnic.
    3. Demand Reciprocity in Return
    This adversarial framing forces the accuser to operationalize their claim, which they almost always cannot do without collapsing into moral projection or status-seeking.
    4. Reframe the Discussion as a Conflict of Moral Orders
    The Natural Law project is a European strategy of truth-telling, sovereignty, and reciprocity. Abrahamism is a Semitic strategy of obedience, deception, and submission to universal authority—whether that be Yahweh, Marx, or Progress.
    The claim is not who is right by preference, but which system produces decidability, reciprocity, and prosperity under evolutionary constraint.
    5. Close with the Moral License


    Source date (UTC): 2025-07-08 22:26:54 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1942712022736724475