Source: Twitter X

The more I teach CurtGPT the more amazing and clear its responses. I’m having a ball. 😉

I suppose we shouldn’t be blown away by it because we’ve engineered it for this purpose. But it’s still amazing. 😉

So basically if we get the categories of response correct, the vocabulary of delivery is an arbitrary preference.

Similarly, if we address markets with different taboos/sacreds (moral biases) then that’s just an alternation in the valence of demonstrated interests.

Agreed. It just surprised me. I thought I would have to soften it, and instead I’m sensitive to it being too soft.

The models answer almost identically but a bit differently in tone. o3 is more terse and 4o is more narrative and as such has a bit more breadth. For the average audience I prefer 4o.

My only concern is that given the argument (response) is so precise it’s a bit long. But it will definitely teach people what we want them to learn.