Source: Twitter X

(Ruminations)
Watching the people working closest to me incrementally understand ‘the work’ is fascinating. Yesterday, Brad seemed to finally understand ‘it’s all geometry’. (Explaining this is quite difficult however.) Better said that geometry is a superior frame of reference for understanding the first principles, applied first principles, and resulting general rules of all existence.

Now, for those who have been with me for say, the past six years, you might recall that back then, I attempted to create a course on natural law (“The Work”) starting with geometry as the model upon which the rest would be built. But it wasn’t long before I understood people couldn’t grasp it because more context was needed TO grasp it.

Brad helped convince me to construct The Work from physics upward instead of logic (geometry) upward, or ethics outward. And it’s fascinating that having worked on reducing the first principles of the physical world to ternary logic, that upon doing so, sufficient context exists that Brad, on his own, grasped “it’s just geometry”.

Working from physics upward was not intuitive – at least for me – because I spent so much effort and interest on logic and grammars. So in my ‘worldview’, we start with logic and language to connect man’s ability to sense, percieve, and test information about the world by ‘man is the measure of all things to man’, to the physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws. But this approach was backwards – for no other reason than the internal workings of the brain and mind are unknown and often not only misunderstood, but entirely false, for most ( almost all ) of mankind.

So we must teach the patterns of existence first, and then teach the logics – and in teaching the logics we learn the mind of man and the ‘mind’ of the universe, and realize …. they are the same.