RT @AutistocratMS: Suggested policy: Cancel citizenship of all dual citizens, including self-identified citizens of the world.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 17:19:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741509332699623462
RT @AutistocratMS: Suggested policy: Cancel citizenship of all dual citizens, including self-identified citizens of the world.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 17:19:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741509332699623462
(Great minds think alike… lol )
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 15:02:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474811002417327
Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @WalterIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474662880575961
(Testimony)
–“I got into [Curt’s Work] through international law and political economy. It’s amazing how accurate and adaptable it is across disciples.”– Anglo-Aristotelian @NWEurasian
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 15:01:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474682715480250
(Testimony)
–“I got into [Curt’s Work] through international law and political economy. It’s amazing how accurate and adaptable it is across disciples.”– Anglo-Aristotelian @NWEurasian
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 15:01:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474682635730945
Be interesting to hear your elaboration on your last sentence.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 15:00:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474318406529230
Reply addressees: @ImmoBulgarije
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474097794588991
THE FUTURE OF PROGRAMMING: SHOULD I STILL LEARN TO CODE? 😉
I don’t give our career advice without deep knowledge of the individual and the industry. I have a few cognitive flaws and that is overestimating people, and I find that it’s counterproductive.
However, I would say that the population of most white collar jobs will decrease, and rather drastically, on the scale of the farming to labor, and the labor to automation, and clerical to computer shifts.
So any opinion anyone gives on the future is worth whatever monetary bet they are willing to put on it, and nothing more. Me included.
That said, I see programming very quickly elimiating programmers per se, and instead, the work left to people who tell AI’s what to program, and people who tell AI’s what to test, and what to fix or improve – and so ‘programming’ will require fewer people. Even if I suspect the high end will always consist of ‘cunning humans’ who augment their theories with AIs that make testing those thories cheaper.
Example, when I first started writing applications I was surpised how much more productive I was than the prevoius generation of programmers (cobol fortran etc). Then when I built my first consulting companies, as the PC world replaced the iron and expanded further into more niches, then it might take 25-75 people to write some software application. But within a few years that number dropped to five. Same thing with games. I wrote some amazing games in assembler when in my early twenties. But today it can either take a whole studio many years to produce a game, or an individual just a few months.
The difference ‘now’ is that we have been rapidly increasing the population of programmers, and we have been producing a lot of bad (sh**t) code, because the browser tech encourages bad (sh**t) code. So I expect AIs to not only replace masses of programmers writing bad (sh**t) code, but that such a replacement will add to a change in the browser tech (long overdue). Furthermore if you look at my company’s app (which is on hold at the moment) it replaces dozens of other apps, becasue most apps aren’t, apps or platforms, they’re features begging to be consolidated.
So what I look at that horizon I see work to be done in programming, and perhaps more better code, but I can’t tell if a drop in the existing employment is short and mediumterm, or long term. Or whether the meaning of programming is just shifting to using english instead of progrmming languages and that many more people will be needed to produce better software more cheaply.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @adominguez792
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:59:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474132699537409
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741468561149747514
THE NORTH-SOUTH DIVIDE IS A WORLD NORM – WE AREN’T SPECIAL
Just as northern italy is middle class germanic and southern italy is underclass greek, just as canada is a soft war between the underclass catholic french of quebec, and the middle class protestant english in the rest of the country, or in the UK the scotts in the north, and the english in the south, the USA is, at least on the north south divide, a soft war between the middle class culture of the english in the north and working class culture of the scotts irish in the south, with the germans more often than not split between them.
The nine (or eleven) nations of north america is about right. But more than that, we are now in a position where the basic political structures necessary for urban centers vs suburban and rural territories is such that we require city states to divorce from territorial states in addition to dividing into sub-nations.
So while there was value in a central government in order to conquer the territory and drive out the europeans so that we would be militarily safe (one of the smart moves in human history) and this is the purpose of empires, at this point there is far less value in the central government for other than it’s original intent as defense, trade policy, dispute resolution between states. So just as say, in china and russia, south america, and the middle east, people want smaller governments with shorter power distance, that more directly address their wants and needs – americans want local control of social policy even if strategic and military policy (as well as emergency services) are centralized. After all, the sole purpose of Republican (rule of law) government is the insurer of last resort.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @Flavus59
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:46:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741470892834643968
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741460280721182748
RT @ernunnos: Everybody knew everybody. Or at least everybody who was anybody. In an age of manual labor, the upper class in any area was s…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:37:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741468600857145652
No, the LLMs were a windfall because (as some of us expected) they started to produce unpredictable outcomes with novel insights – what we call ’emergent behaviors’.
In retrospect we should have understood a bit better what we were doing because essentially we’re brute forcing…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:37:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741468509836611805
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741466963912601717

(NLI Adjustment: Via Positiva Aristocracy)
For more than a decade now, the broader community has asked me to work in the via positiva (meaning what we should do), instead of the via negativa of the law (what we should not do).
And while I quite accidentally discovered that the… https://t.co/41No31B6ku

Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:35:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741468082822860874