Source: Twitter X

I don’t seek approval, only allies and students. So I write for the audience that is has potential, is willing and able. It’s up to others to distill the work for those that are not. Every time I try to reach into or help the unable, they defend their ignorance and bias with greater effort than they seek to understand. All the expended effort has done is convince me that the unpleasant aggressive overconfident failures on the right are just as bad or worse than their peers on the left.
I don’t know you other than I might recognize your cognitive pattern from a few prior posts. But if you wish to falsify me or my work you would need a better argument than your gut feeling, a demonstration of understanding something I’ve said, and some record of life achievement to demonstrate general competency.
I’ll refrain from explaining the cause of such behavior in detail, but given I have a deep specialization in incentives and means of deceit of self and others it would be trivial.
This kind of exchange is a chance to test you for potential or exclude you from it. While the staff would accuse me of wasting my time, sometimes that investment pays off.

Reply addressees: @BobJone77944187 @Glace15840573 @MindEnjoyer