Death sentence.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:51:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776276429589598701
Reply addressees: @Babygravy9 @ContraFabianist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1768280257725956172
Death sentence.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:51:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776276429589598701
Reply addressees: @Babygravy9 @ContraFabianist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1768280257725956172
PRIVILEGE IS JUST WHITENESS WHICH IS JUST TRUSTWORTHINESS WHICH IS JUST RESPONSIBILITY
It’s not privilege if you earned it. And white people earn it through practicing “whiteness”.
What is “whiteness”? It’s adherence to and preservations of, and insurance of, the institutions… https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1770517795718975732
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:50:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776276140375580826
Martin Stepan (@AutistocratMS) again, demonstrating his extraordinary ability, knowledge, and skill (on a daily basis). But unlike Brandon, Luke, Noah, Contrafabian and I, he has no tolerance for optimism or hedging, and issues judgements that are as prosecutorial as they are… https://twitter.com/AutistocratMS/status/1773054450258608363
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:43:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776274367808250168
Our own Contrafabian (@ContraFabianist) demonstrating that he is the best of us. This man will surpass me with age if he continues this progress. Like my good friend Rudyard Lynch, Contrafabian is young, and still in university. This is what the future holds.
Extraordinary… https://twitter.com/ContraFabianist/status/1776265564291252559
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:38:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776273261354971268
https://twitter.com/ContraFabianist/status/1776265564291252559
RT @ContraFabianist: Human rights elevate the individual as the primary unit of moral decidability. By elevating the individual, the human…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 15:34:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776272266939998709
Same
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 14:32:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776256620219007246
Reply addressees: @pintleinjector
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776247506768134267
Absolutely false. In fact the research and development is reverse engineering the brain and its intelligence by brute force working backward from language. They’re already working on wayfinding and adversarial selection (reasoning) the beginnings of which will be delivered this year; pseudo-parallelism this year or next; and neuromorphic architecture that will both produce that parallelism and end the cost and delay of pre-training. At least one group brute forced world modeling the physical world and embodiment by the same method. And my work on homeostasis and ethical and moral judgment and limits is computable. They have solved attention already, and consciousness, despite the laments of theologians and philosophers, is just a memory effect of all of the above.
The problem with the maturation of that combination of techniques, which I’m sure you’ve expressed in your statement of limits, is that the primary limit to demonstrated intelligence consists of (a) working memory – which of course, even the current tech can solve, (b) regulating ‘hallucination’ to creative ideation that’s then falsified by recursive wayfinding for operational possibility, and (c) the material and economic problem of hypothesizing (‘hallucination’), and constructing tests and experiments in the real world.
I suspect you have already noted that while there will be some early returns on the language models from synthesis of existing knowledge, and further from well established dynamic systems such as chemistry and proteins, but those returns are likely subject to diminishing returns – and we are left once again to imagining theories that can be tested by costly real world means. That is, until we have discovered sufficient first principles (laws) at every emergent layer of complexity (the scientific disciplines) that we’ve discovered the equivalent of the programming langauge of the universe.
Even then, knowing what is, is a smaller set of concepts than knowing what might be – which like language is infinite.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @GaryMarcus
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 14:19:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776253269733482496
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776023251162173456
You are only accumulating knowledge, respect, and influence until you become aware of your purpose. The threat to that purpose is suspecting you’ve found it before you have because you will believe you are ‘done’ and never discover it.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 13:51:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776246383244165528
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776107397414572327
RT @DiggingInTheDi1: @jakeshieldsajj @curtdoolittle is a criminally underappreciated account.
He understands grand designs and causal prop…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 13:47:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776245201993884116
Well done. Elegantly stated.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 11:34:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776211787181916362
Reply addressees: @GracianoGreen @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776153485945213302