Smart. True. Always a pleasure to see your ideas MW.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 21:12:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973858564868616261
Smart. True. Always a pleasure to see your ideas MW.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 21:12:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973858564868616261
(Diary)
“Women are expensive”
If I go back through my relationships whether girlfriends (LTRs), or wives, despite that each separation has been painful, and some almost intolerably so, I have been better off after each one.
But why is that?
Women are the most costly and most limiting thing a man can invest in. Secondly, women change about every seven years or so, because of hormonal maturity and decay. Men don’t chang per se, their capacity does.
Both sexes can stagnate (easily).
So you can re-invest in your next ‘self’ once you exit a relationship that imposes costs on your ability to upgrade yourself, your relationships, you occupation, and your wealth.
Now, I’m one of those men who tends to put women on a pedestal (at least in their domains of excellence) and almost without exception I still love all my ex’s. And I think of my life as the history of the women I’ve loved and the companies I’ve built. But I have always been realistic about the fact that you cannot tolerate any disrespect from a women, nor surrender sovereignty to them in matters outside of the home (her nest). Instead if it ‘does’t matter’ then try to enable her. If it does matter try to constrain her. And never create reasons for her to feel unsafe in your relationship or in life. In fact if you can discover what makes a woman feel safe and provide it that’s about all it takes.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 19:28:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973832443141763584
(Diary)
My wife ruined me. I am forever vulnerable to redheads. It’s like 80% of your neurons become either numb or directed to pursuit. It’s terrible. It’s like a disease that randomly deprives you of free will. lol
(Somehow I think I’ll live).
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 19:03:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973826266999734704
(Told You So)
As the wyrm turns, we can see I was right in 2022 on Russia, Ukraine, and Poland, and was right on Trump’s strategy with Europe. Prediction isn’t hard if you can separate your moral instinct from your predictions, and measure from the data rather than the storytelling. The left doesn’t work by anything other than instinct, and the right is too easy to sway by it.
Humans are exasperating animals. ๐
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 18:58:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973824924113576221
–“Nations do what they absolutely have to do.”— George Friedman
@georgefriedman
I might argue for a touch more clarity; that they only do what costs them, what they absolutely have to do.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 18:44:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973821433756463596
I hope so. But be prepared for being randomly hugged, high-fived, and treated as heroes for it. ๐ lol
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 18:34:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973818785456144849
I’m from the opposition. And it’s because you’re wrong. We have ‘scienced’ why you and those like you are wrong. It’s just so offensive we’re too well mannered to so so in public.
Female sedition against male dominance by the one civilization that instantiated the female strategy of undermining to compensate for inability to produce anything of strategi value. Your intuitions are false. Your method of argument is a deception. Over the next twenty years it will become common knowledge.
As far back as 2009 I thought I’d spend a few years explaining you and krugman and a few others who use sedition by critique. I eventually understood the hole in our laws that let you get away with institutionalizing lying. And with a science of lying, and exposure of your use of it, we can permanently outlaw it. And end the abrahamic > marxist >postmodern sequence of deceptions.
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-02 18:33:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973818514659291159
Source date (UTC): 2025-10-01 21:51:43 UTC
Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1973506137908715761
(Yes)
Source date (UTC): 2025-09-30 15:00:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1973040176030269922
The fact than anyone even vaguely understands anything meaningful I say still amazes me.
And its only at this stage of writing volumes I fully understand the historical trap of math, physics, and even functional programming as imposing cognitive limits that resist the evolution of our thought into grammars, economics, law, and simulation (object oriented programming and bayesian marginal indifference).
I understood the semitic/feminine problem of verbalism in mathematics vs the european/masculine as measurement. I understood the problem of mathiness in both. But the barrier overemphasis and mathiness created as an inhibition on thought was far greater than I understood.
Source date (UTC): 2025-09-29 18:07:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1972724810326389161