Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Economic Language Is Always Superior in Psychology and Sociology

    Economic Language Is Always Superior in Psychology and Sociology https://t.co/EbjWqB1CCe

  • Economic Language Is Always Superior in Psychology and Sociology

    Nov 23, 2019, 8:58 AM We empathize (imitate emotions) We sympathize (imitate mind) We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We habituate negotiating strategies. We negotiate in a market. Markets evolve superior products as standards of weight and measure. Markets of superior products gradually adapt to one another creating commensurable networks of products with additive returns. Economic language is always superior for psychology and sociology because it unifies behavior w physics. Economic logic (markets) de-emphasizes (un-biases) ‘belief and agency’ and correctly restores the hierarchy between ‘rider(reason) and elephant(intuition)’. We would not require consciousness if not for negotiating cooperation. By using economic logic we gain agency in psychology and sociology as we did in physics.

  • Economic Language Is Always Superior in Psychology and Sociology

    Nov 23, 2019, 8:58 AM We empathize (imitate emotions) We sympathize (imitate mind) We (must) negotiate (offer, acquire). We habituate negotiating strategies. We negotiate in a market. Markets evolve superior products as standards of weight and measure. Markets of superior products gradually adapt to one another creating commensurable networks of products with additive returns. Economic language is always superior for psychology and sociology because it unifies behavior w physics. Economic logic (markets) de-emphasizes (un-biases) ‘belief and agency’ and correctly restores the hierarchy between ‘rider(reason) and elephant(intuition)’. We would not require consciousness if not for negotiating cooperation. By using economic logic we gain agency in psychology and sociology as we did in physics.

  • Womens and Men’s Brains

    Womens and Men’s Brains https://t.co/tbhFii7Hrw

  • Womens and Men’s Brains

    Nov 23, 2019, 9:19 AM Women’s brains are structured to deliver greater attention to empathy and fear (vulnerability), and even more so after puberty (leading to high female mental illness), unless cognitive load provided (children) – the mirror of men, physicality, and competition. Men’s brains are structured to deliver greater attention to physical reality, and competition, and to limit empathy and fear, and even more so after puberty (leading to high male aggression) unless cognitive load provided (competition, sport, hunting, teamwork). SCHOOL IS CAUSING BRAIN DAMAGE AND INFANTILIZATION

  • Womens and Men’s Brains

    Nov 23, 2019, 9:19 AM Women’s brains are structured to deliver greater attention to empathy and fear (vulnerability), and even more so after puberty (leading to high female mental illness), unless cognitive load provided (children) – the mirror of men, physicality, and competition. Men’s brains are structured to deliver greater attention to physical reality, and competition, and to limit empathy and fear, and even more so after puberty (leading to high male aggression) unless cognitive load provided (competition, sport, hunting, teamwork). SCHOOL IS CAUSING BRAIN DAMAGE AND INFANTILIZATION

  • Gender Differences in Personality

    Gender Differences in Personality https://t.co/Or3bgqQ7KH

  • Gender Differences in Personality

    —“Personality measures were obtained from a large US sample (N = 10,261) with the 16PF Questionnaire. Multigroup latent variable modeling was used to estimate sex differences on individual personality dimensions, which were then aggregated to yield a multivariate effect size (Mahalanobis D). We found a global effect size D = 2.71, corresponding to an overlap of only 10% between the male and female distributions. Even excluding the factor showing the largest univariate ES, the global effect size was D = 1.71 (24% overlap). These are extremely large differences by psychological standards.”—

  • Gender Differences in Personality

    —“Personality measures were obtained from a large US sample (N = 10,261) with the 16PF Questionnaire. Multigroup latent variable modeling was used to estimate sex differences on individual personality dimensions, which were then aggregated to yield a multivariate effect size (Mahalanobis D). We found a global effect size D = 2.71, corresponding to an overlap of only 10% between the male and female distributions. Even excluding the factor showing the largest univariate ES, the global effect size was D = 1.71 (24% overlap). These are extremely large differences by psychological standards.”—

  • Wealth Causes Genders to Specialize Not Compromise

    Wealth Causes Genders to Specialize Not Compromise https://t.co/Y0IMH5iPjY