Look, there are feminine theologians (weak), ascendent male philosophers (able), and masculine law-givers (strong). I know what I do. I do law as did Odin. I do law, as did Aristotle. Law states the via negativa, theology states the via-positiva, and philosophy attempts to produce human action that delivers the compromise results.
Source: Original Site Post
-
I know what I do. I do law as did Odin. I do law, as did Aristotle.
-
I know what I do. I do law as did Odin. I do law, as did Aristotle.
Look, there are feminine theologians (weak), ascendent male philosophers (able), and masculine law-givers (strong). I know what I do. I do law as did Odin. I do law, as did Aristotle. Law states the via negativa, theology states the via-positiva, and philosophy attempts to produce human action that delivers the compromise results.
-
Man up. Grow up. Do the Work
Man up. Grow up. Do the Work. https://t.co/FVgmYbL5Kf
-
Man up. Grow up. Do the Work.
—“Your writing is difficult to read because it’s unreadable.”—@Slackhurst
Not true: millions of people watch it, thousands read it, hundreds learn from it, dozens of compete with it, and a handful now teach it. So you are only a measure of your own ignorance and inability. I write for leaders – not pop theology, philosophy, or therapy for the whining weak. Man up. Grow up. Do the Work.
-
Man up. Grow up. Do the Work.
—“Your writing is difficult to read because it’s unreadable.”—@Slackhurst
Not true: millions of people watch it, thousands read it, hundreds learn from it, dozens of compete with it, and a handful now teach it. So you are only a measure of your own ignorance and inability. I write for leaders – not pop theology, philosophy, or therapy for the whining weak. Man up. Grow up. Do the Work.
-
“Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Ma
—“Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Makes for easy alignment with the martyrdom of victim signal parasitism.”—Luke Weinhagen
-
“Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Ma
—“Guilt based religion demands there be victims to provide a source for guilt. Makes for easy alignment with the martyrdom of victim signal parasitism.”—Luke Weinhagen
-
Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality
Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality https://t.co/q7EMHVNLlZ
-
Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality
Nov 7, 2019, 9:53 AM
—“It’s a modality of life that can go either way but has apply universally. I think we currently have the worst of both worlds. No reciprocity.”—Tyrone Jackson @cashmoneyglock
You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law. We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance. We might argue that the state, through contractual asymmetric enforcement (bundling, optimistic presentation without warranty and responsibility-liability, entrapments, penalty clauses etc ) permits and facilitates ir-recipprocity in commerce, but we cannot make the case that the state or economy produces irreciprocal conditions. Just the opposite. I am not going to let the left ‘mal-appropriate’ Reciprocity the way they have inverted rule-of-law, liberalism, freedom, equality, into explicit lies. Morality = Reciprocity within the Limits of Proportionality. Reciprocity increases, and Disproportionality Decreases, Cohesion. The Entrepreneurial billionaires’ aren’t the problem. The multi-millionaries in the financial sector are – and every single one of them is a parasite upon our people.