Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Case for Fascism šŸ˜‰

    Nov 5, 2019, 9:10 AM

    —“Do NOT let fear of communism drive you into fascism.”—Stefan Molyneux

    If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T. One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage. This “Fascism” prevents consumption of accumulated genetic, personal, shareheld, common, social, portable, fixed, territorial, and institutional capital advocated by immoral libertarians under free trade, open borders, and the sophism of non aggression w/o including ALL capital. So if “Fascism” means intolerance that means Rule of Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, for individual, family, clan, tribe, and nation including familial, social, normative, traditional, institutional, genetic capital the aggressive, zero-tolerance, prosecution = Optimum Life. So yes, I want, all moral men want, “Fascism” if “Fascism” is Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Markets in Everything, intolerance for Monopoly of Abrahamic undermining by parasitisms of universalism, judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism, and lying. And that includes prosecution of those who would cast that Fascism (Intolerance) as Immoral, Unethical, Undesirable, who by doing so conspires with our ancient enemies to Underming (Again) our great civilization, by granting license for fomentation of crimes against our people. So “I pray thee take heed” that you do not conspire, even in ignorance, regardless of your intentions, with ancient enemies, whose strategy is to incite monopoly, tyranny, irreciprocity, parasitism, ignorance, sophism, superstition, pseudoscience, and denial to destroy us AGAIN. Because THE LAW does not forgive ignorance of The Law, and when prosecution, restitution, punishment, and prevention are soon restored, those who conspire, in ignorance or not, intent or not, willingly or not, shall be punished – all the same. And what restitution for genocide? So you are either a Fascist for the Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity or you are the enemy of mankind, and you have confessed your guilt, and those of us who can, shall have no mercy in restitution, punishment, and prevention of imitators by making an example of you.

  • The Case for Fascism šŸ˜‰

    Nov 5, 2019, 9:10 AM

    —“Do NOT let fear of communism drive you into fascism.”—Stefan Molyneux

    If FASCISM is: Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Sanctity of the Commons, The Intergenerational Family, Zero-Tolerance and Jury; Social, Economic,and Political Nationalism; State Credit, Investment, Returns on Industrial Capital; Pragmatic Autarky – that’s PERFECT GOV’T. One cannot morally argue against Rule of Law by Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, where the court and jury provide a market for punishment(court) in competition with the market for rewards(the market proper), & where exists a prohibition against imposition by arbitrage. This “Fascism” prevents consumption of accumulated genetic, personal, shareheld, common, social, portable, fixed, territorial, and institutional capital advocated by immoral libertarians under free trade, open borders, and the sophism of non aggression w/o including ALL capital. So if “Fascism” means intolerance that means Rule of Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, for individual, family, clan, tribe, and nation including familial, social, normative, traditional, institutional, genetic capital the aggressive, zero-tolerance, prosecution = Optimum Life. So yes, I want, all moral men want, “Fascism” if “Fascism” is Rule of Law of Reciprocity, Markets in Everything, intolerance for Monopoly of Abrahamic undermining by parasitisms of universalism, judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism, and lying. And that includes prosecution of those who would cast that Fascism (Intolerance) as Immoral, Unethical, Undesirable, who by doing so conspires with our ancient enemies to Underming (Again) our great civilization, by granting license for fomentation of crimes against our people. So “I pray thee take heed” that you do not conspire, even in ignorance, regardless of your intentions, with ancient enemies, whose strategy is to incite monopoly, tyranny, irreciprocity, parasitism, ignorance, sophism, superstition, pseudoscience, and denial to destroy us AGAIN. Because THE LAW does not forgive ignorance of The Law, and when prosecution, restitution, punishment, and prevention are soon restored, those who conspire, in ignorance or not, intent or not, willingly or not, shall be punished – all the same. And what restitution for genocide? So you are either a Fascist for the Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity or you are the enemy of mankind, and you have confessed your guilt, and those of us who can, shall have no mercy in restitution, punishment, and prevention of imitators by making an example of you.

  • The Answer Iā€™m Looking for From Christians

    The Answer Iā€™m Looking for From Christians https://t.co/Wm8z8HJUWy

  • The Answer I’m Looking for From Christians

    —“I’m a devout Roman Catholic man. If a peaceful separation of left and non parasitic producers into two or three separate countries doesn’t occur, I will absolutely, without question, take up arms and fight. …. I flat refuse to let my children be raised in the same filth and evil I’ve witnessed as an adult. And I do not want the fruit of their labor to pad the pockets of a giant mega corporation or a slime bag parasite as my labor has. They will keep what they earn, and part with it because they are realizing a trade that is in their best interest.”— a friend

  • The Answer I’m Looking for From Christians

    —“I’m a devout Roman Catholic man. If a peaceful separation of left and non parasitic producers into two or three separate countries doesn’t occur, I will absolutely, without question, take up arms and fight. …. I flat refuse to let my children be raised in the same filth and evil I’ve witnessed as an adult. And I do not want the fruit of their labor to pad the pockets of a giant mega corporation or a slime bag parasite as my labor has. They will keep what they earn, and part with it because they are realizing a trade that is in their best interest.”— a friend

  • Jesus

    Jesus https://t.co/WXKoykL7ZQ

  • Jesus

      While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s important for mankind. Every other person who tried to deliver that message whether european, or hindu or buddhist, sinic or semite failed – spectacularly. I do true. That’s all have to do. True is always better. ALl of history is excessively concerned with good even if false. I do true. Jesus is correct because made a true claim in the only language and paradigm he understood. I don’t have that problem. I can speak in parsimonious natural law and say he spoke a truth even if not truthfully – simply because he couldn’t. Unfortunately his insight was used to destroy and decline rather than expand and improve. Which is something we can do that he couldn’t.

  • Jesus

      While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s important for mankind. Every other person who tried to deliver that message whether european, or hindu or buddhist, sinic or semite failed – spectacularly. I do true. That’s all have to do. True is always better. ALl of history is excessively concerned with good even if false. I do true. Jesus is correct because made a true claim in the only language and paradigm he understood. I don’t have that problem. I can speak in parsimonious natural law and say he spoke a truth even if not truthfully – simply because he couldn’t. Unfortunately his insight was used to destroy and decline rather than expand and improve. Which is something we can do that he couldn’t.

  • Roman Weeks vs Usa Current, and Future Weeks and Why?

    Roman Weeks vs Usa Current, and Future Weeks and Why? https://t.co/p6HRmC7UKE

  • Roman Weeks vs Usa Current, and Future Weeks and Why?

    Nov 5, 2019, 1:42 PM ROMAN WEEKS VS USA CURRENT, AND FUTURE WEEKS AND WHY? AFAIK: OPTIMUM CALENDAR: 13 * 4wk, 7day Months is pretty optimum in modernity. 5 * 6hr work days wit 1hr break, are maximum human productivity at current work rates (hard). Tohse of us who are elites will always work more – because we love to. 4 * 6hr work days, and three days off reconstructs the family unit. Even if both parents work. This should be possible with automation and exit of the underclasses. End summer vacations for schools and universities, and increase vacations throughout the year for all. WHY IS THIS MISLEADING? because (a) indoctrination into the culture (which matters), (b) the necessity of ‘being open for business’ the maximum amount of hours, therefore seizing the maximum number of opportunities, is a competitive necessity unless not only the whole country does it (see Cyprus – which is an outlier) or the whole world does it (seven day weeks). Because ‘availability’ is in fact a competitive advantage. So the problem remains one of competing with others externally for opportunity via availability, competing with others internally for access to opportunity, experience and information, so that ‘not being there’ is a disadvantage over those who ‘are there’ – and there is nothing that can stop it whatsoever – except legislatively and therefore universally leveling the playing field. So if you want it, that’s the answer. So anyone’s job that is driven by opportunity (sales, executive), and private professionals who want to work will work whatever they want for as much as they want, and people who not opportunity but production oriented, such as managerial, administrative, clerical, craftsman, labor, and service will work regularly because frankly YOU ARE SUBSTITUTABLE. That’s why you will always make less income that NON-SUBSTITUTABLE pepole. And it’s why non-substitutable people make more money: because ten percent of the people do ROMAN CALENDAR The Romans did not recognize the week as a unit of time, so didn’t have weekends. The Romans had months, which they divided up by specially named days: Kalends(1st), Nones(~5th/7th), and Ides(~13th/15th). The time of these was probably originally based on phases of the moon. The Kalends was always the first day of the month. The Nones were eight days before the Ides, on either the 5th or 7th of the month. The Ides were thought to have originally coincided with the full moon, and fell on the 15th of months with 31 days, and otherwise on the 13th. These were not treated as holidays; they were purely for identifying days in the month. Instead of saying, “It’s Monday,” the Romans would say, “It’s sixteen days before the Kalends of September.” They always counted backwards, and inclusively. As for workdays vs holidays, the Romans celebrated many fixed holidays (feriae), as well as ones that were simply declared. Most were religious, at least in name, and were occasions when at least some people did not work. In some cases, games were held, often funded by the wealthy, perhaps with the goal of getting votes. There were nearly 180 of these held during a typical year, and though every worker did not take every one of these days off, there were many opportunities to have a day off here and there. Roman work days: 365days – 180days = 185days = ~15 Days a Month work, ~15 days off. (this isn’t likely). It’s more likely 20-22, with every day for hand to mouth people, who didn’t run a farm. Americans work ~21 days a month including holidays. One thing to remember: there were no laws limiting how many hours or days an employee could work, what they must be paid, or how many days off they must have. People who were not slaves lived hand to mouth, and probably could not take a lot of days off for economic reasons.