Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Enemy’s Strategy

    1. The expansion of the technique invented by usury into a group strategy for the destruction of civilizations, and the reversal of human evolution, restoring man to condition of animal.

    2. Baiting in to Hazard, by use of False Promise, Argued by Sophism, Under cover of Moral Pretense, Justified by Critique, for the purpose of profiting from undermining truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political has been consumed by expansion of the underclasses whose reproduction had been limited by productivity, law, property, market, natural aristocracy.

    3. The female group strategy of undermining organizations of males that are producing eugenic civilization (quality), by the direction of proceeds of production to the production of returns on commons, at the expense of female dysgenic reproduction (quantity), and her irresistible hyperconsumption.

    List the false promises of the enemy? It’s a long list.

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    The Enemy’s Technique https://t.co/HlDGMTo0n0

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk); By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under cover of Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning) Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, Thereby; …creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated assets: …genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political; have been consumed; by expansion of the underclasses; whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    Baiting in to Hazard (certain risk); By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under cover of Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw manning) Under cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From consumption of accumulated assets (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, Thereby; …creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, Authority that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated assets: …genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political; have been consumed; by expansion of the underclasses; whose reproduction or invasion, had been limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy.

  • 2020-06-01

    https://t.co/TdnLhGPCY8

  • Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills Is there some other wa

    Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM

    —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills

    Is there some other way of demonstrating that a body of text is an excerpt from a larger body of text, thereby informing the reader that there is more to be known if desired? Is there some reason I shouldn’t disambiguate new content from repeated content? Is there some reason that salient ideas and arguments often buried in longer works, overlooked in reading, or ignored because of length, should not be promoted to quoted excerpt such that those with less time or patience can make use of them? Is there some reason I shouldn’t include both image and text so that either can be shared depending upon the medium its shared upon? Is there some reason that I shouldn’t use these quotes (short) excerpts (longer) in image form for marketing the ideas in feeds like twitter? I thought so.

  • Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills Is there some other wa

    Oct 31, 2019, 8:09 AM

    —“Quoting yourself?”—Chip Sills

    Is there some other way of demonstrating that a body of text is an excerpt from a larger body of text, thereby informing the reader that there is more to be known if desired? Is there some reason I shouldn’t disambiguate new content from repeated content? Is there some reason that salient ideas and arguments often buried in longer works, overlooked in reading, or ignored because of length, should not be promoted to quoted excerpt such that those with less time or patience can make use of them? Is there some reason I shouldn’t include both image and text so that either can be shared depending upon the medium its shared upon? Is there some reason that I shouldn’t use these quotes (short) excerpts (longer) in image form for marketing the ideas in feeds like twitter? I thought so.

  • The Audience Is ‘everyone Able, and No One Unable’

    The Audience Is ‘everyone Able, and No One Unable’. https://t.co/QSxMnRfR1e

  • The Audience Is ‘everyone Able, and No One Unable’.

    —“Seriously, why don’t you write in sentences, the layperson can understand? Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to carry dictionary or Thesaurus around with them. Again, seriously, who is your audience?”—

    Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means? For some of you, an explanation is required. For others, a set of bullet points is required. For others an aphorism is required. For others a diagram is required. Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose. I can read the equations that capture the entire description of the physical universe. Other people need prose, and others videos, and others cartoons. The audience is ‘everyone able, and no one unable’.

  • The Audience Is ‘everyone Able, and No One Unable’.

    —“Seriously, why don’t you write in sentences, the layperson can understand? Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to carry dictionary or Thesaurus around with them. Again, seriously, who is your audience?”—

    Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means? For some of you, an explanation is required. For others, a set of bullet points is required. For others an aphorism is required. For others a diagram is required. Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose. I can read the equations that capture the entire description of the physical universe. Other people need prose, and others videos, and others cartoons. The audience is ‘everyone able, and no one unable’.