TRUTH IN HUMOR: THE HISTORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL WARFARE (or “We wuz pirates!”) The Templars started out as ‘the poor knights’ as shown by two men on horseback. The Hospitaliers were not poor. They had money, arms, fleets of ships, and took territory. The Vikings were entrepreneurial warriors. The romans were entrepreneurial conquerors. The Greeks were entrepreneurial warriors. The indo europeans were entrepreneurial conquerors. Why do you think we live under the long tradition of Severity, Reciprocity, Jury, Truth, Duty, and Contract? Because we have descended from entrepreneurial warfare. Now if I could just get my fellow western MEN to understand that we are historically entrepreneurial warriors – colonialists, pirates, vikings, in every age, and that it was only the Peace of Westphalia under which our ancestors prohibited us from ‘entrepreneurial war’, and limited warfare to the states. Russia, Iran, and the Muslims and the Jews have broken the Peace of Westphalia, and returned us to a war of all against all, which is the reason for our continuous defeat in central asia and the middle east. To restore our people we must return to our long tradition in the industrialization of ‘entrepreneurial warfare’. Meaning “war for adventure, fun, and profit”. It’s the civic nationalists and the christians so cuckolded that they can’t comprehend this – and those of us who are ‘aryans’, ‘pagans’, ‘raiders’, ‘pirates’ and ‘conquerors and colonizers’ and natural entrepreneurial warriors that are willing to return to ‘revolution as a for profit industry”. This is why you want leaders. You’re still ‘Cucks’ to the state and the ‘church’. You need permission. But European Men don’t need leaders to hoist the jolly roger, pillage, plunder, and burn the house down. To engage in conquest for fun and profit? Only cowards do. 😉 Happy to ‘knight’ you if it’ll make you feel better.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Truth in Humor: The History of Entrepreneurial Warfare
TRUTH IN HUMOR: THE HISTORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL WARFARE (or “We wuz pirates!”) The Templars started out as ‘the poor knights’ as shown by two men on horseback. The Hospitaliers were not poor. They had money, arms, fleets of ships, and took territory. The Vikings were entrepreneurial warriors. The romans were entrepreneurial conquerors. The Greeks were entrepreneurial warriors. The indo europeans were entrepreneurial conquerors. Why do you think we live under the long tradition of Severity, Reciprocity, Jury, Truth, Duty, and Contract? Because we have descended from entrepreneurial warfare. Now if I could just get my fellow western MEN to understand that we are historically entrepreneurial warriors – colonialists, pirates, vikings, in every age, and that it was only the Peace of Westphalia under which our ancestors prohibited us from ‘entrepreneurial war’, and limited warfare to the states. Russia, Iran, and the Muslims and the Jews have broken the Peace of Westphalia, and returned us to a war of all against all, which is the reason for our continuous defeat in central asia and the middle east. To restore our people we must return to our long tradition in the industrialization of ‘entrepreneurial warfare’. Meaning “war for adventure, fun, and profit”. It’s the civic nationalists and the christians so cuckolded that they can’t comprehend this – and those of us who are ‘aryans’, ‘pagans’, ‘raiders’, ‘pirates’ and ‘conquerors and colonizers’ and natural entrepreneurial warriors that are willing to return to ‘revolution as a for profit industry”. This is why you want leaders. You’re still ‘Cucks’ to the state and the ‘church’. You need permission. But European Men don’t need leaders to hoist the jolly roger, pillage, plunder, and burn the house down. To engage in conquest for fun and profit? Only cowards do. 😉 Happy to ‘knight’ you if it’ll make you feel better.
-
Our Denial of Natural Classes
Our Denial of Natural Classes https://t.co/zujGBtOnW0
-
Our Denial of Natural Classes
Hmm.. our denial of natural classes and the western tradition of tripartism (now quadripartism) and the differences in ability between those classes has been created by the marxist(class), feminist (gender) postmodernist (identity, race) project to undermine class cooperation that allows for at least some class rotation, rather than preventing it with castes.
-
Our Denial of Natural Classes
Hmm.. our denial of natural classes and the western tradition of tripartism (now quadripartism) and the differences in ability between those classes has been created by the marxist(class), feminist (gender) postmodernist (identity, race) project to undermine class cooperation that allows for at least some class rotation, rather than preventing it with castes.
-
Usury
Usury https://t.co/iu16zRsPU2
-
Usury
USURY (repost) Interest vs Usury. Interest is necessary for the organization of complex production. it is beneficial for production of generations. It is risky for the purpose of consumption. It is harmful for the production of entertainment. It is very harmful for the production of anti-social behaviors. What demarcates Interest from Usury? (a) credit for consumption rather than production. (b) borrower beware rather than lender beware. (c) collateral If lending is limited to production, lender risk, and un-recoverability for anything other than fraud, then it’s shared risk. And it increases use of stock markets where access to liquidity is possible instead of collateral recovery. The enemy’s technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard, by the extension of credit for the purpose of consumption, the use of collateral, and the use of the court to transfer assets to the lender. The enemy’s technique uses every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and critique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional
-
Usury
USURY (repost) Interest vs Usury. Interest is necessary for the organization of complex production. it is beneficial for production of generations. It is risky for the purpose of consumption. It is harmful for the production of entertainment. It is very harmful for the production of anti-social behaviors. What demarcates Interest from Usury? (a) credit for consumption rather than production. (b) borrower beware rather than lender beware. (c) collateral If lending is limited to production, lender risk, and un-recoverability for anything other than fraud, then it’s shared risk. And it increases use of stock markets where access to liquidity is possible instead of collateral recovery. The enemy’s technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard, by the extension of credit for the purpose of consumption, the use of collateral, and the use of the court to transfer assets to the lender. The enemy’s technique uses every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and critique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional
-
Why Define Natural Rights?
Why Define Natural Rights? https://t.co/X2IeCXLg8T
-
Why Define Natural Rights?
Just as entropy must be articulated as physics, chemistry, biology, etc, Natural Law must be articulated as natural rights for the simple reason that it’s not possible to correctly deduce all applications of entropy without the requisite domain knowledge, or is it possible to correctly deduce all applications of reciprocity without requisite domain knowledge – although when stated that way it’s kind of helpful.