Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • “Terminology comes after knowledge, not before; it’s the philosophical knowledge

    —“Terminology comes after knowledge, not before; it’s the philosophical knowledge they lack, not terminology.”—Drew John

    Possibly, although paradigms and terms form systems of comparison and measurement. And moreover, although sophism and idealism in philosophy are it’s curse, and I’ve tried I think successfully to solve that which is why I’m no longer sure of the demarcation between philosophy, science, testimony, and law. As far as I know the last stronghold of philosophy was truth, and it turns out it’s a scientific discipline, and as such philosophy is now a matter of preference, good, and choice, and math, operational logic, science, economics, and law have fully separated from philosophy. Hopefully relegating philosophy to choice preference and good, will end it’s use for sophism.

  • “Terminology comes after knowledge, not before; it’s the philosophical knowledge

    —“Terminology comes after knowledge, not before; it’s the philosophical knowledge they lack, not terminology.”—Drew John

    Possibly, although paradigms and terms form systems of comparison and measurement. And moreover, although sophism and idealism in philosophy are it’s curse, and I’ve tried I think successfully to solve that which is why I’m no longer sure of the demarcation between philosophy, science, testimony, and law. As far as I know the last stronghold of philosophy was truth, and it turns out it’s a scientific discipline, and as such philosophy is now a matter of preference, good, and choice, and math, operational logic, science, economics, and law have fully separated from philosophy. Hopefully relegating philosophy to choice preference and good, will end it’s use for sophism.

  • Truth About Human Beings

    Truth About Human Beings https://t.co/vjArFvmCwT

  • Truth About Human Beings

    Oct 24, 2019, 8:20 PM People are rational actors acting in their rational self interests, that observe the minimum conformance to rule, procedure, norm, tradition, regulation, legislation, and law, necessary to preserve their status in the social order. Period. End of Story. Good luck falsifying it. People are not good, ethical, or moral. They are amoral. They discover what is in their self interest within the environmental limits and congratulate themselves for the content of their character (self image). This is the empirical evidence from all people in all cultures, in all countries, in all civilizations, across all of history. The civilization of man was performed by the incremental provision of incentives to find self congratulation in minimum accomodation of the various systems of rules, by the incremental evolution of law, norm, and custom to suppress as many opportunities for bad, unethical, immoral, conduct as affordable by the polity, and where incentives are possible to construct. Hence the necessity of sheriffs and policemen and populations increased in anonymity. We must govern amoral humans because all are amoral. Ergo we must govern pessimistically so that we continuously evolve the suppression of irreciprocity (the bad, unethical, immoral) as quickly as we evolve new methods of bad, unethical and immoral behavior. Optimism is why progressive governments fail. Edit

  • Truth About Human Beings

    Oct 24, 2019, 8:20 PM People are rational actors acting in their rational self interests, that observe the minimum conformance to rule, procedure, norm, tradition, regulation, legislation, and law, necessary to preserve their status in the social order. Period. End of Story. Good luck falsifying it. People are not good, ethical, or moral. They are amoral. They discover what is in their self interest within the environmental limits and congratulate themselves for the content of their character (self image). This is the empirical evidence from all people in all cultures, in all countries, in all civilizations, across all of history. The civilization of man was performed by the incremental provision of incentives to find self congratulation in minimum accomodation of the various systems of rules, by the incremental evolution of law, norm, and custom to suppress as many opportunities for bad, unethical, immoral, conduct as affordable by the polity, and where incentives are possible to construct. Hence the necessity of sheriffs and policemen and populations increased in anonymity. We must govern amoral humans because all are amoral. Ergo we must govern pessimistically so that we continuously evolve the suppression of irreciprocity (the bad, unethical, immoral) as quickly as we evolve new methods of bad, unethical and immoral behavior. Optimism is why progressive governments fail. Edit

  • We Have a New Smart Guy 😉

    We Have a New Smart Guy 😉 https://t.co/aIS4mpWZtJ

  • We Have a New Smart Guy 😉

    —“You’re not the first person I’ve encountered for whom Hans-Hermann Hoppe was the capstone that raised them from intelligent libertarian to dissident right. Sovereigntarianism is the best fleshed-out dissident right philosophy, with perhaps the only real competitor being Nick Landian Dark Enlightenment/accelerationism. But the latter is far more, shall we say, “Continental,” in its nature and outlook. Someone should go to school and smuggle these ideaspheres into academia—upload these right proper dangerous thought viruses straight into the Cathedral’s mainframe. One appealing to spergs like us, and Landianism appealing to schizos. In fact, I may do that myself.”—Duke Newcomb

  • We Have a New Smart Guy 😉

    —“You’re not the first person I’ve encountered for whom Hans-Hermann Hoppe was the capstone that raised them from intelligent libertarian to dissident right. Sovereigntarianism is the best fleshed-out dissident right philosophy, with perhaps the only real competitor being Nick Landian Dark Enlightenment/accelerationism. But the latter is far more, shall we say, “Continental,” in its nature and outlook. Someone should go to school and smuggle these ideaspheres into academia—upload these right proper dangerous thought viruses straight into the Cathedral’s mainframe. One appealing to spergs like us, and Landianism appealing to schizos. In fact, I may do that myself.”—Duke Newcomb

  • Not if all at once

    Not if all at once.

    Reply addressees: @CruiserGurgess @NoahRevoy

  • Nope. We have better data. Sorry. Just like last time

    Nope. We have better data.
    Sorry. Just like last time.

    Reply addressees: @SheilaG1970 @realDonaldTrump