Source: Original Site Post

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Soverei

    What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty? https://t.co/rJrwEmmoYN

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty?

    WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY? What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century. Everyone wants consumption. No one wants responsibility. Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty?

    WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY? What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century. Everyone wants consumption. No one wants responsibility. Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.

  • It’s Not Money. It’s a Divisible Token. and That’s Fine

    It’s Not Money. It’s a Divisible Token. and That’s Fine https://t.co/1izIJGaGtS

  • It’s Not Money. It’s a Divisible Token. and That’s Fine

    IT’S NOT MONEY. IT’S A DIVISIBLE TOKEN. AND THAT’S FINE BTC is not ‘money’ or money substitute. It consists of, AND ONLY OF, a fractionally divisible share in the BTC Single-Stock Exchange that can be used as tokens in transfers of interest. See Token Money, Share, Stock Market. Innovation is (a) digital, (b) divisible (c) a commons.

  • It’s Not Money. It’s a Divisible Token. and That’s Fine

    IT’S NOT MONEY. IT’S A DIVISIBLE TOKEN. AND THAT’S FINE BTC is not ‘money’ or money substitute. It consists of, AND ONLY OF, a fractionally divisible share in the BTC Single-Stock Exchange that can be used as tokens in transfers of interest. See Token Money, Share, Stock Market. Innovation is (a) digital, (b) divisible (c) a commons.

  • “GSRRM” Response

    “GSRRM” Response https://t.co/o7UjVhW5Et

  • “GSRRM” Response

    “GSRRM” RESPONSE

    —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice. I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job not to.

  • “GSRRM” Response

    “GSRRM” RESPONSE

    —“f–cking madness…”—@meta_slayer

    It’s genius actually. It’s describing the female conflcit strategy of undermining truth plus the abrahamic sophism of false promise, baiting in to hazard, profiting from that hazard, and defending it with pilpul, critique, & pretense of innocence under cover of voluntary choice. I don’t make errors. Ever. It’s my job not to.

  • 2020-06-01

    https://t.co/VxosgKRJ24