Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @EmpiresFrontiers @Wanderers_Choice I equate ‘nazi’ with just immaturity, stupid

    @EmpiresFrontiers@Wanderers_Choice

    I equate ‘nazi’ with just immaturity, stupidity, and ignorance.

    If we begin with rule of law by the natural law (as I’ve exhaustively documented it) it results in a nation with all the benefits of national socialism, none of the negative symbolism, and none of the authoritarianism, because (contrary to Schmidt etc) the science says we are right, and that if we launder Christianity of its Judaism the underlying ethic expressed in legal terms is scientifically right.

    In other words, nazism, national socialism, like communism and Woke is an ignorant religion for the dumb folk. We can’t win the middle with a histronic evil cult of dumb folk. The majority middle will fight it to the death.

    BUT …. we can get an even better result without the baggage.

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy.
    Europeanism is the optimum evolutionary strategy.
    Rule of law is the optimum rule strategy.
    And monarchy, cabinet, and houses for the classes is the optimum political strategy,
    And mixed economy combining state time preference and capital, with private time preference and use of capital, is simply the optimum economic order … FOR THOSE WHO CAN DO IT.

    The thing is, you have to be more genetically and culturally evolved to do it. That’s why it’s a more evolved strategy. And so our ‘competitors’ can’t do it. That’s why they rebel against ‘whiteness’. They can’t behaviorally do it.

    So why ‘carry their dysgenic incompetent dead weight’ instead of separating and leaving them behind?

    Just eradicate NS and Naziism and Fascism as a failed strategy and let’s just go with Anglo Legal Science, and increase the suppression of criminality with that legal science.

    Those ‘power words’ just mean you’re a dumb fuck that’s deterministically without exception going to lose – and take down better people with you.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 22:03:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107685359254358527

  • @Sargonofakkad100 That is the best framing I’ve ever heard – and it’s true

    @Sargonofakkad100 That is the best framing I’ve ever heard – and it’s true.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 19:36:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684781966627609

  • @Afterrthought Even ‘just men’ works fine. Even houses for men and women with di

    @Afterrthought Even ‘just men’ works fine. Even houses for men and women with different spheres of influence works. Houses for classes where women are a class works. Economic voting works. The only thing that doesnt’ work is universal equalitarian democracy where the bottom rules.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 19:15:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684699564887916

  • @EmpiresFrontiers @Wanderers_Choice Enough is something on the order of 2M. Suff

    @EmpiresFrontiers@Wanderers_Choice Enough is something on the order of 2M. Sufficient is the 10k that allows us to collect the 25K, to the 100K, to the 1M to the 2M. Mao strategy: recruit the countryside. We only need enough men to produce confindence from recruits. The more we have the more we can get because size decreases uncertainty. However, the point of 2M is to attract enough attention that we can issue demands for corretion under the plausible possibility that we can force those demands. In other words teh value in numbers is that we eliminate the need for civil war. Our proposals (my work) is a moral soluton to the problem of modernity, and it simply restores and reinforces the original constitution which itself was the first written attempt at a scientific government. If we can ‘get attention’ without the nazis or christians ruining it, then we can propose our solution which satisfies the majority center-right and center left, and protects the ‘right’ propert, and only screws over the hard left, academy, financial sector, and the state.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 19:13:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684693760087212

  • @Majestic_Dissipant Yep. After 2008, all of this theory collapsed in the discour

    @Majestic_Dissipant Yep. After 2008, all of this theory collapsed in the discourse, and I’m not really sure why. And after Turchin I’m not really sure why it didn’t advance faster. But economists got awfully quiet after 2008 (for good reason) and they still ahven’t recovered.

    I don’t remember this guy but maybe I should include Elliot wave – i shy away from them because of the commercialization of it.

    So here is the underlying law of the universe you’re looking for that’s mainifesting in the fibonacci sequence, the nautilus shell, the growth of all plants and animals, and all the phenomena in the visible universe:

    The universe can only establish a stable relation as an equilibrium of forces that capture increases in energy as mass. That is its only form of memory. As such EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION proceeds by this method which of course, rather obviously, results in the fibonnaci sequence: accumulation by whatever simple general rule it’s accumulating by.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 19:07:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684669891690251

  • THE PROBLEM OF PEACEFUL MORAL SEPARATION OR RESTORATION If I can get you (all) ‘

    THE PROBLEM OF PEACEFUL MORAL SEPARATION OR RESTORATION

    If I can get you (all) ‘on message’ that:
    … 1) The jewish strategy is the weaponizing of the female strategy,
    … 2) Women are vulnerable to, seducible by, the female strategy.
    … 3) The jews are the best in the world at warfare by the female strategy,
    … 4) And we can use the Law as I’ve formalized it into a science, to equally suppress the female strategy in society, politics, and war as we have equally suppressed the male strategy in society, politics,and war.

    If I can get enough of you to that point of understeanding then we have a solution that doesn’t involved killing a hundred million people, and gives us the moral high ground.

    I mean, it just says ‘we’re all bots’ no one is to blame because they’re a bot (semi domesticated animal) and we just need to increase the constraints on the expression of female warfare as we have to male warfare – and that it’s possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 18:56:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684625364971720

  • @EmpiresFrontiers @Wanderers_Choice Correct. But if I can get you ‘on message’ t

    @EmpiresFrontiers@Wanderers_Choice Correct. But if I can get you ‘on message’ that it’s the female strategy, women are vulnerable to the female strategy. the jews are the best in the world at warfare by the female strategy, and we can use the law as I’ve formalized it into a science, to equally suppress the female strategy in society, politics, and war as we have equally suppressed the male strategy in society, politics,and war.

    If I can get enough of you to that point of understeanding then we have a solution that doesn’t involved killing a hundred million people, and gives us the moral high ground. I mean, it just says ‘we’re all bots’ no one is to blame because they’re a bot (semi domesticated animal) and we just need to increase the constraints on the expression of female warfare as we have to male warfare – and that it’s possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 18:54:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684617090952356

  • ARGUING WITH THE MIDWITS — “One of the most critical premises to your whole thi

    ARGUING WITH THE MIDWITS

    — “One of the most critical premises to your whole thing is that **neural adaptability (intelligence)* is largely genetic. Without that, the whole narrative of the left is plausible. Problem is that there is plenty of “science” you can cite to defend the nature side. How do you argue that effectively with midwit?” –*

    I would say instead that the rate of neural adaptiability achieved by evolutionary neoteny (pedomorphism) is the cause of meaningful genetic differences regardelss of race (subspecies, species, whatever). And that this rate of neural adaptiability, the sex differences in cognition, and minor variations in brain and body chemistry combine to produce variations in demonstrated ability and behavior. So yes, to say that neural adaptability is the first principle of human evolutionary competition, and that the classes (and races, and subraces) manifest differences in rate of neural adaptation that we call empathizing vs systematizing, intelligence, concientiousness, and agency (anti-neuroticism). There is no exception to this first principle and first cause of human differences. In general, most mutation is harmful and diveresity and density increase the difficulty in selecting out defects, so defects accumulate in the lower classes.

    (a) we are providing a (The One) most parsimonious universal logic (paradigm, first principles, vocabulary, grammar) built from the one first principle, into all first principles, of all dimensions that unifies the sciences…

    (b) this method allows the falsification of all logical, scientific, AND rational and moral statements one claims is ‘true’ (testifiable as unambiguous, consistent, correspondent, possible, rational, reciprocal, parsimonious complete and within limits.

    (c) In the battle for nature-nurture the science is (very) clear that it’s somewhere above 60% and likely 80% genetic, that the rest is kaleidic, not nurture, and that nurture (c.1) can largely harm genetic expression (c.2) provides no durable change to genetic expression. That’s all period.

    (d) and most importantly, that just as all nurture ‘dissipates’ with time, resulting in a genetic+kaleidic (idiosyncratic) outcome in adulthood independent of nurture.

    (e) Likewise what applies to the individual applies to the polity – we eventually express our genetics at scale over time.

    (f) this is why
    .. (i) mostly what matters is genetics
    .. (ii) most genetics that matters is size, conscientiousness and intelligence (neurological scale and health)
    .. (iii) the genetic expression in your polity has more influence on your condition than you do on your condition.

    (g) the left is cognitively female (empathizing) and so will always apply NAXALT intuition and MOTHER intuition instead of empirical evidence at scale: male systematizing. This is what we see. In other words, the mere popular existence of the left’s argument proves our argument.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 18:44:04 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684576919934696

  • LEARNING CYCLE THEORY (HUMAN POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC DETERMINISM) — “What I’d lo

    LEARNING CYCLE THEORY
    (HUMAN POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC DETERMINISM)

    — “What I’d love is a conversation dedicated to cycle theory and a brief overview of all the cycles concluding and converging in this window until 2030. Keep up the great work.” — KnowingDasEin

    I can do a video on cycle theory, but working with cycles requires a great deal of knowledge. So while we can understand cycle theory, and predict cycles, it takes a great deal of general knowledge to predict what the cycle will produce – even if all our behavior is deterministic.

    I do cover cycles a bit in ‘the book’ and in ‘the course’ but I can certanly do a video at some point:
    (a) introducing cycle theory and explaining:
    (b) ‘the learning and forgetting curve from the individual to the polity” and
    (c) the “generational incentive cycle” all of which lead to the truism that strong men make good times.

    And we can also address (c) the underlying problem that continues regardless of cycles, and that’s the accumulation of calcification in the form of corruption, rent seeking, and free riding, that consumes all avalilable capital, including adaptive capacity of the population, and dooms a civilization when it lacks capital and incentives and behavioral training to adapt to changes or shocks.

    READING FOR THE NERDS:
    Cycle Theory, from simple to hard:

    • Wiki: Kondratiev and Kondratiev Cycles (cartoon).
    • Strauss and Howe – Generations by (intro)
    • Carrol Quigley the Evolution of Civilizations (general)
    • Peter Turchin: Secular Cycles; Complex Population Dynamics. (demographics)
    • Spengler: For Extra Credit – though as a continental he’s got the usual german pessimism. (cultural)
    • More Extra Credit: The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle. (economics)

    That’s it.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 17:14:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684225226925921

  • CIVILIZATION FIRST THINKING (CHRISTENDOM=EUROPA MAGNA) I think our position woul

    CIVILIZATION FIRST THINKING (CHRISTENDOM=EUROPA MAGNA)

    I think our position would be “civilization first” rather than nation first in the sense that the family comes first unless it conflicts with society-polity, and society polity comes first unless it conflicts with nation-federation-empire, and that nation-federation-empire comes first unless it conflicts with civilization. And civilization is the organization of the race.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 16:24:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107684026916782971