Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • P: We Operationalize the Series (statement) Not the Elements (evidence)

    Sep 28, 2019, 8:31 AM P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence)

    —-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter

    (That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.) The Methodology: Disambiguation by Enumeration, Serialization and Operationalization. Serialization provides empirical evidence of the spectrum in a given language, even if some terms must be disambiguated. We operationalize the constant relations expressed in the SERIES, not the elements. So if I list the truth spectrum, identify its constant relations, and state them operationally, I have completed the method. (It’s just like geometry, three points make a line, lines are unambiguous). Which is why you see me using geometry in everything. It’s a higher (less ambiguous) standard of measurement. Or said differently, geometry constitutes the most complete grammar we have, and sets are a means of producing ideals and sophism. Or better: all language is measurement. The question is only the precision of the measures. P is the most precise n-dimensional language we have.

  • A Question About the Cortex

    A Question About the Cortex https://t.co/kCHzJcfTXK

  • A Question About the Cortex

    A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX

    —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist @Nationalist7346

    No.

    1. the outer layer of the cortex is just a couple of mm thick; consists two functions (what,where), using six layers; divided into columns and modules (groups of columns); homogenous in structure but differing in neural density by physical origin of nerves that enter them.

    2. So no it’s not fractal: the average size of a human cortex, if laid out flat would be approximately the size of a dinner napkin, and just as thick. The rest of the neocortex consists entirely of white matter (nerve fibers: axons) which connect everything to everything.

    3. With the hippocampus consolidating and organizing information, and then using rehearsal (replay) to encode episodes of memory, and thalamus controlling attention (what gets thru to the neocortex for computation, and basal ganglia that surrounds both releasing physical actions.

    4. Most of the advanced functions of the brain consist of these three ‘levers’ and the natural increase in reflection created by increasing brain size, from back (senses) to front (permuting, planning, manipulating). So the brain functions as a series of loops (operating system)

    5. That recursively process a moment of information and merge it with the next moment of information in a continuous stream which we can ‘buffer’ with a half life of just a few seconds, and no more than twenty or so. By Comparison of these moments we discern change in state.

    6. When people say the brain isn’t a computer they’re only a tiny bit right. It does operate in binary (on off) and frequency (hertz), and by competition for attention but with unimaginable numbers of connections in unimaginable parallel, in a continuous loop (OS).

  • A Question About the Cortex

    A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX

    —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist @Nationalist7346

    No.

    1. the outer layer of the cortex is just a couple of mm thick; consists two functions (what,where), using six layers; divided into columns and modules (groups of columns); homogenous in structure but differing in neural density by physical origin of nerves that enter them.

    2. So no it’s not fractal: the average size of a human cortex, if laid out flat would be approximately the size of a dinner napkin, and just as thick. The rest of the neocortex consists entirely of white matter (nerve fibers: axons) which connect everything to everything.

    3. With the hippocampus consolidating and organizing information, and then using rehearsal (replay) to encode episodes of memory, and thalamus controlling attention (what gets thru to the neocortex for computation, and basal ganglia that surrounds both releasing physical actions.

    4. Most of the advanced functions of the brain consist of these three ‘levers’ and the natural increase in reflection created by increasing brain size, from back (senses) to front (permuting, planning, manipulating). So the brain functions as a series of loops (operating system)

    5. That recursively process a moment of information and merge it with the next moment of information in a continuous stream which we can ‘buffer’ with a half life of just a few seconds, and no more than twenty or so. By Comparison of these moments we discern change in state.

    6. When people say the brain isn’t a computer they’re only a tiny bit right. It does operate in binary (on off) and frequency (hertz), and by competition for attention but with unimaginable numbers of connections in unimaginable parallel, in a continuous loop (OS).

  • ORRGSM Is a Resource, Just Like Violence

    ORRGSM Is a Resource, Just Like Violence https://t.co/k1MnGb83IO

  • ORRGSM Is a Resource, Just Like Violence

    GSRRM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.

  • ORRGSM Is a Resource, Just Like Violence

    GSRRM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.

  • Because of The Technique Used to Sell and Argue the Abrahamic Religions

    Because of The Technique Used to Sell and Argue the Abrahamic Religions https://t.co/NpmoeGeEJ8

  • Because of The Technique Used to Sell and Argue the Abrahamic Religions

    BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

    —“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    (Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule) Using the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the old world, and the new world: marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism, with of course, fundamentalist islam persisting. It’s the female method of undermining, rather than western masculine truth and reciprocity. in effect the abrahamic method (undermining) is the primary competitor to european science and chinese reason. It is the art of lying. Study women’s conflict strategy.

    —“I don’t see what that has to do with Abraham.”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    Then maybe you don’t need to. Unless you want to learn the different means by which different civilizations conduct their propaganda (mythology) and group strategy then it’s not important for you. Just learn the technique, learn the technique of western truth, and every civilization employs a system of argument (persuasion) somewhere between european truth and abrahamic lying, with chinese closest to european, followed by hindustani, followed by buddhist followed by abrahamic (middle eastern, monotheistic, supernatural sophism, and its modern reformation in pseudoscience, and sophism). If we use the term rabbinical (who invented it) then we exclude christianity, islam, judaism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, postmoernism, feminism and denialism (political correctness) which are all constructed by the same means. So we use abahamic to encompass both the first generation of abrahamic sophisms (abrahamic religions) and the second generation (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism, political correctness). This (The Gramamars) is one of the foundational methodologies in propertarianism: 0. Enumeration, Serialization, Disambiguation, and Operationalization1. Testimonial Truth and The Grammars of truth and deceit2. Reciprocity, Demonstrated Interest3. Compatibilism4. Strict construction of law5. Perfect Government There is much more than that but that’s about all people can manage at one time.

  • Because of The Technique Used to Sell and Argue the Abrahamic Religions

    BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

    —“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    (Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule) Using the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the old world, and the new world: marxism, socialism, feminism, postmodernism, and denialism, with of course, fundamentalist islam persisting. It’s the female method of undermining, rather than western masculine truth and reciprocity. in effect the abrahamic method (undermining) is the primary competitor to european science and chinese reason. It is the art of lying. Study women’s conflict strategy.

    —“I don’t see what that has to do with Abraham.”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland

    Then maybe you don’t need to. Unless you want to learn the different means by which different civilizations conduct their propaganda (mythology) and group strategy then it’s not important for you. Just learn the technique, learn the technique of western truth, and every civilization employs a system of argument (persuasion) somewhere between european truth and abrahamic lying, with chinese closest to european, followed by hindustani, followed by buddhist followed by abrahamic (middle eastern, monotheistic, supernatural sophism, and its modern reformation in pseudoscience, and sophism). If we use the term rabbinical (who invented it) then we exclude christianity, islam, judaism, marxism, freudianism, boasianism, postmoernism, feminism and denialism (political correctness) which are all constructed by the same means. So we use abahamic to encompass both the first generation of abrahamic sophisms (abrahamic religions) and the second generation (marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism, political correctness). This (The Gramamars) is one of the foundational methodologies in propertarianism: 0. Enumeration, Serialization, Disambiguation, and Operationalization1. Testimonial Truth and The Grammars of truth and deceit2. Reciprocity, Demonstrated Interest3. Compatibilism4. Strict construction of law5. Perfect Government There is much more than that but that’s about all people can manage at one time.