for the same reason the faithful can’t: evidence of the falsehood of their existence.
Reply addressees: @EricLiford @Brandon62525390 @realDonaldTrump
Source: Original Site Post
-
for the same reason the faithful can’t: evidence of the falsehood of their exist
-
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of t
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of the NARRATIVE of history, with the EVIDENCE of history, what the romans wrote, what the germanic wrote, the legal acts, the wills and documents, economic and trade history.
Reply addressees: @Cimbrian400 @AshaLogos -
I separate the Teaching of Jesus from ‘christianity’. Pualianity, Churchianity e
I separate the Teaching of Jesus from ‘christianity’.
Pualianity, Churchianity etc. So I just say teachings of jesus, and I just refer to the Jefferson Bible.
Everyon has a horse in this race so I sort of try to stick with operational names.
Reply addressees: @Cimbrian400 @AshaLogos -
We should have had the industrial revolution before 300. (Alexander shouldn’t ha
We should have had the industrial revolution before 300. (Alexander shouldn’t have crossed the Bosphorus, Rome shouldn’t into the Levant. Rome should have exterminated the Christians. Europe completed the Crusades. The Russians, Constantinople. Trade greed suppresses innovation.)
Reply addressees: @JayMan471 -
The New Constitution (set of amendments that repair the constitution), will prod
The New Constitution (set of amendments that repair the constitution), will produce the greatest redistribution of power distance, wealth, and sovereignty to the people since the Roman Reforms. There is something for everyone – except the elites. Who will be destroyed by it.
-
The New Constitution (set of amendments that repair the constitution), contains
The New Constitution (set of amendments that repair the constitution), contains the a menu of choices. I suggest the optimum. The people can choose the utilitarian. The difference is, the people will understand the choice they’re making and the consequences of it.
-
If people understood what as done to their constitution and law, to their financ
If people understood what as done to their constitution and law, to their finance and economy, to the information depend on, to their ability to reproduce, and their social order, political order and civilization, they would hang liberals like ornaments from every post and tree.
-
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundation
Three is more intellectual consistency to P than there is to even the foundations of mathematics (sets), for the simple reason that it’s constrained by realism, naturalism, and operationalism (actions) in addition to identity, logic, empiricism, incentives, and reciprocity.
-
The New Constitution (or rather set of amendments that repair the constitution),
The New Constitution (or rather set of amendments that repair the constitution), is Scientific, Judicial, Precise, Expository, and completely devoid of pandering, and as such has more truth in it that most people can tolerate in one sitting. There is a very good reason for it.
-
See. You’re talkin’ statistics. 😉 I’m talking formal logic. Lots of grammars ou
See. You’re talkin’ statistics. 😉
I’m talking formal logic.
Lots of grammars out there.
Reply addressees: @KratosIrkalla