Jessica … take me another couple of days to move the rest of the content into the documents but you can see where it’s going. 😉 -cheers
Reply addressees: @jessica_isback
Source: Original Site Post
-
Jessica … take me another couple of days to move the rest of the content into
-
Do you for one minute think that the kind of person that builds multiple compani
Do you for one minute think that the kind of person that builds multiple companies, then works for decades to produce a reformation of our law in excruciating detail does not have the plan for not only enforcement but winning a conflict?
We announce. They decline. We fight.
Reply addressees: @PTL36497649 -
PREVIEW THE SECOND DECLARATION! Join us on July 4th
PREVIEW THE SECOND DECLARATION!
Join us on July 4th
https://t.co/1TNtVbsNLP -
Though you are welcome to demonstrate how the method I’m using fails tests of id
Though you are welcome to demonstrate how the method I’m using fails tests of identity, internal consistency, actionability, observability, rational choice, reciprocity, limits, completeness and warrantability. (good luck. I’m the expert in the field.)
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 -
So define internal consistency (you see, you’re talking scripture and verbalism
So define internal consistency (you see, you’re talking scripture and verbalism (imaginary), not action(demonstrable).
That’s where abrahamism originated. lying to defend the omniscience of scripture.
That’s why law originated. because it’s demonstrated not words.
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 -
You don’t understand. Humans can only testify to realism, naturalism, identity,
You don’t understand. Humans can only testify to realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, actionability, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, in stated limits, fully accounted, and warrantied by due diligence. Your Fail: There is no closure to logic.
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 -
So while I can demonstrate that I’m not lying – you can’t demonstrate you’re not
So while I can demonstrate that I’m not lying – you can’t demonstrate you’re not lying. In fact, thats what the abrahamic method of deceit teaches you: The art of lying.
Which is the whole problem.
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 -
In other words, truth is only produced by survival from adversarial competition
In other words, truth is only produced by survival from adversarial competition – and thats why court and science that is derived from court, functions by adversarialism.
Because people like you lie by sophistry. And you even are dim enough to believe it.
Dunning Kruger Rules
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 -
Nope. One doesn’t prove anything. (justification fallacy). Proof is impossible.
Nope. One doesn’t prove anything. (justification fallacy). Proof is impossible. Instead, one can demonstrate, and one can testify to demonstrability,even if demonstrability by measurement and deduction. So the fallacy is proof, rather than falsifiability, survival, and testimony.
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346 -
You aren’t understanding. Your notion that the behavior of natural phenomena isn
You aren’t understanding. Your notion that the behavior of natural phenomena isn’t consistent (regular, deterministic) is untestifiable and indistinguishable from lying. Worse, we know there’s no undiscovered means of information transmission at physical scales. It’s Game Over.
Reply addressees: @HenryMalcom4 @KSI_HEADHUNT3R @Nationalist7346