Because Truth Before Face educates, and forces us to solve problems, not ignore them until they explode into crises like this.
Truth is enough. No more lies.
Reply addressees: @DonnieDopeNeedl @CruiserGurgess @MrMatt444 @RightSide4Life @frendiferous @KeithWoodsYT
Source: Original Site Post
-
Because Truth Before Face educates, and forces us to solve problems, not ignore
-
That’s means identities are good in separate polities and destructive within pol
That’s means identities are good in separate polities and destructive within polities. That’s why we say ‘a thousand nations bloom” This includes white folk of all biases of course.But it’s not an identitarian movement. It does attract identitarians. B/c we say they’re not wrong.
Reply addressees: @CruiserGurgess @DonnieDopeNeedl @MrMatt444 @RightSide4Life @frendiferous @KeithWoodsYT -
Yeah. Science says small homogenous nation-states, under rule of law, produce th
Yeah. Science says small homogenous nation-states, under rule of law, produce the best commons, for very predictable reason – no frications to redistribution, because effectively no competitors for social, political power, and economic delta is minimized by redistribution.
Reply addressees: @CruiserGurgess @DonnieDopeNeedl @MrMatt444 @RightSide4Life @frendiferous @KeithWoodsYT -
Let me help you. Your system of lies is dependent upon justification of priors a
Let me help you. Your system of lies is dependent upon justification of priors and conflation of truth with preference.
I use adversarialism (science, logic, and law).
Boom. 😉
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary -
Because women throw themselves at me, in desperate search to capture my genes, a
Because women throw themselves at me, in desperate search to capture my genes, and I am too good-natured to resist them.
Return to the central argument and demonstrate you fear it: falsify reciprocity as an immutable law of logic and nature.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary -
It is falsifiable, find any rational choice that is irreciprocal. It’s possible.
It is falsifiable, find any rational choice that is irreciprocal. It’s possible. You can’t.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary -
Again, the way to show Abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism,denialism)
Again, the way to show Abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism,denialism) is to return to the central argument and demonstrate they fear it: falsify reciprocity as an immutable law of logic and nature.
(All that is required is sufficient force to make conflict intolerable)
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 -
Again, the way to show abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism, denialism)
Again, the way to show abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism, denialism) is to return to the central argument and demonstrate they fear it: falsify reciprocity as an immutable law of logic and nature.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 -
I’m still waiting for you to falsify the test of Reciprocity rather than resort
I’m still waiting for you to falsify the test of Reciprocity rather than resort to the female technique of lying by Pilpul, Critique, GSRRM. 😉
And I have three ex wives, three kids and am a 1%er.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary -
I don’t do religion. I science, testimony, law. The reason you don’t answer is t
I don’t do religion. I science, testimony, law. The reason you don’t answer is that if you even try it will falsify your frame.
AFAIK I am the current specialist the Abrahamic (theology), Marxist (pseudoscience), postmodern (Sophistry), technique of lying by false promise.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420