You don’t know much about war do you? Do intel agents, generals, and politicians meet with the enemy? Of course, they do. Endlessly.
The only ground given was by you. The enemy was disarmed – with pandering words. We took their victory.
You gave it to them. You. By whining.
Reply addressees: @Brandon62525390
Source: Original Site Post
-
You don’t know much about war do you? Do intel agents, generals, and politicians
-
Eric uses my photo for the same reason john used his helmet – disguise. 😉
Eric uses my photo for the same reason john used his helmet – disguise. 😉
Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You -
( correct. it’s not an accident. ) 😉
( correct. it’s not an accident. ) 😉
Reply addressees: @alessandro_haas @Hail__To_You -
I mean, the people with YT channels calling me a fed are the one’s making money
I mean, the people with YT channels calling me a fed are the one’s making money by doing so, right? The Russians started it but Intel uses it: the best way to undermine a movement is to pay fringe groups to undermine it for you.
Aren’t Keith, Nick, and that Well Being guy paid???
Reply addressees: @RapistNigga -
Getting suckered by the feds so that you don’t show up and take control of the n
Getting suckered by the feds so that you don’t show up and take control of the narrative, is pretty lame, don’t you think? What’s more likely: I spend most of my life reforming constitutional law, or people (like Kieth) calling me Fed are paid by the Feds to undermine the work?
Reply addressees: @RapistNigga -
You didn’t read the article, did you? 😉
You didn’t read the article, did you? 😉
Reply addressees: @RebelRancher @CatherineSoph13 -
You sold me out when you wanted short term emotional symbolism rather than long
You sold me out when you wanted short term emotional symbolism rather than long term success. If you want symbolism join a riot, get put in jail, pay the legal fees, and show that the enemy is powerful. If you want success, pander to the enemy, make them weak, and keep growing.
Reply addressees: @Brandon62525390 -
(I understood this when learning Hayekian triangles and Gary Stanley becker’s wo
(I understood this when learning Hayekian triangles and Gary Stanley becker’s work on social phenomenon. The world invented calculus and econ in the age of sail and industry. It accounted for the increase in scale, monetary accounting for time, but not for the change in time.
Reply addressees: @TaylorPearsonMe @ole_b_peters @nature -
So between using the wrong calculus(Weinstein), not using computation (wolfram),
So between using the wrong calculus(Weinstein), not using computation (wolfram), and not discovering the necessary time as a system of measurement (Ergodicity, Peters) we are a generation away from achieving in econ what we have in physics, and using supercomputers to do it.
Reply addressees: @TaylorPearsonMe @ole_b_peters @nature -
Two popular heterodox thinkers (Weinstein in calculus and econ, and Wolfram in c
Two popular heterodox thinkers (Weinstein in calculus and econ, and Wolfram in computation and physics) have approached the question differently. Ergodicity draws our emphasis closer to the underlying problem, which is that the system of measurement for cooperation is hard: TIME.
Reply addressees: @TaylorPearsonMe @ole_b_peters @nature