Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • THE REAL HISTORY OF SLAVERY

    THE REAL HISTORY OF SLAVERY

    https://t.co/PeZQk9tkl6

  • Lessons Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western Renaissance

    Lessons Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western Renaissance https://t.co/MFleaq0yiJ

  • Lessons Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western Renaissance

    REGARDING: #Pantsgate – Propertarian July 4th Declaration Analysis

    http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbHKU-FllNo

    Great Leadership. Great insight. Lessons Understood. Thank you.

    As for the Problem with Intellectuals: It’s true. This has been an intellectual movement. I am an intellectual and Entrepreneur. I’ve only shifted to the political because it seems no one else will take a political stand, provide a solution other than outrage, or organize a revolutionary body to demand that solution – which is the only means of avoiding bloodshed and destruction (or outright losing).
    I think you’ve identified the problem. And yes, you’ve shown I did in fact have a blind spot.  Because I don’t even SENSE social dominance. Because in my universe only intellectual dominance exists. And in that world, I’m pretty damned secure. Arrogantly so. In fact, among intellectual classes, we intuit it a ‘beneath us’ to play social (political) dominance games. Just like the global wealthy consider fist-fighting beneath them. We consider it clownish. I can’t even imagine a world where ‘the enemy’ is considered anything other than an incompetent ungrateful jealous peasantry foaming at the mouth and chanting nonsense as a substitute for rational adult thought.
    Yet, I see now that it’s a dominance signal to the common man on the right. And so I think you put the problem into (intellectual) terms I can understand, and gave me a solution I can understand: A political movement for laboring, working, and middle-class males (who rely on dominance themselves) must express social dominance they can feel – before they can understand the words and policies being spoken, or support a political movement in their interests whether they understand those policies or not.
    As for Optics: Controlling optics is easy – if you understand that optics are as important to the common folk as they are insulting to the intellectual folk. So yes now I understand.
    As for Events: Events cost nothing. Even great events. Forming PAC and Parties is expensive. Raising money is expensive. Funding advertising campaigns is expensive. But ground games are what they are. And it’s one thing to take a ‘gib me stuf’ campaign, and another to ask men to grasp a political and economic system – and show up to fight for it.
    As for Sensibilities: Correct, I am an anglo classical libertarian. My goals are “let 1000 nations bloom” including WN. It’s just cheaper and happier for all of us that way. And me, I want to live among my own too. But I know that WN will eventually prevail simply because of the natural properties of European civ and European people. And that once WN’s exist under restoration of our law and government, and with defenses against the enemy’s strategy and tactics, that ‘our own’ will ‘flee’ to the WN societies. And those that do not – we do not want them. As for timing: Unless someone else takes up this strategy of providing a devolutionary solution the only possible solution to sovereignty for our people is to put American civilization – and the world by proxy – into a worse state than Europe after the world wars by a repetition of the European civil wars (ww1/2).
    As for Positioning: Our strategy has been to ‘Be the adults in the room. Speak the uncomfortable truth to all parties. Solve the problem of our age for everyone. For Americans. For European civilization. For the world. Take the moral high ground. And then show up in sufficient numbers to control the public narrative. Turn the narrative to the policies. And by our mere presence force its adoption or the population to consider the alternative. Faced with that choice the public will demand policies that are overwhelmingly beneficial to all of them regardless of political affiliation – at the expense of the national and global elites that seek the managed decline of the west, and the incremental destruction of the European peoples, in the pursuit of destroying the west as they have destroyed every other great civilization they touch with the cancer of their false promises and lies.
    As for The Right: You can’t have a world that perfectly suits your faction. So don’t undermine the collective. Reign in your own purity spiraling and disgust response for people on your side. Libertarians, Propertarians, Civic Nationalists, White Nationalists, National Socialists.  We must unite behind what unites us. Don’t impose costs on each other. Cooperation or peaceful separation. And yes, suppress the (“social retards”) raiders.  They are just children (women) testing the boundaries of their parents (sh-t testing). Keep on fighting the good fight.
    And don’t punch our own.

  • Lessons Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western Renaissance

    REGARDING: #Pantsgate – Propertarian July 4th Declaration Analysis

    http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbHKU-FllNo

    Great Leadership. Great insight. Lessons Understood. Thank you.

    As for the Problem with Intellectuals: It’s true. This has been an intellectual movement. I am an intellectual and Entrepreneur. I’ve only shifted to the political because it seems no one else will take a political stand, provide a solution other than outrage, or organize a revolutionary body to demand that solution – which is the only means of avoiding bloodshed and destruction (or outright losing).
    I think you’ve identified the problem. And yes, you’ve shown I did in fact have a blind spot.  Because I don’t even SENSE social dominance. Because in my universe only intellectual dominance exists. And in that world, I’m pretty damned secure. Arrogantly so. In fact, among intellectual classes, we intuit it a ‘beneath us’ to play social (political) dominance games. Just like the global wealthy consider fist-fighting beneath them. We consider it clownish. I can’t even imagine a world where ‘the enemy’ is considered anything other than an incompetent ungrateful jealous peasantry foaming at the mouth and chanting nonsense as a substitute for rational adult thought.
    Yet, I see now that it’s a dominance signal to the common man on the right. And so I think you put the problem into (intellectual) terms I can understand, and gave me a solution I can understand: A political movement for laboring, working, and middle-class males (who rely on dominance themselves) must express social dominance they can feel – before they can understand the words and policies being spoken, or support a political movement in their interests whether they understand those policies or not.
    As for Optics: Controlling optics is easy – if you understand that optics are as important to the common folk as they are insulting to the intellectual folk. So yes now I understand.
    As for Events: Events cost nothing. Even great events. Forming PAC and Parties is expensive. Raising money is expensive. Funding advertising campaigns is expensive. But ground games are what they are. And it’s one thing to take a ‘gib me stuf’ campaign, and another to ask men to grasp a political and economic system – and show up to fight for it.
    As for Sensibilities: Correct, I am an anglo classical libertarian. My goals are “let 1000 nations bloom” including WN. It’s just cheaper and happier for all of us that way. And me, I want to live among my own too. But I know that WN will eventually prevail simply because of the natural properties of European civ and European people. And that once WN’s exist under restoration of our law and government, and with defenses against the enemy’s strategy and tactics, that ‘our own’ will ‘flee’ to the WN societies. And those that do not – we do not want them. As for timing: Unless someone else takes up this strategy of providing a devolutionary solution the only possible solution to sovereignty for our people is to put American civilization – and the world by proxy – into a worse state than Europe after the world wars by a repetition of the European civil wars (ww1/2).
    As for Positioning: Our strategy has been to ‘Be the adults in the room. Speak the uncomfortable truth to all parties. Solve the problem of our age for everyone. For Americans. For European civilization. For the world. Take the moral high ground. And then show up in sufficient numbers to control the public narrative. Turn the narrative to the policies. And by our mere presence force its adoption or the population to consider the alternative. Faced with that choice the public will demand policies that are overwhelmingly beneficial to all of them regardless of political affiliation – at the expense of the national and global elites that seek the managed decline of the west, and the incremental destruction of the European peoples, in the pursuit of destroying the west as they have destroyed every other great civilization they touch with the cancer of their false promises and lies.
    As for The Right: You can’t have a world that perfectly suits your faction. So don’t undermine the collective. Reign in your own purity spiraling and disgust response for people on your side. Libertarians, Propertarians, Civic Nationalists, White Nationalists, National Socialists.  We must unite behind what unites us. Don’t impose costs on each other. Cooperation or peaceful separation. And yes, suppress the (“social retards”) raiders.  They are just children (women) testing the boundaries of their parents (sh-t testing). Keep on fighting the good fight.
    And don’t punch our own.

  • No. Everyone has them as long as they can afford them. If you can’t afford them

    No. Everyone has them as long as they can afford them. If you can’t afford them then you’re making others pay and increasing your costs to others. That’s the difference between parasitism (something you can control) and insurance (something you can’t control).

    Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @mpigliucci @aptest_eve

  • The market determines the underclass today as it always has. Your ability to liv

    The market determines the underclass today as it always has. Your ability to live among, socialize with, cooperate with, and earn a living with advanced people’s civ, is evidence. About 3-4% of the white population is unfit at any given time. About half of some others are unfit.

    Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @mpigliucci @aptest_eve

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Coronakrise5 @mpigliucci @aptest_eve Soft Eugenics (limit re

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Coronakrise5 @mpigliucci @aptest_eve Soft Eugenics (limit reproduction of the underclasses) vs Hard Eugenics (action ag…

  • Soft Eugenics (limit reproduction of the underclasses) vs Hard Eugenics (action

    Soft Eugenics (limit reproduction of the underclasses) vs Hard Eugenics (action against those unfit who are born.)

    The reason for east and west’s success is more attributable to eugenics than any other factor.

    Manorialism all but eliminated the european underclasses.

    Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @mpigliucci @aptest_eve

  • There is no falsification of eugenics. Please find a set of papers that says so.

    There is no falsification of eugenics. Please find a set of papers that says so. Eugenics = Domestication of plants, animals, and man. The eugenics movement was successful. All anti-eugenic speech is postwar anti-national-socialism: ‘we don’t like it’. It’s certainly true.

    Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @mpigliucci

  • a) The problem of premises. What good is reason for the three false promises of

    a) The problem of premises. What good is reason for the three false promises of the left: nature of man(amorality), the malleability of man(blank slate), and endless growth (scarcity) b) the problem of seeking justification vs falsification c) The necessity of Market Eugenics.

    Reply addressees: @EPoe187