We need: The Aristotle/Law (Truth) to know it; The Epic cycle/Paganism/Tragedy (Strong) to fight for it, The Arthurian/chivalry(Middle) to govern under it; and Christianity(Meek) to suffer it. The meek are left out of the European pagan pantheon – they are the slaves – those to be conquered, domesticated like animals, and used like animals, to advance the aristocracy that advances the laws of nature and nature’s god. Christianity provides the meek with honor and status and virtue.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Cheapest of Slaves
A slave of irons is cheaper than the work of one’s hands. A slave of land(serf) is cheaper than a slave of irons. A slave of tax is cheaper than a slave of land. A slave of credit is cheaper than a slave of tax A slave of faith is the cheapest of all. He pays interest on his credit He pays taxes in his production He pays for his land He pays for himself. He costs nothing but false promises; But to bait him into slavery with false promises he must seek relief from an oppressor, and returns he can never quite grasp: Freedom from scarcity, freedom from inequality, freedom from a nature all but hostile to his existence. Europeans.
-
The Cheapest of Slaves
A slave of irons is cheaper than the work of one’s hands. A slave of land(serf) is cheaper than a slave of irons. A slave of tax is cheaper than a slave of land. A slave of credit is cheaper than a slave of tax A slave of faith is the cheapest of all. He pays interest on his credit He pays taxes in his production He pays for his land He pays for himself. He costs nothing but false promises; But to bait him into slavery with false promises he must seek relief from an oppressor, and returns he can never quite grasp: Freedom from scarcity, freedom from inequality, freedom from a nature all but hostile to his existence. Europeans.
-
Christianity in Europe Was a Religion Of, For, and By the Elite.
CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE. (Christianity = Marxism-Postmodernism) “All roads lead to Rome. Christianity in Europe was a religion of, for, and by the elite. For example Catholic Mass was given in Latin until 1963. Did peasants speak, read or understand Latin? Not 12th century french peasants that is for damn sure. The elite nature of the church goes back to the original legitimacy of kings. When the Roman Empire collapsed there was a huge power vacuum in the conquered territories. The very small and very young Catholic Church held onto its dominance in Europe by holding onto the power of the ancient Pontiff Maximus. Kindling the ancient legitimacy and glory of Rome the Pope was the origin of authority in Christendom. Here we have to interject a distinction between the Eastern and western Roman empires. In the Orthodox and Eastern Church the High Priest did not trump the authority of the Kings/Emperors. But, in the West the Pontiff (Pope) did trump the authority of kings. This traditional distinction between the two could go back to Caesar being Pontiff Maximus before being Emperor. And later Constantine being King who appointed priests. Remember when Napoleon crowned himself Emperor? This was to signify that he stands over the authority of the pope. First off what we know today as France was not completely unified during the Middle Ages. It was actually a diverse place with a Normans, Franks, Goths, Anglo-Germanic peoples, and who could forget the Swiss. If we start with the two hundred years between Charlemagne and the Norman invasion of Great Britain (East Anglia) in 1066 as a measure we can be assured that peasants in Europe were still very pagan. Charlemagne (crowned by the Pope) spread the authority of the Holy Roman Empire with a sword. Charlemagne is basically the ultimate Christian warrior king for Christ. If you do some digging you will find much of his kingship was spent on horseback spreading the word by spilling blood. He traveled collected taxes and asserted his and the Churches legitimate authority. In Early Christian France alone there is a very very diverse group of peoples living together. So basically the average peasant would only know what they are told by the Church i.e. the divine nature of the king, the dominance of the Christ, the meaning of the divine birth, and the meaning of Christ’s death. What is interesting is the degree of which the early church in Europe actually adapted the rituals and practices of the people in Europe. For exapmle we even today still celebrate, May first (Beltaine), Christmas (Saturnalia), Easter(Roman New Year), and Holloween (Samhaine). Have you ever played around a May Pole? Have you ever kissed under Holly? What about drinking at the modern New Year? All of these holidays (Holy Days) were originally pagan holy days. Is it not interesting how we still celebrate them? Did you know the puritan colony of Massachusetts had laws prohibiting all of the aforementioned Holy Days on the grounds that they were in fact Pagan! So basically the early church appealed to the native religions of Europe by adapting their practices. Because remember, Europeans were the first conquest of the cross they had to be slowly integrated because there were far to many pagans to kill. So in a TLDR answer to your question a peasant in early christian France would most likely still know about the ancient religion of their forefathers. They would be practicing Christians but the practices of villages across France would be markedly different. If you ever visit France you will notice village saints or church relics across the country. The peasants would know relatively know nothing outside of their small worlds. Being illiterate and with feudal system laws in place tying people to the land there was little opportunity for people to learn much about the world out side of what the local authority figures said. Those saints were once either pagan gods or heroes now forgotten and adapted by the Church. Those relics therein were once pagan relics. This was the only way the early church was able to survive in the Pagan stronghold of Europe. Through a conquest of integration built off of the once Omnipotent authority of the Roman Empire. Remember Beowulf was written down in the 11th century the line between pagan and christian was still fairly thin well into the renascence. There are some, like Colin, who have even theorized that the Druids, and Pagan Kings went underground joining the church in an attempt to keep their ancient traditions alive.” Edit: sources: Viola, Frank and Greg Barna: Pagan Chritianity (2008) González, Justo L. (1984). The Story of Christianity: Vol. 1: The Early Church to the Reformation. San Francisco: Harper. Grabar, André (1968). Christian iconography, a study of its origins. Princeton University Press. Morris, Colin (1989). The papal monarchy : the western church from 1050 to 1250. Oxford: Clarendon.
-
Christianity in Europe Was a Religion Of, For, and By the Elite.
CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WAS A RELIGION OF, FOR, AND BY THE ELITE. (Christianity = Marxism-Postmodernism) “All roads lead to Rome. Christianity in Europe was a religion of, for, and by the elite. For example Catholic Mass was given in Latin until 1963. Did peasants speak, read or understand Latin? Not 12th century french peasants that is for damn sure. The elite nature of the church goes back to the original legitimacy of kings. When the Roman Empire collapsed there was a huge power vacuum in the conquered territories. The very small and very young Catholic Church held onto its dominance in Europe by holding onto the power of the ancient Pontiff Maximus. Kindling the ancient legitimacy and glory of Rome the Pope was the origin of authority in Christendom. Here we have to interject a distinction between the Eastern and western Roman empires. In the Orthodox and Eastern Church the High Priest did not trump the authority of the Kings/Emperors. But, in the West the Pontiff (Pope) did trump the authority of kings. This traditional distinction between the two could go back to Caesar being Pontiff Maximus before being Emperor. And later Constantine being King who appointed priests. Remember when Napoleon crowned himself Emperor? This was to signify that he stands over the authority of the pope. First off what we know today as France was not completely unified during the Middle Ages. It was actually a diverse place with a Normans, Franks, Goths, Anglo-Germanic peoples, and who could forget the Swiss. If we start with the two hundred years between Charlemagne and the Norman invasion of Great Britain (East Anglia) in 1066 as a measure we can be assured that peasants in Europe were still very pagan. Charlemagne (crowned by the Pope) spread the authority of the Holy Roman Empire with a sword. Charlemagne is basically the ultimate Christian warrior king for Christ. If you do some digging you will find much of his kingship was spent on horseback spreading the word by spilling blood. He traveled collected taxes and asserted his and the Churches legitimate authority. In Early Christian France alone there is a very very diverse group of peoples living together. So basically the average peasant would only know what they are told by the Church i.e. the divine nature of the king, the dominance of the Christ, the meaning of the divine birth, and the meaning of Christ’s death. What is interesting is the degree of which the early church in Europe actually adapted the rituals and practices of the people in Europe. For exapmle we even today still celebrate, May first (Beltaine), Christmas (Saturnalia), Easter(Roman New Year), and Holloween (Samhaine). Have you ever played around a May Pole? Have you ever kissed under Holly? What about drinking at the modern New Year? All of these holidays (Holy Days) were originally pagan holy days. Is it not interesting how we still celebrate them? Did you know the puritan colony of Massachusetts had laws prohibiting all of the aforementioned Holy Days on the grounds that they were in fact Pagan! So basically the early church appealed to the native religions of Europe by adapting their practices. Because remember, Europeans were the first conquest of the cross they had to be slowly integrated because there were far to many pagans to kill. So in a TLDR answer to your question a peasant in early christian France would most likely still know about the ancient religion of their forefathers. They would be practicing Christians but the practices of villages across France would be markedly different. If you ever visit France you will notice village saints or church relics across the country. The peasants would know relatively know nothing outside of their small worlds. Being illiterate and with feudal system laws in place tying people to the land there was little opportunity for people to learn much about the world out side of what the local authority figures said. Those saints were once either pagan gods or heroes now forgotten and adapted by the Church. Those relics therein were once pagan relics. This was the only way the early church was able to survive in the Pagan stronghold of Europe. Through a conquest of integration built off of the once Omnipotent authority of the Roman Empire. Remember Beowulf was written down in the 11th century the line between pagan and christian was still fairly thin well into the renascence. There are some, like Colin, who have even theorized that the Druids, and Pagan Kings went underground joining the church in an attempt to keep their ancient traditions alive.” Edit: sources: Viola, Frank and Greg Barna: Pagan Chritianity (2008) González, Justo L. (1984). The Story of Christianity: Vol. 1: The Early Church to the Reformation. San Francisco: Harper. Grabar, André (1968). Christian iconography, a study of its origins. Princeton University Press. Morris, Colin (1989). The papal monarchy : the western church from 1050 to 1250. Oxford: Clarendon.
-
The Mistake Was Combining It with The Militia.
Notice the use of Right, Obligation, and Alienation. Notice the use of Display Word and Deed. Alienation means you can neither surrender it or have it taken.
The right and obligation of all citizens to keep and bear any and all arms individually preferred, functionally required, or strategically necessary for personal, familial, civil, commons, and military defense, without exception, shall not be infringed.
the obligation of all able-bodied males to remain fit for and to perform service in a citizen’s militia shall not be infringed.
the inalienability of the right to keep arms, bear arms, and obligation to remain fit for, perform service in, the citizen’s militia shall not be infringed.
Any and all attempts by display word or deed to alienate citizen or citizens from the right and obligation to keep and bear those arms, remain fit for and perform services in the citizen’s militia, shall constitute an act of treason punishable by death.
-
The Mistake Was Combining It with The Militia.
Notice the use of Right, Obligation, and Alienation. Notice the use of Display Word and Deed. Alienation means you can neither surrender it or have it taken.
The right and obligation of all citizens to keep and bear any and all arms individually preferred, functionally required, or strategically necessary for personal, familial, civil, commons, and military defense, without exception, shall not be infringed.
the obligation of all able-bodied males to remain fit for and to perform service in a citizen’s militia shall not be infringed.
the inalienability of the right to keep arms, bear arms, and obligation to remain fit for, perform service in, the citizen’s militia shall not be infringed.
Any and all attempts by display word or deed to alienate citizen or citizens from the right and obligation to keep and bear those arms, remain fit for and perform services in the citizen’s militia, shall constitute an act of treason punishable by death.
-
No the Cancer of The Left Hasn”t Gone Too Far – until The Election. the Strategy Will Work
—“If the social revolution is the global metastasis (of sense) already far gone, that is, already extended to and infiltrated regionally, is a regional compromise not impossible? And is a military strategy not doomed to failure, by sheer imbalance of robot numbers, both human and machine?”—Pierre Rousseau
No, the strategy will work because it’s ‘real’ not just verbal or moralizing but offers real material benefits to everyone at the expense of world elites. The problem is getting past the noise into discussion of those benefits. And because if the ‘threat’ of having 100k men moving about, consuming everything in their path, picking up more men as they go along, even if they do nothing martial, doesn’t work – then letting them loose on infrastructure will do the rest. Controlling the narrative forces the discussion on policy. Discussing the policy exposes the system of lying. Removing the myth of state power removes the will to resist. The worst that happens is separation. The gov’t cannot ‘fire on’ its own people when they are asking for financial reforms without world justification for ‘punishing the government’ from without. It will work flawlessly – If we get 100k people before the left takes office.
-
No the Cancer of The Left Hasn”t Gone Too Far – until The Election. the Strategy Will Work
—“If the social revolution is the global metastasis (of sense) already far gone, that is, already extended to and infiltrated regionally, is a regional compromise not impossible? And is a military strategy not doomed to failure, by sheer imbalance of robot numbers, both human and machine?”—Pierre Rousseau
No, the strategy will work because it’s ‘real’ not just verbal or moralizing but offers real material benefits to everyone at the expense of world elites. The problem is getting past the noise into discussion of those benefits. And because if the ‘threat’ of having 100k men moving about, consuming everything in their path, picking up more men as they go along, even if they do nothing martial, doesn’t work – then letting them loose on infrastructure will do the rest. Controlling the narrative forces the discussion on policy. Discussing the policy exposes the system of lying. Removing the myth of state power removes the will to resist. The worst that happens is separation. The gov’t cannot ‘fire on’ its own people when they are asking for financial reforms without world justification for ‘punishing the government’ from without. It will work flawlessly – If we get 100k people before the left takes office.
-
The Difference Between Christian Sects
Christianity: all Christian sects … Catholicism: Religion of Rule … Orthodoxy: Religion within Rule … Protestantism: Religion outside of rule.