2) So throughout our history, we have had the martial aristocracy, the legal nobility, and the church nobility, and the right cannot function without Martial to lead, Legal to administer, and Church to parent. The European people are entirely composed of followers – and neutered.
Source: Original Site Post
-
1) Because conservatism is a romantic and anti-intellectual disposition, we see
1) Because conservatism is a romantic and anti-intellectual disposition, we see the Continental Right produces romantic political literature, and the Anglo Right produces empirical political literature. The Romantic isn’t actionable, and the Empirical isn’t inspirational.
-
The Choice – Episode 12 – Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative
The Choice – Episode 12 – Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism https://t.co/vDdJAHxzoN
-
The Choice – Episode 12 – Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism
Script
“I’d be more popular but conservatism is an anti-intellectual disposition, so all conservative thought leaders are, like me, conservative libertarians – meaning ‘Rule of Law’ conservatives rather than ‘Rule by Man’ conservatives, or Rule by Priesthood conservatives.”
Trifunctionalism:
1. Conservative Libertarians – Intellectual Rule of Law
2. Martial Conservatives – Dominance Rule of Man
3. Priestly Conservatives – Empathic Rule by Priesthood
—
4. And the pragmatic body politic.As I’ve said the problem of our age requries a meal of intellectual solutions but the disenfranchised working laboring and lower middle classes want to be served comfort food they’re faliliar with – and that will continue to make them fail.
Why? Because they don’t understand that the priestly and military emotional responses are those of FOLLOWERS not leaders.
And ifyou want to RULE yourselves or others – you must LEAD. ANd to lead requires you can organize, govern, and rule. And you can only organize govern and rule the avanced civilization that is western civlization by law. Because law is the set of rule of behavior, whther personal, economic, civil, or political.
Religion and Martial bind us as followers.
The law binds us as leaders.
And we have none.It’s time for adulthood.
It’s time for realism, naturalism, and action (operationalism)
It’s time for law.
Military to defend that law.
Religion to transmit that law across generations. -
The Choice – Episode 12 – Popularity vs Necessity – The Problem of Conservative Anti-Intellectualism
Script
“I’d be more popular but conservatism is an anti-intellectual disposition, so all conservative thought leaders are, like me, conservative libertarians – meaning ‘Rule of Law’ conservatives rather than ‘Rule by Man’ conservatives, or Rule by Priesthood conservatives.”
Trifunctionalism:
1. Conservative Libertarians – Intellectual Rule of Law
2. Martial Conservatives – Dominance Rule of Man
3. Priestly Conservatives – Empathic Rule by Priesthood
—
4. And the pragmatic body politic.As I’ve said the problem of our age requries a meal of intellectual solutions but the disenfranchised working laboring and lower middle classes want to be served comfort food they’re faliliar with – and that will continue to make them fail.
Why? Because they don’t understand that the priestly and military emotional responses are those of FOLLOWERS not leaders.
And ifyou want to RULE yourselves or others – you must LEAD. ANd to lead requires you can organize, govern, and rule. And you can only organize govern and rule the avanced civilization that is western civlization by law. Because law is the set of rule of behavior, whther personal, economic, civil, or political.
Religion and Martial bind us as followers.
The law binds us as leaders.
And we have none.It’s time for adulthood.
It’s time for realism, naturalism, and action (operationalism)
It’s time for law.
Military to defend that law.
Religion to transmit that law across generations. -
(Yes, You figured it out. Thank you. The xians are always lying by indirection.)
(Yes, You figured it out. Thank you. The xians are always lying by indirection.)
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @realgalaxyjesus @JohnnyR84030075 @ramzpaul -
It’s possible we killed john mark’s populist version of P. If he had been willin
It’s possible we killed john mark’s populist version of P. If he had been willing and able to give the launch speech maybe it would be different. But I had to do it. He wasn’t willing to go public.
But the intellectual and political (not populist) work will last forever.
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @realgalaxyjesus @JohnnyR84030075 @ramzpaul -
( Some people came hoping for a boogaloo. Except, the whole point is not to have
( Some people came hoping for a boogaloo. Except, the whole point is not to have one, and if we did, to roll right from demonstration into it.
Let’s see how our fall pitch to ‘the good people’ goes. )
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @realgalaxyjesus @JohnnyR84030075 @ramzpaul -
But you know, so far, everyone else’s ideas are no-shows. Winning is easy. But w
But you know, so far, everyone else’s ideas are no-shows.
Winning is easy. But without Gandhi strategy to disempower the left, and without numbers, and without turning the people against the right, they will fail over and over and over again.
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @realgalaxyjesus @JohnnyR84030075 @ramzpaul -
Nationalist There were a few xian or ns wackos at the event and at the campsite.
Nationalist There were a few xian or ns wackos at the event and at the campsite. T’was fun. Later, I couldn’t believe the folks were stupid enough to fall for the BLM tricks, and not understand what I was doing, But now I’m not surprised. And I’m still waiting for anyone’s plan.
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @realgalaxyjesus @JohnnyR84030075 @ramzpaul