correct. ergo ‘we need a bible, or book of law that is ‘sacred’ as was our constitution but less vulnerable.
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Source: Original Site Post
-
correct. ergo ‘we need a bible, or book of law that is ‘sacred’ as was our const
-
5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french
5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french revolution and Chinese, perform a thorough purge, (d) update the constitution and therefore common knowledge, so that (e) it doesn’t happen again.
(I just wanted to do it systematically. lol)
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus -
4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) th
4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus -
3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against
3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against it. The monarchies did. The pre-war countries did. Other countries protect against it. And they use our ‘openness’ exploit this vulnerability in our civilization. …
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus -
2) … outside the constitutional framework, because that framework was constrai
2) … outside the constitutional framework, because that framework was constrained by guarantees (a) freedom of speech even if fraudulent and harmful, (b) freedom of religion, even if pseudoscientific and harmful, (c) and treason, sedition, and defamation, undermined postwar.
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus -
Great question. A thorough answer would be time-consuming. Short answer, which w
Great question. A thorough answer would be time-consuming. Short answer, which won’t quite help, is that:
1) the ((())) left’s reformation of supernatural Abrahamism into a pseudoscientific religion, and repetition of the destruction of Rome (Germany, Russia) from within, is ..
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus -
interesting not on psychopathy: the scope and definition of the term has narrowe
interesting not on psychopathy: the scope and definition of the term has narrowed over time. The term today would be anti-social behavior. But AFAIK these behaviors are all caused by group differences in neoteny (Pedomorphism) and class size, and reinforcement by ingroup norms.
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @Jyrkiboy_ @TruthQuest11 @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods -
SS: These people scare me. They not only have the right to life, the right to wa
SS: These people scare me. They not only have the right to life, the right to walk among us, the right of public speech, but they can actually vote?
They’re undomesticated animals. lol
Reply addressees: @SammySc44817825 @Jyrkiboy_ @TruthQuest11 @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods -
FYI: IQ is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain struc
FYI: IQ is a personality trait, and personality traits the result of brain structure, and brain structure the result of genetics: Ergo Big 5 + IQ = Big 6 + Sex (Amplitude of Sex Differences in Cognition) = Big 7. With Sex< Conscientiousness< IQ dominant.
https://t.co/Z7JBnF9seP -
(if someone like Martin Stepan has the good graces to invest his time in you, it
(if someone like Martin Stepan has the good graces to invest his time in you, it would be worth your time to consider his words. You will find very few people capable of his depth of understanding.)
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @Jyrkiboy_ @TruthQuest11 @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods