There Is No Cavalry Coming https://t.co/VsYbMrMuiz
Source: Original Site Post
-
There Is No Cavalry Coming
THERE IS NO CAVALRY COMING
Yet another stalker who threatened to come “teach me a lesson” (visit violence upon me), was a no-show today. My understanding is that Facebook policy prohibits identifying these lunatics, or I’d share the photos and information. So far, one individual came from new jersey without saying would in advance, and created a little video of his escapade. And every other tough-talking man hasn’t shown. Like I said. Men show up. Pretend-men talk. And not-men talk sh-t about better men. The loser-right uses the internet as a video game – not purposefully, but because they’re insufficiently able to disambiguate fantasy from reality.
Funny how many people came after me for saying (a) we’re going to have a civil war (b) we’re going to have an economic collapse ( c) they’re going to roughly coincide. (d) the state is not able to suppress insurrection on a national level without losing it’s legitimacy home and abroad. (e) the country’s infrastructure is the strategic vulnerability. (f) that the currency system is even more vulnerable than the grid (but I seem to be the only one that sees that weakness).
The state has again, this spring, issued a report that the primary vulnerability is the grid, and that they aren’t able to secure it. That the military has no (magic) weaponry. That we still cannot handle even the most trivial of emergencies. That it’s not ‘powerful’ except in combined arms against other combined arms armies. That we can’t even supply our own military or medical any longer because the supply chain is lost. but it’s worse than that: there is no ability to militarily mobilize the people (outside of the south). (I published a The Choice episode on WHY demilitarization (feminization) of the polity has these strategic impacts on rapid response to threats. And that analysis was correct.)
So, while the opportunity is there. I can’t see the left losing. Because they’re willing to fight. The right isn’t even willing to show up.
And the stalkers are a symptom of a greater nonsense – the ‘middle-easterning’ of men’s words, and men.
Before he was ‘disappeared’ I talked to a very frustrated Augustus who felt resigned that the right was, like little women, waiting for the men to save them. And they are waiting for each other in the greatest circle-j–k in human history.
There is no cavalry. They were the aristocracy. And in our democratic vanity – in selling our virtues of egalitarianism, we ended them without understanding that those few people – those few hundred thousand people were what made our civilization possible.
And while the rifle disempowered them as warriors, it did not disempower their tradition – until this century when we let the barbarians achieve what weapons could not.
-
There Is No Cavalry Coming
THERE IS NO CAVALRY COMING
Yet another stalker who threatened to come “teach me a lesson” (visit violence upon me), was a no-show today. My understanding is that Facebook policy prohibits identifying these lunatics, or I’d share the photos and information. So far, one individual came from new jersey without saying would in advance, and created a little video of his escapade. And every other tough-talking man hasn’t shown. Like I said. Men show up. Pretend-men talk. And not-men talk sh-t about better men. The loser-right uses the internet as a video game – not purposefully, but because they’re insufficiently able to disambiguate fantasy from reality.
Funny how many people came after me for saying (a) we’re going to have a civil war (b) we’re going to have an economic collapse ( c) they’re going to roughly coincide. (d) the state is not able to suppress insurrection on a national level without losing it’s legitimacy home and abroad. (e) the country’s infrastructure is the strategic vulnerability. (f) that the currency system is even more vulnerable than the grid (but I seem to be the only one that sees that weakness).
The state has again, this spring, issued a report that the primary vulnerability is the grid, and that they aren’t able to secure it. That the military has no (magic) weaponry. That we still cannot handle even the most trivial of emergencies. That it’s not ‘powerful’ except in combined arms against other combined arms armies. That we can’t even supply our own military or medical any longer because the supply chain is lost. but it’s worse than that: there is no ability to militarily mobilize the people (outside of the south). (I published a The Choice episode on WHY demilitarization (feminization) of the polity has these strategic impacts on rapid response to threats. And that analysis was correct.)
So, while the opportunity is there. I can’t see the left losing. Because they’re willing to fight. The right isn’t even willing to show up.
And the stalkers are a symptom of a greater nonsense – the ‘middle-easterning’ of men’s words, and men.
Before he was ‘disappeared’ I talked to a very frustrated Augustus who felt resigned that the right was, like little women, waiting for the men to save them. And they are waiting for each other in the greatest circle-j–k in human history.
There is no cavalry. They were the aristocracy. And in our democratic vanity – in selling our virtues of egalitarianism, we ended them without understanding that those few people – those few hundred thousand people were what made our civilization possible.
And while the rifle disempowered them as warriors, it did not disempower their tradition – until this century when we let the barbarians achieve what weapons could not.
-
The Barriers to Right Activism
The Barriers to Right Activism https://t.co/qCwOLB2WAm
-
The Barriers to Right Activism
—“Identify the barriers and lift them. The problem is obvious but why is it like this? We need data on what these barriers are for the right. Is it the fact that they have to much to lose? Comfort? Security? Or cowardness?”—Bjorn Hocke
The barriers to right activism are:
1 – Boyhood: No intention to do anything, just find shallow dominance expression from the safety and anonymity of being online (these are undesirables);
2 – Cowardice: (lots of Xian’s in this category);
3 – Right Psychology (a) lower agreeableness (b) tendency to over-rely on self-judgment, (c) tendency to demand self-determination, need for control, need for understanding, need for certainty, need for leaders they understand. This leads to atomization and the near panic of ‘just show up and we’ll figure it out. The left ‘just shows up and figures it out. Because they are not concerned with status or hierarchy.
3 – Relative Poverty such that they can’t show up because they’re already disenfranchised; living on marginal income so that they can’t afford the time off or away;
4 – Responsibilities so that they can’t afford being away without serious consequences;
5 – Consequence of doxxing by GSRRM that would hurt them their income or their families;
6 – Wives or girlfriends that would leave them if they did;
7 – and property that they have accumulated that they are unable or willing to expose to risk.The left is not burdend by these constraints. Why? The right manages vast commons and the left consumes them. This is the difference in our ‘wiring’. Male capitalization (pack territory and resources), female consumption (herd and offspring consumption before others beat them to it.)
This is why only a mass movement will work and ‘resistance’ won’t. It’s because without certain reprisals for the left’s DOXX machine, the right afford to show up.
Hence my strategy. Hence why everyone else’s is a lost cause. -
The Barriers to Right Activism
—“Identify the barriers and lift them. The problem is obvious but why is it like this? We need data on what these barriers are for the right. Is it the fact that they have to much to lose? Comfort? Security? Or cowardness?”—Bjorn Hocke
The barriers to right activism are:
1 – Boyhood: No intention to do anything, just find shallow dominance expression from the safety and anonymity of being online (these are undesirables);
2 – Cowardice: (lots of Xian’s in this category);
3 – Right Psychology (a) lower agreeableness (b) tendency to over-rely on self-judgment, (c) tendency to demand self-determination, need for control, need for understanding, need for certainty, need for leaders they understand. This leads to atomization and the near panic of ‘just show up and we’ll figure it out. The left ‘just shows up and figures it out. Because they are not concerned with status or hierarchy.
3 – Relative Poverty such that they can’t show up because they’re already disenfranchised; living on marginal income so that they can’t afford the time off or away;
4 – Responsibilities so that they can’t afford being away without serious consequences;
5 – Consequence of doxxing by GSRRM that would hurt them their income or their families;
6 – Wives or girlfriends that would leave them if they did;
7 – and property that they have accumulated that they are unable or willing to expose to risk.The left is not burdend by these constraints. Why? The right manages vast commons and the left consumes them. This is the difference in our ‘wiring’. Male capitalization (pack territory and resources), female consumption (herd and offspring consumption before others beat them to it.)
This is why only a mass movement will work and ‘resistance’ won’t. It’s because without certain reprisals for the left’s DOXX machine, the right afford to show up.
Hence my strategy. Hence why everyone else’s is a lost cause. -
Path Dependence
Path Dependence https://t.co/aKw4kEaroE
-
Path Dependence
—“I’ve just realized “path dependence” is a term also applicable to the kind of civilization that evolves based on the order of development of law, state and religion.”—Martin Stépan -
Path Dependence
—“I’ve just realized “path dependence” is a term also applicable to the kind of civilization that evolves based on the order of development of law, state and religion.”—Martin Stépan -
How We Ended up Here: Mindfulness as Algorithmic Computation
How We Ended up Here: Mindfulness as Algorithmic Computation https://t.co/mCRlBjaNjY