7. As such, the conversion of Jesus’ teaching – the Europeanization of it to rational philosophy, legal and economic science – is a useful contribution to european natural law of reciprocity.
Source: Original Site Post
-
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the
6. My criticism of Christianity is that the means of indoctrination into (a) the empathic imitation of Jesus treatment of others, or (b) the rational adoption of the scientific statement of those ethics, (c) relies upon and teaches the Abrahamic method of deceit (and ignorance).
-
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with
5. As such a scientific statement of the Christian ethic is both compatible with natural law and the only known via-positiva enhancement of it. (And the optimum advice (philosophy) for the weak, the dim, and the meek is to follow that strategy because they will do least harm.)
-
4. This optimum strategy is not evident in the test of reciprocity which is a vi
4. This optimum strategy is not evident in the test of reciprocity which is a via-negativa science of what not to do. It is counter-intuitive, and non-obvious (and therefore unique) to EMPIRICALLY exhaust forgiveness of another INDIVIDUAL before determining that effort futile.
-
3. This strategy is the optimum solution to the prisoners’ dilemma, and the opti
3. This strategy is the optimum solution to the prisoners’ dilemma, and the optimum strategy for maximizing cooperation – and it is completely contrary to natural human instinct to favor family, clan, kin.
-
2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship lo
2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship love to kindred, (c)The demand for personal acts of charity to do so. (d)The exhaustion of forgiveness in pursuit of cooperation, before boycott, ostracization, punishment, or war.
-
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfu
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfully ignorant, or addictively deceptive (in denialism).
1. Christian ethics can be stated scientifically and I have done so. … https://t.co/Zj0xxTsuff -
If it isn’t calculable and there is no feedback loop then it’s just disinformati
If it isn’t calculable and there is no feedback loop then it’s just disinformation (lying);
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
The usual argument is communism at home, socialism with extended family, liberal
The usual argument is communism at home, socialism with extended family, liberalism locally, and rule of law (ethical capitalism) at scale.
Why? you can’t have the knowledge to do anything else.
And you create malincentives if you try.
So liberalism is just misapplication.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear
Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear the cost of that payment it’s a good system of ethics – exhaustion of forgiveness will work. It does not scale AT ALL because the info is no longer available to us. ERGO leftism = disinformation.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4