Sorry man. evidence is. 😉
All great innovations in theory are the work of individuals.
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul
Source: Original Site Post
-
Sorry man. evidence is. 😉 All great innovations in theory are the work of indiv
-
(I built one of the largest privately-held tech consultancies in America, and tw
(I built one of the largest privately-held tech consultancies in America, and two others, and retired in my forties, and since then produced the completion of the scientific method and the formal logic of law. Do not overestimate your abilities until you exhaust all fields.)
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
If you don’t know natural law, behavioral economics, and cognitive science, you
If you don’t know natural law, behavioral economics, and cognitive science, you are functionally illiterate. And it’s extremly unlikely that you are one-tenth of the engineer I am, or one tent of percent of the theorist of the scientific method (production of testimony.)
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
THE PROPER QUADRIVIUM, NOT TRIVIUM If you grasp this you see why the trivium fai
THE PROPER QUADRIVIUM, NOT TRIVIUM
If you grasp this you see why the trivium failed.
1-Grammar, 2-Logic, 3-Testimony, 4-Rhetoric
If you don’t know Natural Law( P-Law), Behavioral Economics, and Cognitive Science (the mechanics of the brain) you are functionally illiterate today. https://t.co/oDTJekDInK -
I think you’re confused but that’s ok. This is another example of why common fol
I think you’re confused but that’s ok. This is another example of why common folk really should be trained in grammar, logic, testimony, and rhetoric (the proper quadrivium) so that they are aware of when they are too ignorant to issue opinions (questions, theories, assertions).
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
Classification of an opinion piece by a journalistic source means only that the
Classification of an opinion piece by a journalistic source means only that the editorial board does not warranty the due diligence for consistency, correspondence, possiblity, and incentives of the piece. It has nothing to do with the content of the piece.
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
You are both ignorant and naive. What’s the difference between a reaction, an op
You are both ignorant and naive. What’s the difference between a reaction, an opinion,a hypothesis, a theory, and a law? The only thing that separates them is the degree of due diligence (falsification) they survive. You are over your head, but you are a useful example to others.
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
At present, as far as I know, I’m the leading theorist of the foundations of wes
At present, as far as I know, I’m the leading theorist of the foundations of western civilization by the singular production of contractualism (law) as first institution rather than that of religion or state. (The three possible means of organization).
You just don’t know that.
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
You just don’t know you’re lying, or whether you are lying by internality or ext
You just don’t know you’re lying, or whether you are lying by internality or externality, you are merely lying because you failed to perform due diligence against lying.
Making an assertion by asking a question is still making an assertion using suggestion as deception.
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
RT @curtdoolittle: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul Failure of due diligence is the primary p
RT @curtdoolittle: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul Failure of due diligence is the primary purpose of tort law, and tort law is the foundation of all o…