I do everything in public like you do, and I pay the price. The difference is that I can afford to.
Reply addressees: @Cernovich
Source: Original Site Post
-
I do everything in public like you do, and I pay the price. The difference is th
-
The threat is interesting because it serves to disintermediate the individual pl
The threat is interesting because it serves to disintermediate the individual pledging and the community who will punish that individual, from personal responsibility, and as such, prevent retaliation cycles.
Everything in human history is logical when explained in p-law.
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche -
Christianity consists of (a) a threat, (b) a pledge to do no harm, (c) a pledge
Christianity consists of (a) a threat, (b) a pledge to do no harm, (c) a pledge to exhaust forgiveness, (d) a pledge to exhaust charity.
A pledge to survive by via-negativa merit.
Swearing on the bible confirms those pledges.
This understanding is metaphysical.
I ‘science’ it.
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche -
Only via positivas are useful to the masses. We can know the via-negativas (harm
Only via positivas are useful to the masses. We can know the via-negativas (harms, thefts, costs). But we cannot know the range of via positivas – only the market can determine them. If we institutionalize the via-negativas, people will develop and market via-positivas (virtues).
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche -
Very, very, smart question. Instead, is there a means by which to construct a la
Very, very, smart question.
Instead, is there a means by which to construct a law such that we produce a market for the suppression of falsehood, deceit, and fraud, that provides sufficient incentive to avoid greed and demonstrate the pretense of integrity?
Law, not belief. https://t.co/POjxfUBAJW -
Very, very, smart question. Instead, is there a means by which to construct a la
Very, very, smart question.
Instead, is there a means by which to construct a law such that we produce a market for the suppression of falsehood, deceit, and fraud, that provides sufficient incentive to avoid greed and demonstrate the pretense of integrity?
Law not belief.
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche -
You do realize how desperate your attempts at face-saving are, and how useless t
You do realize how desperate your attempts at face-saving are, and how useless they are, don’t you? Go cool down somewhere and try to refute the central argument rather than attempt to GSRRM and distract from it like a female, Marxist, or postmodernist. 😉
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
Understanding that consciousness is a byproduct rather than cause helps a great
Understanding that consciousness is a byproduct rather than cause helps a great deal. https://t.co/3jqPwN6kVv
-
You mean the individuals like Aristotle, Machiavelli, Newton, Smith, Hume, Darwi
You mean the individuals like Aristotle, Machiavelli, Newton, Smith, Hume, Darwin, Maxwell, Einstein, Watson and Crick?
Or do you mean like the group-thinkers like the Abrahamic faiths, the marxists, neo-marxists, postmodernists, HBD-science-denialists?
See the pattern? 😉
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
(Sorry. Another thought. I think an understanding of this phenomenon rapidly dis
(Sorry. Another thought. I think an understanding of this phenomenon rapidly dispenses with the illusion that our consciousness is in control, rather than a layer of recursion on top. For example, sleepwalkers can do many things but rarely interact. Consc. evolved for social. )
Reply addressees: @bierlingm