When Americans say “Unconstitutional” it’s not as in Europe where the citizens aren’t sovereign – the state is. The American Constitution imposes Natural Law (Scientific Law), under the Common Law (Market) demanding Reciprocity (Contractualism) where INDIVIDUALS are sovereign.
Source: Original Site Post
-
(((LIES))) WATCH: THE ACA —“If conservatives think it’s ridiculous to say cons
(((LIES))) WATCH: THE ACA
—“If conservatives think it’s ridiculous to say conservative legal theorists want to toss the ACA in court why are over a dozen conservative attorneys general plus the conservative US Department of Justice arguing for it?”— Matthew Yglesias
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (Necessary Reciprocity), not Positive Law (Legitimate Authority).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).”
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 14:05:34 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027858230073764
-
ITS ABOUT RULE OF LAW —“One can get around paying for the ACA [Obamacare] anyw
ITS ABOUT RULE OF LAW
—“One can get around paying for the ACA [Obamacare] anyway.”—
Doesn’t matter. What you just suggested is that laws don’t matter, and that rule of law doesn’t matter.
The court, thankfully, is smarter than you are.
Rule of law is the ONLY thing that separates the west from the rest, and public speech as TESTIMONY the origin of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 13:55:17 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027817767114757
-
RT @ConnorMarek: @curtdoolittle Yeah, your absolutely right. I was amazed how in
RT @ConnorMarek: @curtdoolittle Yeah, your absolutely right. I was amazed how intuitive P-law was when I first discovered it. I noticed it…
-
THEY AREN’T JUST OUR ENEMY – THEY ARE THE ENEMY OF ALL MANKIND We know the name
THEY AREN’T JUST OUR ENEMY – THEY ARE THE ENEMY OF ALL MANKIND
We know the name of the Demon (Devil).
He Invented Lying.
His name was Abraham.
He was from Ur.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 13:05:58 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027623863533401
-
NATURAL RELIGION Consider: Instead of the Semitic religion by Abrahamic deceit,
NATURAL RELIGION
Consider: Instead of the Semitic religion by Abrahamic deceit, Rome had institutionalized Aristotle, Natural Law, Stoicism, Epicureanism, Ancestor Worship (kin), and State Loyalty (kin), and retained the teachings of the Greeks and Romans, and the Epic Cycle as bible’.
I mean, if instead of a supernatural church with supernatural justification of natural law functioning as the Supreme Court between the states over an intentionally illiterate population, we had Aristotelian natural law Supreme Court doing the same with a literate population?
NO MORE LIES
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 13:04:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027619686026781
-
Doesn’t matter. What you just suggested is that laws don’t matter, and that rule
Doesn’t matter. What you just suggested is that laws don’t matter, and that rule of law doesn’t matter.
The court, thankfully, is smarter than you are.
Rule of law is the ONLY thing that separates the west from the rest, and public speech as TESTIMONY the origin of it.
Reply addressees: @atwaSDOK @ancestralgriev1 @mattyglesias -
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).” https://t.co/PT98X4hYad -
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).”
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias -
THE PROPER QUADRIVIUM, NOT TRIVIUM Common folk should be trained in grammar, log
THE PROPER QUADRIVIUM, NOT TRIVIUM
Common folk should be trained in grammar, logic, testimony, and rhetoric (the proper quadrivium) so that they are aware of when they are too ignorant to issue opinions (questions, theories, assertions).
If you grasp this you see why the trivium failed.
1-Grammar, 2-Logic, 3-Testimony, 4-RhetoricIf you don’t know Natural Law( P-Law), Behavioral Economics, and Cognitive Science (the mechanics of the brain) you are functionally illiterate today.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 12:39:44 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105027520685100407