Source: Original Site Post

  • “The bible is a History book about God at work thru his people. It’s beautiful &

    —“The bible is a History book about God at work thru his people. It’s beautiful & ugly truth. There’s so many bad examples of people, but that is also encouraging. Sinners is all he has to work with, bc we’ve all fallen short. God honors faith. God gets all the glory bc people fall short.”—-

    Why on earth would you read that horrible book of primitives, violence, superstition and ignorance when you have the greeks, the romans, the brits and the americans? I mean, the middle east is the MOST FAILED SET OF STATES in history. There are three great traditions: European, Chinese, and Hindu. And you choose the worst people of all to learn from? I mean, there is a reason the middle east is poor, dysgenic, violent, ignorant, clannish, and tribal.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 16:38:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105034122874324246

  • @ShereLucas Why on earth would you read that horrible book of primitives, violen

    @ShereLucas Why on earth would you read that horrible book of primitives, violence, superstition and ignorance when you have the greeks, the romans, the brits and the americans? I mean, the middle east is the MOST FAILED SET OF STATES in history. There are three great traditions: European, Chinese, and Hindu. And you choose the worst people of all to learn from? I mean, there is a reason the middle east is poor, dysgenic, violent, ignorant, clannish, and tribal.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 16:37:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105034119248447140

  • #Gab I mean, what’s the point of a 3000 character limit on post size, rather tha

    #Gab I mean, what’s the point of a 3000 character limit on post size, rather than 4000? the ideal article (post) is 750 words. 500 Words can’t do it. Writers for publication work in 750 word blocks. It’s exasperating. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 16:35:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105034109187432148

  • Q&A: Chinese an American Strategy – and the coming change

     

    —Given the current international political economy and the competition unfolding between the US and China. What economic instruments of foreign policies are being utilized to influence each other?— Quora User

    THE CORRECT ANSWER:

    1. Europeans domesticated war instead of forming an empire.

    (a) European history of war limited to states
    (b) scholastic natural law,
    (c) peace of Westphalia
    (d) geneva convention,
    (e) charter of human rights.

    2. China formed an empire because it could not domesticate war.

    3. The postwar strategy was an attempt to domesticate war not just among Europeans but internationally.

    4. European peoples presume this type of domesticated war as normal, natural, or deterministic. (It as abnormal as everything else European)

    5. This strategy failed. It failed because

    (a) we failed to enfranchise Russia upon the fall of the soviet union with the equivalent of a Marshall Plan.
    (b) we tried to make china a peaceful and peer member of the global community. So we alienated our natural allies and empowered our natural enemies.
    (c) We have failed to treat Isalm (and Judaism for that matter) as we did communism and failed to suppress them. We allowed immigration that has brought nonconforming peoples into the western political system without requiring them to adapt to it (integrate).

    6. China has chosen

    (a) total war (informational, technological, economic, political, military, strategic and yes, even demographic), and;
    (b) Fascism (Intolerant State Capitalism), and;
    (c) Chinese global supremacy.

    AMERICAN POSTWAR STRATEGY:

    1) charter of human rights to force nations to focus on the internal improvement of the lives of citizens. Human rights are merely property rights under the Western natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity (scientific law).

    2) The purpose of this charter was to maintain borders (boundaries) so that states put effort into human rights.

    3) The offering was that the USA would enforce borders and human rights in exchange for:

    (a) bearing the sole cost of policing the world system (pattern) of law finance, shipping, and trade
    (b) granting free access to American markets and finance,
    (c) bearing the sole cost of suppressing communism – since 1990 including Islamism, and American and European Jewish bolshevism (Progressivism).
    (d) preserving the peace between states
    (e) dragging the world kicking and screaming into the consumer-capitalist age
    (f) in doing so drag the world into peaceful trade (Adam Smith etc).
    (g) in the presumptive hope that another world war would be prevented -especially given the novelty of nuclear weapons.

    4) The unstated threat was that:

    (a) Yes, all people have the right to self-determination.
    (b) If you choose a method of self-determination that is hostile to the global ambitions (such as globalism, marxism, totalitarianism, expansionism) then you choose poorly.
    (c) If you choose poorly the Americans (all Europeans really) will punish you for it.
    (d) In this sense, the Americans merely inherited and manage the British empire without the benefit of the morality of the British royalty.

    5) The failure of this strategy is that:

    (a) Europeans are genetically more evolved (Neotenous) than all but Japanese-Koreans – meaning that Europeans have spent more time suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and were almost entirely genetically middle class, with a minority of underclass populations. Whereas other than east Asia the rest of the world is predominantly if not vastly overwhelmed by underclass populations.

    (b) Europeans are fairly homogenous, developed the militia, and the LAW as their first institution (not state or religion as the first institution). The first institution like any evolutionary process places limits on the second and third institutions (state or religion in whatever order you develop them).

    (c) Europeans passed through the prehistoric world (developing law as their first institution and the primacy of man and the primacy of self-determination), the ancient world (reason, empiricism, and the primacy of man), the Christian world (exhaustion of forgiveness, and the promise of non-threatening behavior, and de-tribalism and de-clannification), the empirical revolution (restoration of Aristotelianism and reharmonization of our law with our education(religion)), the renaissance (restoration of Arianism and the Primacy of Man), literacy (restoration of self-determination by knowledge), the reformation (restoration of local government), the enlightenment (restoration of trifunctional government), and the agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions. … No other people passed through these phases, and most did the opposite: primitivism of religion, or stagnation of statism.

    (d) The rapid transition through conceptual, political, social, religious, traditional organizations was too much for people and is NOT IN THE INTERESTS of most civilizations with overwhelmingly large underclasses IN THE ABSENCE OF EUROPEAN COLONIAL GOVERNMENT to manage and moderate that transition. A such the world wars ended the colonial program, and abandoned the half-domesticated world to internal conflicts necessary to drag majority underclass populations through what is a majority middle class process of civilizing – and they have found themselves unfit for it. Why? Because in order to do so one needs (i) a genetically middle-class majority sufficient for the formation of a Pareto hierarch (markets) (ii) and a subpopulation of kindred (homogenous clans) under martial government, that enforces natural law (tort and property) and doing so with as little or no corruption possible. So far even India has found this impossible. China has found it impossible because it would cause china (an empire) like Europe to break into smaller states. (Like America is about to.)

    THE UPSHOT

    (a) democracy (preferential redistribution), republicanism (practical economic growth), and monarchy, (necessary military-strategic security) must be practiced together in a balance of powers; the balance of powers must be maintained under empirical rule of law; rule of law (the people), not the parliament, or any government, as sovereign; and as such the enlightenment project has failed. And the optimum government that produced the British empire as well as the northern European monarchies, was mistakenly abandoned for the false promise of endless material growth, the false promise of the nature of man, and the false promise of the malleability of man. Why? Man was not oppressed. He was domesticated like every other plant and animal. And domestication consists largely of culling those who are unproductive, antisocial, or criminal. The colonies weren’t oppressed. They were domesticated like all other natural forces, plants, and animals. And the process of domestication failed with the end of the American Eugenics program, and the postwar pseudoscience of the Jewish Marxists, Neo-Marxists, postmodernists, and feminists.

    (b) Europeans will, like all other peoples, have to give up on their hegemony and return to the traditional historical world order of a conflict of civilizations, each managing its own resource and trade systems. We must isolate Islam and allow it to have its civil wars and form nation-states. We must close our borders OR limit it to university graduates in the hard sciences, and restore forcible integration.

    Truth sometimes hurts. But it is still true.

  • Q&A: Chinese an American Strategy – and the coming change

     

    —Given the current international political economy and the competition unfolding between the US and China. What economic instruments of foreign policies are being utilized to influence each other?— Quora User

    THE CORRECT ANSWER:

    1. Europeans domesticated war instead of forming an empire.

    (a) European history of war limited to states
    (b) scholastic natural law,
    (c) peace of Westphalia
    (d) geneva convention,
    (e) charter of human rights.

    2. China formed an empire because it could not domesticate war.

    3. The postwar strategy was an attempt to domesticate war not just among Europeans but internationally.

    4. European peoples presume this type of domesticated war as normal, natural, or deterministic. (It as abnormal as everything else European)

    5. This strategy failed. It failed because

    (a) we failed to enfranchise Russia upon the fall of the soviet union with the equivalent of a Marshall Plan.
    (b) we tried to make china a peaceful and peer member of the global community. So we alienated our natural allies and empowered our natural enemies.
    (c) We have failed to treat Isalm (and Judaism for that matter) as we did communism and failed to suppress them. We allowed immigration that has brought nonconforming peoples into the western political system without requiring them to adapt to it (integrate).

    6. China has chosen

    (a) total war (informational, technological, economic, political, military, strategic and yes, even demographic), and;
    (b) Fascism (Intolerant State Capitalism), and;
    (c) Chinese global supremacy.

    AMERICAN POSTWAR STRATEGY:

    1) charter of human rights to force nations to focus on the internal improvement of the lives of citizens. Human rights are merely property rights under the Western natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity (scientific law).

    2) The purpose of this charter was to maintain borders (boundaries) so that states put effort into human rights.

    3) The offering was that the USA would enforce borders and human rights in exchange for:

    (a) bearing the sole cost of policing the world system (pattern) of law finance, shipping, and trade
    (b) granting free access to American markets and finance,
    (c) bearing the sole cost of suppressing communism – since 1990 including Islamism, and American and European Jewish bolshevism (Progressivism).
    (d) preserving the peace between states
    (e) dragging the world kicking and screaming into the consumer-capitalist age
    (f) in doing so drag the world into peaceful trade (Adam Smith etc).
    (g) in the presumptive hope that another world war would be prevented -especially given the novelty of nuclear weapons.

    4) The unstated threat was that:

    (a) Yes, all people have the right to self-determination.
    (b) If you choose a method of self-determination that is hostile to the global ambitions (such as globalism, marxism, totalitarianism, expansionism) then you choose poorly.
    (c) If you choose poorly the Americans (all Europeans really) will punish you for it.
    (d) In this sense, the Americans merely inherited and manage the British empire without the benefit of the morality of the British royalty.

    5) The failure of this strategy is that:

    (a) Europeans are genetically more evolved (Neotenous) than all but Japanese-Koreans – meaning that Europeans have spent more time suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and were almost entirely genetically middle class, with a minority of underclass populations. Whereas other than east Asia the rest of the world is predominantly if not vastly overwhelmed by underclass populations.

    (b) Europeans are fairly homogenous, developed the militia, and the LAW as their first institution (not state or religion as the first institution). The first institution like any evolutionary process places limits on the second and third institutions (state or religion in whatever order you develop them).

    (c) Europeans passed through the prehistoric world (developing law as their first institution and the primacy of man and the primacy of self-determination), the ancient world (reason, empiricism, and the primacy of man), the Christian world (exhaustion of forgiveness, and the promise of non-threatening behavior, and de-tribalism and de-clannification), the empirical revolution (restoration of Aristotelianism and reharmonization of our law with our education(religion)), the renaissance (restoration of Arianism and the Primacy of Man), literacy (restoration of self-determination by knowledge), the reformation (restoration of local government), the enlightenment (restoration of trifunctional government), and the agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, and scientific revolutions. … No other people passed through these phases, and most did the opposite: primitivism of religion, or stagnation of statism.

    (d) The rapid transition through conceptual, political, social, religious, traditional organizations was too much for people and is NOT IN THE INTERESTS of most civilizations with overwhelmingly large underclasses IN THE ABSENCE OF EUROPEAN COLONIAL GOVERNMENT to manage and moderate that transition. A such the world wars ended the colonial program, and abandoned the half-domesticated world to internal conflicts necessary to drag majority underclass populations through what is a majority middle class process of civilizing – and they have found themselves unfit for it. Why? Because in order to do so one needs (i) a genetically middle-class majority sufficient for the formation of a Pareto hierarch (markets) (ii) and a subpopulation of kindred (homogenous clans) under martial government, that enforces natural law (tort and property) and doing so with as little or no corruption possible. So far even India has found this impossible. China has found it impossible because it would cause china (an empire) like Europe to break into smaller states. (Like America is about to.)

    THE UPSHOT

    (a) democracy (preferential redistribution), republicanism (practical economic growth), and monarchy, (necessary military-strategic security) must be practiced together in a balance of powers; the balance of powers must be maintained under empirical rule of law; rule of law (the people), not the parliament, or any government, as sovereign; and as such the enlightenment project has failed. And the optimum government that produced the British empire as well as the northern European monarchies, was mistakenly abandoned for the false promise of endless material growth, the false promise of the nature of man, and the false promise of the malleability of man. Why? Man was not oppressed. He was domesticated like every other plant and animal. And domestication consists largely of culling those who are unproductive, antisocial, or criminal. The colonies weren’t oppressed. They were domesticated like all other natural forces, plants, and animals. And the process of domestication failed with the end of the American Eugenics program, and the postwar pseudoscience of the Jewish Marxists, Neo-Marxists, postmodernists, and feminists.

    (b) Europeans will, like all other peoples, have to give up on their hegemony and return to the traditional historical world order of a conflict of civilizations, each managing its own resource and trade systems. We must isolate Islam and allow it to have its civil wars and form nation-states. We must close our borders OR limit it to university graduates in the hard sciences, and restore forcible integration.

    Truth sometimes hurts. But it is still true.

  • THOUGHTS Strategy, like morality, is almost impossible to discuss because the fi

    THOUGHTS
    Strategy, like morality, is almost impossible to discuss because the first principles are not established. Only Militaries and Kings understand strategy because only Militaries and Kings can operationally afford to.

    Those states that most have to fear instability and insurrection within – and where the military’s primary responsibility is internal stability rather than out of area wars.

    Most strategic writing is nonsense because it doesn’t tell you what you need to know if you’re running 90% of the countries in the world throughout history. its only for those who can externally project power.

    Once you know what the natural law requires, you build a military that will make it possible internally by creating rule of law, so that you can build a military that will transform to make it possible externally.

    This is why only those civilizations (only Europeans) that develop rule of law as their first institution, state as their second, and religion only as their third can develop a high trust polity. And the second dirty secret is that this can only occur in a homogenous polity, where the incentives to respect natural law already exist, and the contrary incentives (tribalism) don’t.

    ONE NEEDS RULE OF LAW INTERNALLY. ONE NEEDS STRATEGY EXTERNALLY.

    P-Law establishes the first principles of law, politics, group strategy, strategy, and war.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 14:46:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033680810251698

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033676711832456


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    VIDEO: MILITARY STRATEGY – A GLOBAL HISTORY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq5lemhX6vo COMMENTS Smart speaker. Well done. The west strategically won Vietnam. The consequence of the west’s strategy is that we drove Russia and China together. … The great failure was not uniting with Russia WHEN THEY ASKED FOR IT. (CD: We anglos are always strategically stupid) All the south had to do to win is to make the north not win. (CD: Politics is not (yet) empirical. Democracy is anti-empirical. Republics and Democracies are Terrible at strategies. ) … With present pressures, we are likely to see more internal stresses (violence). … We see those not using external forces as peaceful, but if we look at the suppression of Marxists in India, that’s war. (CD: Why isn’t the left’s prosecution of white males and western civilization by institutional means not war?) …. Jomini or Clausewitz don’t tell you much useful about 19th, 20th, or 21st-century states where conflicts are largely internal. (CD: I think this is better stated as the history of western evolution of the domestication of warfare is an intellectual prison still constraining the western mind when Leftists, Islam and China, do not have this same error. The Chinese do not play rules-based-strategy they rely only on power of self-interest.) Americans love to think of themselves as living in a failed state, it is still the most successful state. (CD: I disagree and I am certain that we will have a civil war very shortly.) The military does not have a practice of interfering in government, but the government does in the military and the reason the military hasn’t to date (CD: but will). … (more)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033676711832456

  • Britain is an appeasing power. (CD: British are moralists but like the medieval

    Britain is an appeasing power. (CD: British are moralists but like the medieval Chinese this has become their political failing.) There are two American foreign policies at the miliary level that are in conflict. And the USA is trying to extricate itself from it. (CD: interviewer correctly states that without goal and exit strategy one is not entering into a war one can win. — my opinion is that asking men to risk their lives (make costly investment) results in betrayal if abandoned. This is one of those problems the current military faces. ) Want no disjuncture between the military and society. (CD: again, I’ll harp on military service in exchange for political access). Same for American perception of American police (CD: under-trained, and not trained, and the public is intentionally ignorant. Again, we have a problem of politics. Again, monarchy-state-military, parliament-commons, market-production, church(school)-education. ) Strategic culture – can’t believe a word the Chinese say – each state, as a result of its cultural character, a set of strategic goals, (CD: incentives). And that we must address them by their strategic goals (CD: NOT OURS. It’s this conflict that creates conflict.). Grand strategy is an oddly American term. It assumes that there is a clear set of international goals. (CD: there are – they as a set). Scottish national party would still like another referendum. They would like to close a nuclear base. And it’s the most important base in Britain. … (almost out of time notice from interviewer) … (CD: the general problem of western, Jewish, islamist, and chinese universalism, rather than world particularism.) You don’t get to make a strategy and stick with it. Strategy is about thinking long term and adjusting. 1848 america did not hold onto gains in mexico. like to talk about ww2, and you shouldn’t assume perfection in politics, esp strategy, and too many people assume there is a perfect outcome possible. (Conversation ends)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 14:45:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033678744576722

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033676711832456


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    VIDEO: MILITARY STRATEGY – A GLOBAL HISTORY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq5lemhX6vo COMMENTS Smart speaker. Well done. The west strategically won Vietnam. The consequence of the west’s strategy is that we drove Russia and China together. … The great failure was not uniting with Russia WHEN THEY ASKED FOR IT. (CD: We anglos are always strategically stupid) All the south had to do to win is to make the north not win. (CD: Politics is not (yet) empirical. Democracy is anti-empirical. Republics and Democracies are Terrible at strategies. ) … With present pressures, we are likely to see more internal stresses (violence). … We see those not using external forces as peaceful, but if we look at the suppression of Marxists in India, that’s war. (CD: Why isn’t the left’s prosecution of white males and western civilization by institutional means not war?) …. Jomini or Clausewitz don’t tell you much useful about 19th, 20th, or 21st-century states where conflicts are largely internal. (CD: I think this is better stated as the history of western evolution of the domestication of warfare is an intellectual prison still constraining the western mind when Leftists, Islam and China, do not have this same error. The Chinese do not play rules-based-strategy they rely only on power of self-interest.) Americans love to think of themselves as living in a failed state, it is still the most successful state. (CD: I disagree and I am certain that we will have a civil war very shortly.) The military does not have a practice of interfering in government, but the government does in the military and the reason the military hasn’t to date (CD: but will). … (more)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033676711832456

  • VIDEO: MILITARY STRATEGY – A GLOBAL HISTORY COMMENTS Smart speaker. Well done. T

    VIDEO: MILITARY STRATEGY – A GLOBAL HISTORY
    youtube.com/watch?v=bq5lemhX6vo

    COMMENTS
    Smart speaker. Well done. The west strategically won Vietnam. The consequence of the west’s strategy is that we drove Russia and China together. … The great failure was not uniting with Russia WHEN THEY ASKED FOR IT. (CD: We anglos are always strategically stupid) All the south had to do to win is to make the north not win. (CD: Politics is not (yet) empirical. Democracy is anti-empirical. Republics and Democracies are Terrible at strategies. ) … With present pressures, we are likely to see more internal stresses (violence). … We see those not using external forces as peaceful, but if we look at the suppression of Marxists in India, that’s war. (CD: Why isn’t the left’s prosecution of white males and western civilization by institutional means not war?) …. Jomini or Clausewitz don’t tell you much useful about 19th, 20th, or 21st-century states where conflicts are largely internal. (CD: I think this is better stated as the history of western evolution of the domestication of warfare is an intellectual prison still constraining the western mind when Leftists, Islam and China, do not have this same error. The Chinese do not play rules-based-strategy they rely only on power of self-interest.) Americans love to think of themselves as living in a failed state, it is still the most successful state. (CD: I disagree and I am certain that we will have a civil war very shortly.) The military does not have a practice of interfering in government, but the government does in the military and the reason the military hasn’t to date (CD: but will). … (more)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 14:45:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033676711832456

  • VIDEO: MILITARY STRATEGY – A GLOBAL HISTORY COMMENTS AND THOUGHTS The west strat

    VIDEO: MILITARY STRATEGY – A GLOBAL HISTORY
    youtube.com/watch?v=bq5lemhX6vo

    COMMENTS AND THOUGHTS

    The west strategically won Vietnam. The west’s fundamental strategy is that we drive russia and china together. The great failure was not uniting with russia WHEN THEY ASKED FOR IT. (We are always stupid) All the south had to do to win is to make the north not win. Politics is not (yet) empirical. Democracy is anti-empirical. Republics and Democracies are Terrible at strategies.

    Strategy like morality is almost impossible to discuss, because the first principles are not established. Only Militaries and Kings understand strategy because only Militaries and Kings can operationally afford to.

    Those states that most have to fear instability and insurrection within – and where the military’s primary responsibility is internal stability rather than out of area wars.

    Most stratgic writing is nonsense bcause it doesn’t tell you what you need to know if you’re running 90% of the countries in the world throughout history. its only for those who can externally project power.

    Once you know what the natural law requires, you build a military that will make it possible internally by creating rult of law, so that you can build a military that will transform to make it possible externally.

    This is why only those civilizations (only europeans) that develop rule of law as their first institution, state as their second, and religion only as their third can develop a high trust polity. And the second dirty secret is that this can only occurr in a homogenous polity, where the incentives to respect natural law already exist, and the contrary incentives (tribalism) don’t.

    YOU NEED RULE OF LAW INTERNALLY. YOU NEED STRATEGY EXTERNALLY.

    P-Law establishes the first principles of law, politics, group strategy, strategy, and war.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 14:16:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105033562718342022

  • @WorMartiN Yes, and this is Daniel Gurpide’s argument as well. How do you combin

    @WorMartiN Yes, and this is Daniel Gurpide’s argument as well. How do you combine epicurus (empiricism in the physical), aristotle (empiricism in the political), and the stoics (empiricism in psychology)?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 20:47:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105029438101006333