Source: Original Site Post

  • TRUTH FOR CLAIMS, RECIPROCITY FOR PROPOSITIONS —“Truth is what we test for in

    TRUTH FOR CLAIMS, RECIPROCITY FOR PROPOSITIONS

    —“Truth is what we test for in claims, reciprocity is what we test for in propositions.”— Martin Stepan

    In Response To:

    Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity is a constraint of truth, depends on whether the context of the question is decidability in law (top-down) or decidability in physics (bottom-up).
    But it’s the same either way.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-20 15:51:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105067911849132759

  • The plan is to get the USA to nearly 600M population so that we are a competitit

    The plan is to get the USA to nearly 600M population so that we are a competititor to china (whose population will crater later this century) and india (whose population will surpass china). My plan is to cut the population to under two hundred million – for good reason.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-20 15:48:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105067898692078397

  • IMPORTANT: Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity i

    IMPORTANT: Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity is a constraint of truth, depends on whether the context of the question is decidability in law (top-down) or decidability in physics (bottom-up). But it’s the same either way.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-20 15:48:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105067897536465816

  • @Oikophobia @LodiSilverado And you apparently can’t use google. 😉

    @Oikophobia@LodiSilverado And you apparently can’t use google. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 20:17:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105063295068277556

  • @Oikophobia @LodiSilverado (You’re unworthy of my time, but at present i’ve done

    @Oikophobia@LodiSilverado (You’re unworthy of my time, but at present i’ve done the most thorough work on the jewish (abrahamic) method of deceit, it’s evolution and origins. You can either make an argument or you can’t. Go ahead and try. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 19:37:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105063135819599426

  • WE CAN REBUILD IT —“Does anyone think it would be better if Czechoslovakia sti

    WE CAN REBUILD IT

    —“Does anyone think it would be better if Czechoslovakia still existed as an integrated state?”—Outsideness

    1) Does anyone NOT think NE Italy, Austria, Hungary, Czechs, Romanians, West Ukraine(Galacia), Slovakia, and whatever non-muslim Balkans would be better if the Austro-Hungarian empire still existed? … Or that Europe wouldn’t be better if the Holy Roman (German) empire existed?

    2) France is, and always has been, the enemy of European civilization. France is the fountain of bad ideas. Napoleon it’s downfall, french ‘counter-empiricism’ we falsely call the enlightenment, and french revolution, and political theory the origins of decline.

    3) There is no superior government to rule of law, by intolerant, ethnocentric, common law of tort, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses as markets for production of commons between classes, and markets association, reproduction, cooperation, production.

    4) The germans evolved, the British implemented it, the Americans codified it, and the french destroyed germanic civilization, the germans tried to restore it, the rest of Europe tried to prevent it, and now french in Europe jews in America win by immigration not achievements.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 14:51:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105062013530203233

  • ATTACKS FROM LEFT (LIES ABOUT MAN) AND RIGHT (LIES ABOUT NATURE) Darwin was vici

    ATTACKS FROM LEFT (LIES ABOUT MAN) AND RIGHT (LIES ABOUT NATURE)

    Darwin was viciously and consistently attacked for a long time. P-Law (and I) will be viciously and consistently attacked for the same reason. But this time it’s even more on the left than the right. This is important:the left is pseudoscientific about man, and the right, nature.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 14:27:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105061919955528624

  • THE SECOND JEWISH WAR AGAINST TRUTH 1) To the young, it appears as though we hav

    THE SECOND JEWISH WAR AGAINST TRUTH

    1) To the young, it appears as though we have learned as much since 1999 as we did since 1830. But this isn’t true. It’s that it took us from 1980 until today to reverse the Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter-Revolution and the postwar destruction of our intellectual institutions.

    2) Freud (pseudoscientific nature of the mind), Boaz (of societies), Marx (economics and politics), Gramsci- Adorno-Fromm (culture, values, aesthetics), Friedan (marriage and family), Derrida (truth, reason, science), the HBD-Denialists (sex, class, culture and race differences).

    3) By 1955 we falsified marxism-socialism, by ’70 the great society and soviet models, by ’80 psychology, by 90 sociology, Neoteny, IQ, Conscientiousness and class differences, by 2000 the blank slate, by 2012 sex differences, by 2019 race differences, and soon, civ differences.

    4) So we have been in a race between western civilization and western science to preserve Darwinian revolution, and the Jewish counter-revolution against western truth, reason, the Darwinian revolution, by failed ideas, with our defeat only by invasion by less capable peoples.

    5) In other words we win or lose by our tolerance for invasion and undermining, not because of our ideas. But becaue of our tolerance and compassion and christian optimism (faith) over aristotelian reason (evidence).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 14:26:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105061915620364042

  • Boost of @curtd THE SECOND JEWISH WAR AGAINST TRUTH 1) To the young, it appears

    Boost of @curtd THE SECOND JEWISH WAR AGAINST TRUTH

    1) To the young, it appears as though we have learned as much since 1999 as we did since 1830. But this isn’t true. It’s that it took us from 1980 until today to reverse the Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter-Revolution and the postwar destruction of our intellectual institutions.

    2) Freud (pseudoscientific nature of the mind), Boaz (of societies), Marx (economics and politics), Gramsci- Adorno-Fromm (culture, values, aesthetics), Friedan (marriage and family), Derrida (truth, reason, science), the HBD-Denialists (sex, class, culture and race differences).

    3) By 1955 we falsified marxism-socialism, by ’70 the great society and soviet models, by ’80 psychology, by 90 sociology, Neoteny, IQ, Conscientiousness and class differences, by 2000 the blank slate, by 2012 sex differences, by 2019 race differences, and soon, civ differences.

    4) So we have been in a race between western civilization and western science to preserve Darwinian revolution, and the Jewish counter-revolution against western truth, reason, the Darwinian revolution, by failed ideas, with our defeat only by invasion by less capable peoples.

    5) In other words we win or lose by our tolerance for invasion and undermining, not because of our ideas. But becaue of our tolerance and compassion and christian optimism (faith) over aristotelian reason (evidence).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 14:26:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105752517665701409