Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Alt Right Can’t Reform

    —“Most of those would be serious critics, or fellow travelers, have chosen to ignore CD as a crank, deconstructing life, the universe, & everything in a sandbox. It doesn’t matter if you’re a new Athanasius Kircher, if you irritate men into avoiding you.”—

    Truth isn’t a popularity contest. Darwin irritated a lot of those same (ahem) ‘men’. I’m only interested in those who are interested as well. And irritating what we might questionably call ‘men’ who are nazis, xians, or idiots serves my interests: Data says they’re dead weight.

    John’s idea was that we could combine my work on reform, with the alt-right’s agitation, and despite the conflict between intellectual and emotional, turn you morons into something other than sexual, social, economic, and political anal leakage. You failed our test too. 😉

    So, we gave up on you. You want what will fail. You won’t learn from your failures. You won’t accept what WILL work. So you fail and re-fail. Every single person that has tried to unite the right has failed. We failed too. Y’all get what you deserve because you get what you earn.

    The only way to succeed is to marginalize you like everyone else has marginalized you. To continue to let them silence you. Because you will not favor the group, get in line, stay on strategy, stay on message, and take orders. You’re done. You’re disagreeable. It’s your fate.

    And as your future continues to evaporate dooming you to your fate as removed from the gene pool you will continue to double down on your failings like all idiots do, and fade into nothing – more nothing than you are now. Meme’s aren’t power. They’re cowardly apes flinging feces.

  • The Alt Right Can’t Reform

    —“Most of those would be serious critics, or fellow travelers, have chosen to ignore CD as a crank, deconstructing life, the universe, & everything in a sandbox. It doesn’t matter if you’re a new Athanasius Kircher, if you irritate men into avoiding you.”—

    Truth isn’t a popularity contest. Darwin irritated a lot of those same (ahem) ‘men’. I’m only interested in those who are interested as well. And irritating what we might questionably call ‘men’ who are nazis, xians, or idiots serves my interests: Data says they’re dead weight.

    John’s idea was that we could combine my work on reform, with the alt-right’s agitation, and despite the conflict between intellectual and emotional, turn you morons into something other than sexual, social, economic, and political anal leakage. You failed our test too. 😉

    So, we gave up on you. You want what will fail. You won’t learn from your failures. You won’t accept what WILL work. So you fail and re-fail. Every single person that has tried to unite the right has failed. We failed too. Y’all get what you deserve because you get what you earn.

    The only way to succeed is to marginalize you like everyone else has marginalized you. To continue to let them silence you. Because you will not favor the group, get in line, stay on strategy, stay on message, and take orders. You’re done. You’re disagreeable. It’s your fate.

    And as your future continues to evaporate dooming you to your fate as removed from the gene pool you will continue to double down on your failings like all idiots do, and fade into nothing – more nothing than you are now. Meme’s aren’t power. They’re cowardly apes flinging feces.

  • Are You Done With The Invasive Elite Species Yet?

    Are you done with the ‘Invasive Elite Species’ yet? They’ve managed to destroy over a thousand years of european evolutionary progress in just seventy by selling false promises to women and then immigrating underclasses, and creating the dumbest generation in our history.

    I end up talking about the law on race, the jews, the Abrahamic method of deceit, sex, class, and group differences in value, strategy, cognition, and means of argument – because that’s THE problem: HETEROGENEITY is destructive. There is a reason the middle east is a sh-hole.

  • Are You Done With The Invasive Elite Species Yet?

    Are you done with the ‘Invasive Elite Species’ yet? They’ve managed to destroy over a thousand years of european evolutionary progress in just seventy by selling false promises to women and then immigrating underclasses, and creating the dumbest generation in our history.

    I end up talking about the law on race, the jews, the Abrahamic method of deceit, sex, class, and group differences in value, strategy, cognition, and means of argument – because that’s THE problem: HETEROGENEITY is destructive. There is a reason the middle east is a sh-hole.

  • The Via Negativa Of Increasing Computational Efficiency in Man

    We all tend to think in the via-positiva. But the correct way of thinking about the universe is the removal of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, by increasing our individual and collective computational ability by making it closer to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

    The same via-negativa is true of populations: it is more important to cull the bottom than it is to improve the middle or top. The same is true of policy: it is better to suppress irreciprocity and falsehood than it is to make good political policy.

    When we increase our computational efficiency (less error), we capture more calories (gains) from the universe (entropy). So the more negative we eliminate the more computation ALL people can exercise on the positive. Thats what SCIENCE HAS DONE.

  • The Via Negativa Of Increasing Computational Efficiency in Man

    We all tend to think in the via-positiva. But the correct way of thinking about the universe is the removal of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, by increasing our individual and collective computational ability by making it closer to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

    The same via-negativa is true of populations: it is more important to cull the bottom than it is to improve the middle or top. The same is true of policy: it is better to suppress irreciprocity and falsehood than it is to make good political policy.

    When we increase our computational efficiency (less error), we capture more calories (gains) from the universe (entropy). So the more negative we eliminate the more computation ALL people can exercise on the positive. Thats what SCIENCE HAS DONE.

  • Natural Religion: The Price We Must Pay

    P-Law will produce the wants of Reactionaries: “life, family, community, quality”. It will just do it using formal logic, law, and court as market for suppression of violators that is very difficult if not impossible to undermine, instead of mythology, philosophy, or religion.

    Groups must use organizations and generations that require an oppressive authority to indoctrinate values. If you have a ‘book’ that is not scripture but science, not wisdom but law, then religion to indoctrinate people will evolve within it, and that law will be absorbed by it.

    I’m not a storyteller but a formal scientist, and don’t see it as my job to produce mythology, religion, or indoctrination – that’s a creative enterprise, not a scientific one. My job, the P-Judiciary’s job, and P-Law’s job is to DOCUMENT the law of nature and nature’s god.

    So you may not see my work as religious but that’s because a religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule.

    So there need be no difference between truth, science, law, politics, and religion, if there are no human lies therein. And instead, our religion consists of the wonder of each of us cooperating by competing AND insuring one another as we revel in transcendence not resistance.

    There is only one price to pay for such a religion and that is regulation of the reproduction of the population at the bottom, and compensating them for their ‘loss’. Most religions – all Abrahamic religions – are today devolutionary instead. Anti-man, anti-evolutionary cults.

  • Natural Religion: The Price We Must Pay

    P-Law will produce the wants of Reactionaries: “life, family, community, quality”. It will just do it using formal logic, law, and court as market for suppression of violators that is very difficult if not impossible to undermine, instead of mythology, philosophy, or religion.

    Groups must use organizations and generations that require an oppressive authority to indoctrinate values. If you have a ‘book’ that is not scripture but science, not wisdom but law, then religion to indoctrinate people will evolve within it, and that law will be absorbed by it.

    I’m not a storyteller but a formal scientist, and don’t see it as my job to produce mythology, religion, or indoctrination – that’s a creative enterprise, not a scientific one. My job, the P-Judiciary’s job, and P-Law’s job is to DOCUMENT the law of nature and nature’s god.

    So you may not see my work as religious but that’s because a religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule.

    So there need be no difference between truth, science, law, politics, and religion, if there are no human lies therein. And instead, our religion consists of the wonder of each of us cooperating by competing AND insuring one another as we revel in transcendence not resistance.

    There is only one price to pay for such a religion and that is regulation of the reproduction of the population at the bottom, and compensating them for their ‘loss’. Most religions – all Abrahamic religions – are today devolutionary instead. Anti-man, anti-evolutionary cults.

  • Quotes From Today (Election Day)

     

    I don’t care what system of government, economy, social order, or faith that you construct – it will be governed by the laws that I state and produce the outcomes I state. There is no difference between physics and behavior except for our memory of cooperative debits and credits.

    I reduced western civilization to first causes. Then discovered it was just the most conformant to the laws of the universe. It’s that tedious process that made me understand western superiority isn’t a opinon, it’s a scientific fact. We have one flaw: christian tolerance.

    The Ultimate Religion is not the religion of everyone. It’s the religion of everyone capable of it. The rest, frankly, they don’t matter.

    If someone can’t understand some branch of mathematics, or logic, or science they’re perfectly happy to say that it’s beyond their understanding. But as soon as we move from formal and physical science to behavioral science, everyone seems to think they have a valuable opinion.

    Really I don’t have critics of the work. Just of me. That’s ok. Same for other ‘disagreeable’ people in history. This isn’t a popularity contest. Unfortunately, people intuit that formal behavioral science needs their approval as if it’s ideology or philosophy. Sorry. Wrong.

    I do my job. Which is to make no presumptions, and falsify until only the truth is left standing. This is the truth that is left standing. Everyone wants me to take the shortcut. I don’t shortcut. I have to construct a proof. P-Law is constructed of proofs from first causes (first principles). If I take your shortcut (even if I intuit that you’re right) I haven’t constructed a proof. P-Law is a Formal Science. So it’s the natural endpoint of logic, science, law, and religion: the One Law, and the One Religion. The mythology is up to others to write. Although our ancestors did a pretty good job if we remove the Semitic deceits and restate christianity as science.

    In the simplest of terms all political ideology, all philosophy, and theology attempts to construct some sort of scam to avoid paying the psychological cost of adherence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

    I should just automate this response: (A) Not an argument. (B) GSRRM because you don’t have one, (C) This is Twitter – ultra-short form. (D) And intro to behavioral economics and natural law must use simple examples that newbs can intuit. Go here for GSRRM: BTW: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/05/31/what-does-gsrrm-stand-for-full-version/

    That’s what frustrates me. Everything good in Xianity can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And it’s SCIENTIFICALLY TRUE. But for some reason people feel this desperate need for woo that is just incomprehensible to the rest of us. Yeah. We need some kinda church. Not lies.

    [They] always lie. Because the world fantasy tey desire is impossible except in their imaginations and justified by social construction, in competition with daily falsification in reality.

    There isn’t any difference between left, libertarian, and right NPCs. The question isn’t whether we have free will, but just how hard and rare it is not to be a bot for your genes, repeating the hoots and whistles of your gene pool.

    Androgeny to males is equal to giving it away to females. Same issue, same response. Discounts the market.

    Women are attracted to their value of men, but more so to the power of women – power that they can follow, imitate, and master. Women are emotional and psychological puppeteers on one end and social superpredators on the other. Men are just resources as women are just objects.  Only about 1/3 of men even exist in women’s mental world. Men are not even objects. They are potential resources or they’re threats. Women choose the best men they can get while still puppeteering. And are more driven by keeping those men from others than having them themselves.

     

     

  • Quotes From Today (Election Day)

     

    I don’t care what system of government, economy, social order, or faith that you construct – it will be governed by the laws that I state and produce the outcomes I state. There is no difference between physics and behavior except for our memory of cooperative debits and credits.

    I reduced western civilization to first causes. Then discovered it was just the most conformant to the laws of the universe. It’s that tedious process that made me understand western superiority isn’t a opinon, it’s a scientific fact. We have one flaw: christian tolerance.

    The Ultimate Religion is not the religion of everyone. It’s the religion of everyone capable of it. The rest, frankly, they don’t matter.

    If someone can’t understand some branch of mathematics, or logic, or science they’re perfectly happy to say that it’s beyond their understanding. But as soon as we move from formal and physical science to behavioral science, everyone seems to think they have a valuable opinion.

    Really I don’t have critics of the work. Just of me. That’s ok. Same for other ‘disagreeable’ people in history. This isn’t a popularity contest. Unfortunately, people intuit that formal behavioral science needs their approval as if it’s ideology or philosophy. Sorry. Wrong.

    I do my job. Which is to make no presumptions, and falsify until only the truth is left standing. This is the truth that is left standing. Everyone wants me to take the shortcut. I don’t shortcut. I have to construct a proof. P-Law is constructed of proofs from first causes (first principles). If I take your shortcut (even if I intuit that you’re right) I haven’t constructed a proof. P-Law is a Formal Science. So it’s the natural endpoint of logic, science, law, and religion: the One Law, and the One Religion. The mythology is up to others to write. Although our ancestors did a pretty good job if we remove the Semitic deceits and restate christianity as science.

    In the simplest of terms all political ideology, all philosophy, and theology attempts to construct some sort of scam to avoid paying the psychological cost of adherence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

    I should just automate this response: (A) Not an argument. (B) GSRRM because you don’t have one, (C) This is Twitter – ultra-short form. (D) And intro to behavioral economics and natural law must use simple examples that newbs can intuit. Go here for GSRRM: BTW: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/05/31/what-does-gsrrm-stand-for-full-version/

    That’s what frustrates me. Everything good in Xianity can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And it’s SCIENTIFICALLY TRUE. But for some reason people feel this desperate need for woo that is just incomprehensible to the rest of us. Yeah. We need some kinda church. Not lies.

    [They] always lie. Because the world fantasy tey desire is impossible except in their imaginations and justified by social construction, in competition with daily falsification in reality.

    There isn’t any difference between left, libertarian, and right NPCs. The question isn’t whether we have free will, but just how hard and rare it is not to be a bot for your genes, repeating the hoots and whistles of your gene pool.

    Androgeny to males is equal to giving it away to females. Same issue, same response. Discounts the market.

    Women are attracted to their value of men, but more so to the power of women – power that they can follow, imitate, and master. Women are emotional and psychological puppeteers on one end and social superpredators on the other. Men are just resources as women are just objects.  Only about 1/3 of men even exist in women’s mental world. Men are not even objects. They are potential resources or they’re threats. Women choose the best men they can get while still puppeteering. And are more driven by keeping those men from others than having them themselves.