THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK: IT ALL BEGINS WITH WAR [I] really want the history of economics to hold the social science’s intellectual high ground. But the fact of the matter is, that after consuming most of intellectual history, in hundreds of books, the most important book on social science that I have ever read remains The History of Warfare by Keegan. It is a work of insight, depth and scholarship that none of the religious, social, political or economic historians have come close to matching. We live our warfare first. That is the foundation of our civilizations. Everything else rests upon it – and more importantly, everything else depends upon it. Our ability to deny others control over geography, determines our ability to construct institutions, which determines our ability to accumulate capital. All property is constructed after all, from the ability to deny others use of that which we claim a monopoly of control over. All prosperity depends upon the formation of property rights. And all property rights depend on the organized application of violence.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Demand For Authority : Suppressing Retribution For Anti-Social, Unethical, and Immoral Actions
THE PURPOSE OF AN AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT IS TO SUPPRESS RETRIBUTION FOR ANTI-SOCIAL, UNETHICAL AND IMMORAL ACTIONS. (and it’s genocidal) [T]he purpose of an investigatory police, is to concentrate knowledge of troublesome individuals and groups into the hands of specialists. So that crime can be investigated and reduced if not eliminated, by the suppression of, control of, and elimination of troublesome individuals and groups. We require, an investigatory police force, in the case of anonymous crimes, we cannot all of us possess such intimate knowledge of the minority who engage in career criminality. The more immoral the society, the more unethical the society, the more anti-social a society, the more need for various kinds of police to suppress retaliation against those who we KNOW, who are NOT anonymous, and who have committed anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. When we cannot use the courts to sue for restitution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions, the state must suppress our retribution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. The state currently punishes retribution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions – whereas in history, the job of all men, was to punish violations of anti-social, unethical, and immoral norms. [S]o instead, the state has LICENSED AND ADVOCATED anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions, by forbidding and punishing retribution for, and suppression of, anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. The state is the manufacturer of anti-social, unethical and immoral action. Why? In America, it is the conquest of conservative protestantism (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Britain it is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Europe is is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Canada it is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples (the french, and now the immigrants). In Russia they are trying to prohibit the conquest of their low trust people, by even lower trust peoples. REVERSE COLONIZATION We are being colonized so that statists can free ride, and the lower classes can live off the productivity of the middle classes and prevent the middle classes from breeding in sufficient numbers to retain their economic competitiveness and their high trust norms. If colonialism was immoral then surely reverse colonialism is immoral. It is certainly genocide.
-
Demand For Authority : Suppressing Retribution For Anti-Social, Unethical, and Immoral Actions
THE PURPOSE OF AN AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT IS TO SUPPRESS RETRIBUTION FOR ANTI-SOCIAL, UNETHICAL AND IMMORAL ACTIONS. (and it’s genocidal) [T]he purpose of an investigatory police, is to concentrate knowledge of troublesome individuals and groups into the hands of specialists. So that crime can be investigated and reduced if not eliminated, by the suppression of, control of, and elimination of troublesome individuals and groups. We require, an investigatory police force, in the case of anonymous crimes, we cannot all of us possess such intimate knowledge of the minority who engage in career criminality. The more immoral the society, the more unethical the society, the more anti-social a society, the more need for various kinds of police to suppress retaliation against those who we KNOW, who are NOT anonymous, and who have committed anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. When we cannot use the courts to sue for restitution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions, the state must suppress our retribution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. The state currently punishes retribution for anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions – whereas in history, the job of all men, was to punish violations of anti-social, unethical, and immoral norms. [S]o instead, the state has LICENSED AND ADVOCATED anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions, by forbidding and punishing retribution for, and suppression of, anti-social, unethical, and immoral actions. The state is the manufacturer of anti-social, unethical and immoral action. Why? In America, it is the conquest of conservative protestantism (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Britain it is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Europe is is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples. In Canada it is the conquest of the conservative protestant (aristocratic egalitarians) by the less moral peoples (the french, and now the immigrants). In Russia they are trying to prohibit the conquest of their low trust people, by even lower trust peoples. REVERSE COLONIZATION We are being colonized so that statists can free ride, and the lower classes can live off the productivity of the middle classes and prevent the middle classes from breeding in sufficient numbers to retain their economic competitiveness and their high trust norms. If colonialism was immoral then surely reverse colonialism is immoral. It is certainly genocide.
-
Why Aren't Educations Warrantied?
UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES SHOULD WARRANTY THEIR PRODUCTS, AND WE SHOULD SUE THEM FOR THE FAILURE OF THEIR PRODUCTS TO PERFORM. [T]he state gives the universities protection from suits. For selling non-performing products. (But then, the government is a monopoly that forces us to buy its services too.) Q: “Should a college education be offered to all people or to just a certain group of people?” “Should” is an interesting question. “College Education” is a loose term. “Offered” is a questionable term. The data suggest we send way too many people to college and way too few people to apprenticeship programs. Just statistically speaking, if it takes a 110-115 IQ to complete liberal arts education that means that we should be only educating `10-20% of the population and the rest should get vocational training rather than liberal arts training. Now that said, if colleges and universities had to warrantee their products, rather than sell non performing products, say, by getting x% of your payroll for 30 years, then we could drop tuition fees altogether, loans altogether, and let universities borrow to cover float (receiveables) themselves. This would rapidly change the university system from just another parasitic quasi-governmental bureaucracy, to a market driven organization. University costs and administrative costs would plummet, and courses woukd be outcome oriented. This is the best idea for solving the problem of parasitic but useless university degrees. We know now that we learn nothing at university if value. All they do is sort and filter the population.
-
Why Aren't Educations Warrantied?
UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES SHOULD WARRANTY THEIR PRODUCTS, AND WE SHOULD SUE THEM FOR THE FAILURE OF THEIR PRODUCTS TO PERFORM. [T]he state gives the universities protection from suits. For selling non-performing products. (But then, the government is a monopoly that forces us to buy its services too.) Q: “Should a college education be offered to all people or to just a certain group of people?” “Should” is an interesting question. “College Education” is a loose term. “Offered” is a questionable term. The data suggest we send way too many people to college and way too few people to apprenticeship programs. Just statistically speaking, if it takes a 110-115 IQ to complete liberal arts education that means that we should be only educating `10-20% of the population and the rest should get vocational training rather than liberal arts training. Now that said, if colleges and universities had to warrantee their products, rather than sell non performing products, say, by getting x% of your payroll for 30 years, then we could drop tuition fees altogether, loans altogether, and let universities borrow to cover float (receiveables) themselves. This would rapidly change the university system from just another parasitic quasi-governmental bureaucracy, to a market driven organization. University costs and administrative costs would plummet, and courses woukd be outcome oriented. This is the best idea for solving the problem of parasitic but useless university degrees. We know now that we learn nothing at university if value. All they do is sort and filter the population.
-
Why Aren’t Educations Warrantied?
UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES SHOULD WARRANTY THEIR PRODUCTS, AND WE SHOULD SUE THEM FOR THE FAILURE OF THEIR PRODUCTS TO PERFORM. [T]he state gives the universities protection from suits. For selling non-performing products. (But then, the government is a monopoly that forces us to buy its services too.) Q: “Should a college education be offered to all people or to just a certain group of people?” “Should” is an interesting question. “College Education” is a loose term. “Offered” is a questionable term. The data suggest we send way too many people to college and way too few people to apprenticeship programs. Just statistically speaking, if it takes a 110-115 IQ to complete liberal arts education that means that we should be only educating `10-20% of the population and the rest should get vocational training rather than liberal arts training. Now that said, if colleges and universities had to warrantee their products, rather than sell non performing products, say, by getting x% of your payroll for 30 years, then we could drop tuition fees altogether, loans altogether, and let universities borrow to cover float (receiveables) themselves. This would rapidly change the university system from just another parasitic quasi-governmental bureaucracy, to a market driven organization. University costs and administrative costs would plummet, and courses woukd be outcome oriented. This is the best idea for solving the problem of parasitic but useless university degrees. We know now that we learn nothing at university if value. All they do is sort and filter the population.
-
Why Aren’t Educations Warrantied?
UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES SHOULD WARRANTY THEIR PRODUCTS, AND WE SHOULD SUE THEM FOR THE FAILURE OF THEIR PRODUCTS TO PERFORM. [T]he state gives the universities protection from suits. For selling non-performing products. (But then, the government is a monopoly that forces us to buy its services too.) Q: “Should a college education be offered to all people or to just a certain group of people?” “Should” is an interesting question. “College Education” is a loose term. “Offered” is a questionable term. The data suggest we send way too many people to college and way too few people to apprenticeship programs. Just statistically speaking, if it takes a 110-115 IQ to complete liberal arts education that means that we should be only educating `10-20% of the population and the rest should get vocational training rather than liberal arts training. Now that said, if colleges and universities had to warrantee their products, rather than sell non performing products, say, by getting x% of your payroll for 30 years, then we could drop tuition fees altogether, loans altogether, and let universities borrow to cover float (receiveables) themselves. This would rapidly change the university system from just another parasitic quasi-governmental bureaucracy, to a market driven organization. University costs and administrative costs would plummet, and courses woukd be outcome oriented. This is the best idea for solving the problem of parasitic but useless university degrees. We know now that we learn nothing at university if value. All they do is sort and filter the population.
-
"We Must Develop Political Institutions For The People We Have, Not Those We Wish We Had"
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD” “Observation of individual men would never have led to the formulation of the static conceptions upon which the democratic edifice is founded, such as justice, equality, fraternity, order. These are based not on the traits of living men but upon schemes for the aggrandizement of mere thought-creations – “humanity”- “mankind.” Indeed the “characteristics of men” – are something to be explained away, something to be overcome in the interests of “mankind.”” – Dora Marsden
-
"We Must Develop Political Institutions For The People We Have, Not Those We Wish We Had"
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD” “Observation of individual men would never have led to the formulation of the static conceptions upon which the democratic edifice is founded, such as justice, equality, fraternity, order. These are based not on the traits of living men but upon schemes for the aggrandizement of mere thought-creations – “humanity”- “mankind.” Indeed the “characteristics of men” – are something to be explained away, something to be overcome in the interests of “mankind.”” – Dora Marsden
-
“We Must Develop Political Institutions For The People We Have, Not Those We Wish We Had”
REFORMULATION OF “WE MUST DEVELOP POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS FOR THE PEOPLE WE HAVE, NOT THOSE WE WISH WE HAD” “Observation of individual men would never have led to the formulation of the static conceptions upon which the democratic edifice is founded, such as justice, equality, fraternity, order. These are based not on the traits of living men but upon schemes for the aggrandizement of mere thought-creations – “humanity”- “mankind.” Indeed the “characteristics of men” – are something to be explained away, something to be overcome in the interests of “mankind.”” – Dora Marsden