WE ARE GOING TO GET OUR CHANCE
@RadioFreeNorthwest @NoWhiteGuilt @thegreatorder
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 23:46:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105160375500301736
WE ARE GOING TO GET OUR CHANCE
@RadioFreeNorthwest @NoWhiteGuilt @thegreatorder
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 23:46:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105160375500301736
Question: Why shouldn’t police follow zero tolerance for ignoring, disobeying, impediment, challenge, resistance, threat, aggression, flight, and just shoot first to kill? I mean, to equal the “Genetic Pacification of Europe”, we’d have to execute 0.1% ppl/year or ~900 ppl/day. Context: Right now the police kill only about 1000 people per year. To equal the Genetic Pacification of Europe from 1200-1900 they would have to kill nearly 1000 per day, every day, all year long. You know what made the west demographically superior? Manorialism and hanging. 😉
Question: Why shouldn’t police follow zero tolerance for ignoring, disobeying, impediment, challenge, resistance, threat, aggression, flight, and just shoot first to kill? I mean, to equal the “Genetic Pacification of Europe”, we’d have to execute 0.1% ppl/year or ~900 ppl/day. Context: Right now the police kill only about 1000 people per year. To equal the Genetic Pacification of Europe from 1200-1900 they would have to kill nearly 1000 per day, every day, all year long. You know what made the west demographically superior? Manorialism and hanging. 😉
Great work. Well done. Subscribed. Let us know if we can help. Make sure you cc us on what you want to be distributed.
@nof1 @WorMartiN @BHaze@Weinhagen @Nationalist7346 @ConstantineShannon
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 21:27:51 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105159830521921134
SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT: RESIDENT, CITIZEN, AND PARTICIPATORY INCENTIVES Three Markets:
And Three Classes:
Limiting participation to property-owning males having performed public service in military, emergency, or civilian corps – and extending it to their wives and children; increasing credit capacity and retirement benefits by their number of children produces optimum incentives. Creating a separate house of females as a substitute for the church may or may not constrain women’s natural hostility to capitalization vs hyperconsumption. We don’t yet know.
SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT: RESIDENT, CITIZEN, AND PARTICIPATORY INCENTIVES Three Markets:
And Three Classes:
Limiting participation to property-owning males having performed public service in military, emergency, or civilian corps – and extending it to their wives and children; increasing credit capacity and retirement benefits by their number of children produces optimum incentives. Creating a separate house of females as a substitute for the church may or may not constrain women’s natural hostility to capitalization vs hyperconsumption. We don’t yet know.
1) I won’t talk about a strategy and tactics for civil war because while part of it is obvious, the novel part of it is not. I will talk about the desirable outcome as returning to the original constitution, its imitation of the Holy Roman Empire, as independent states with a weak government. 2) And I’d beg my fellow traditionalists (constitutionalists), Romans(xians), and ‘spartans'(right) to consider we (a) convert the blue cities into ‘free cities’ (look it up), and rule, or separate and re-join the British Empire, in exchange for the reform of the Bank of England. 3) Americans are as subject to propaganda as the left is, but strategically if we did so we would effectively recreate the british empire, collapse the treasury, the federal government, the military, and ‘drive’ the ‘hostiles’ out of the core and into northeast, and southwest. 4) Combined with restoration of ‘intolerance for sedition’, the ‘good’ urbanites would flee to us. 5)This is the ‘weak-strong’ strategic objective that achieves our ambitions, because central Canada would join as well giving us a near-monopoly of food production in the world.
1) I won’t talk about a strategy and tactics for civil war because while part of it is obvious, the novel part of it is not. I will talk about the desirable outcome as returning to the original constitution, its imitation of the Holy Roman Empire, as independent states with a weak government. 2) And I’d beg my fellow traditionalists (constitutionalists), Romans(xians), and ‘spartans'(right) to consider we (a) convert the blue cities into ‘free cities’ (look it up), and rule, or separate and re-join the British Empire, in exchange for the reform of the Bank of England. 3) Americans are as subject to propaganda as the left is, but strategically if we did so we would effectively recreate the british empire, collapse the treasury, the federal government, the military, and ‘drive’ the ‘hostiles’ out of the core and into northeast, and southwest. 4) Combined with restoration of ‘intolerance for sedition’, the ‘good’ urbanites would flee to us. 5)This is the ‘weak-strong’ strategic objective that achieves our ambitions, because central Canada would join as well giving us a near-monopoly of food production in the world.
WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE ‘ENLIGHTENMENT” AND CAN HAVE IT AGAIN.
—Curt: What are your thoughts on the idea that only a strong government is secure enough to be a limited government?”—
1)The strongest government is a universal militia, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet. 2) This is what Sparta, Athens, Rome, Holy Roman, and British empires had in common before the French ‘enlightenment’ that converted strong adversarial government to weak distributed government. The French experiment failed. Strong government with strong juridical defense and democratic veto of policy by those with demonstrated competence (1-service-family, 2-service-biz/industry, service-3-governorship) is optimum government. it cannot be done better by humans, and can only be improved by computational assistance.
WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE ‘ENLIGHTENMENT” AND CAN HAVE IT AGAIN.
—Curt: What are your thoughts on the idea that only a strong government is secure enough to be a limited government?”—
1)The strongest government is a universal militia, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet. 2) This is what Sparta, Athens, Rome, Holy Roman, and British empires had in common before the French ‘enlightenment’ that converted strong adversarial government to weak distributed government. The French experiment failed. Strong government with strong juridical defense and democratic veto of policy by those with demonstrated competence (1-service-family, 2-service-biz/industry, service-3-governorship) is optimum government. it cannot be done better by humans, and can only be improved by computational assistance.