Source: Original Site Post

  • WE ARE GOING TO GET OUR CHANCE @RadioFreeNorthwest @NoWhiteGuilt @thegreatorder

    WE ARE GOING TO GET OUR CHANCE
    @RadioFreeNorthwest @NoWhiteGuilt @thegreatorder


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 23:46:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105160375500301736

  • Police should shoot a lot more people.

    Question: Why shouldn’t police follow zero tolerance for ignoring, disobeying, impediment, challenge, resistance, threat, aggression, flight, and just shoot first to kill? I mean, to equal the “Genetic Pacification of Europe”, we’d have to execute 0.1% ppl/year or ~900 ppl/day. Context: Right now the police kill only about 1000 people per year. To equal the Genetic Pacification of Europe from 1200-1900 they would have to kill nearly 1000 per day, every day, all year long. You know what made the west demographically superior? Manorialism and hanging. 😉

  • Police should shoot a lot more people.

    Question: Why shouldn’t police follow zero tolerance for ignoring, disobeying, impediment, challenge, resistance, threat, aggression, flight, and just shoot first to kill? I mean, to equal the “Genetic Pacification of Europe”, we’d have to execute 0.1% ppl/year or ~900 ppl/day. Context: Right now the police kill only about 1000 people per year. To equal the Genetic Pacification of Europe from 1200-1900 they would have to kill nearly 1000 per day, every day, all year long. You know what made the west demographically superior? Manorialism and hanging. 😉

  • Great work. Well done. Subscribed. Let us know if we can help. Make sure you cc

    Great work. Well done. Subscribed. Let us know if we can help. Make sure you cc us on what you want to be distributed.

    @nof1 @WorMartiN @BHaze@Weinhagen @Nationalist7346 @ConstantineShannon


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-05 21:27:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105159830521921134

  • Scientific Government: Resident, Citizen, and Participatory Incentives

    SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT: RESIDENT, CITIZEN, AND PARTICIPATORY INCENTIVES Three Markets:

    • Via negativa market for juridical DEFENSE,
    • via reciproca markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (marriage), production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services (TRADE), and
    • via positiva markets for the production of commons (OFFENSE)

    And Three Classes:

    • All People require civil(private) juridical defense.
    • All Residents require institutional (govt) juridical defense.
    • All Citizens who have demonstrated competence and contribution to the commons may have access to political force(participation) by their achievements, creating Houses of the Classes as a market for the production of commons.

    Limiting participation to property-owning males having performed public service in military, emergency, or civilian corps – and extending it to their wives and children; increasing credit capacity and retirement benefits by their number of children produces optimum incentives. Creating a separate house of females as a substitute for the church may or may not constrain women’s natural hostility to capitalization vs hyperconsumption. We don’t yet know.

  • Scientific Government: Resident, Citizen, and Participatory Incentives

    SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT: RESIDENT, CITIZEN, AND PARTICIPATORY INCENTIVES Three Markets:

    • Via negativa market for juridical DEFENSE,
    • via reciproca markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (marriage), production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services (TRADE), and
    • via positiva markets for the production of commons (OFFENSE)

    And Three Classes:

    • All People require civil(private) juridical defense.
    • All Residents require institutional (govt) juridical defense.
    • All Citizens who have demonstrated competence and contribution to the commons may have access to political force(participation) by their achievements, creating Houses of the Classes as a market for the production of commons.

    Limiting participation to property-owning males having performed public service in military, emergency, or civilian corps – and extending it to their wives and children; increasing credit capacity and retirement benefits by their number of children produces optimum incentives. Creating a separate house of females as a substitute for the church may or may not constrain women’s natural hostility to capitalization vs hyperconsumption. We don’t yet know.

  • Strategic Objectives for Civil War

    1) I won’t talk about a strategy and tactics for civil war because while part of it is obvious, the novel part of it is not. I will talk about the desirable outcome as returning to the original constitution, its imitation of the Holy Roman Empire, as independent states with a weak government. 2) And I’d beg my fellow traditionalists (constitutionalists), Romans(xians), and ‘spartans'(right) to consider we (a) convert the blue cities into ‘free cities’ (look it up), and rule, or separate and re-join the British Empire, in exchange for the reform of the Bank of England. 3) Americans are as subject to propaganda as the left is, but strategically if we did so we would effectively recreate the british empire, collapse the treasury, the federal government, the military, and ‘drive’ the ‘hostiles’ out of the core and into northeast, and southwest. 4) Combined with restoration of ‘intolerance for sedition’, the ‘good’ urbanites would flee to us. 5)This is the ‘weak-strong’ strategic objective that achieves our ambitions, because central Canada would join as well giving us a near-monopoly of food production in the world.

  • Strategic Objectives for Civil War

    1) I won’t talk about a strategy and tactics for civil war because while part of it is obvious, the novel part of it is not. I will talk about the desirable outcome as returning to the original constitution, its imitation of the Holy Roman Empire, as independent states with a weak government. 2) And I’d beg my fellow traditionalists (constitutionalists), Romans(xians), and ‘spartans'(right) to consider we (a) convert the blue cities into ‘free cities’ (look it up), and rule, or separate and re-join the British Empire, in exchange for the reform of the Bank of England. 3) Americans are as subject to propaganda as the left is, but strategically if we did so we would effectively recreate the british empire, collapse the treasury, the federal government, the military, and ‘drive’ the ‘hostiles’ out of the core and into northeast, and southwest. 4) Combined with restoration of ‘intolerance for sedition’, the ‘good’ urbanites would flee to us. 5)This is the ‘weak-strong’ strategic objective that achieves our ambitions, because central Canada would join as well giving us a near-monopoly of food production in the world.

  • We Had Perfect Government Before the ‘Enlightenment” and Can Have It Again.

    WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE ‘ENLIGHTENMENT” AND CAN HAVE IT AGAIN.

    —Curt: What are your thoughts on the idea that only a strong government is secure enough to be a limited government?”—

      1)The strongest government is a universal militia, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet. 2) This is what Sparta, Athens, Rome, Holy Roman, and British empires had in common before the French ‘enlightenment’ that converted strong adversarial government to weak distributed government. The French experiment failed. Strong government with strong juridical defense and democratic veto of policy by those with demonstrated competence (1-service-family, 2-service-biz/industry, service-3-governorship) is optimum government. it cannot be done better by humans, and can only be improved by computational assistance.

  • We Had Perfect Government Before the ‘Enlightenment” and Can Have It Again.

    WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE ‘ENLIGHTENMENT” AND CAN HAVE IT AGAIN.

    —Curt: What are your thoughts on the idea that only a strong government is secure enough to be a limited government?”—

      1)The strongest government is a universal militia, rule of law of self-determination by sovereignty and reciprocity, defended by judiciary, using monarchy as judge of last resort, a professional cabinet, and houses for the classes as jury for proposals put forth by the cabinet. 2) This is what Sparta, Athens, Rome, Holy Roman, and British empires had in common before the French ‘enlightenment’ that converted strong adversarial government to weak distributed government. The French experiment failed. Strong government with strong juridical defense and democratic veto of policy by those with demonstrated competence (1-service-family, 2-service-biz/industry, service-3-governorship) is optimum government. it cannot be done better by humans, and can only be improved by computational assistance.