Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • What Is Peak Capitalism?

    A leftist dogma. A new name for regurgitated Marx.  And just as fallacious as his. 

    The entire world has adopted capitalism.  Because innovation, adaptation, production, distribution and trade are not possible without it. 

    The current argument is that low trust, traditional-family, and tribal-family  polities, particularly those that practice cousin-marriage, cannot operate without a dominant state, and that high trust, absolute nuclear families are uniquely able to operate without a dominant state – relying entirely on common law.  And that the unique circumstances that allowed northern europeans to develop the high trust society cannot be repeated without returning to manorial era suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses.  And certainly cannot survive the immigration of new castes of underclasses. 

    So when we refer to peak capitalism we refer to the expansion of the world’s low trust demographic distribution evolving into the majority – both in absolute numbers, and in aggregate economic and political influence.

    Capitalist meritocracy is only tolerable to the upper classes.  When europeans were the worlds dominant upper class, others tried to imitate it. Now that we have been displaced through reproduction and immigration, that meritocracy is no longer advantageous to the remainder of the planet.

    That is the most honest, probably most scientific, and most probably answer to the question.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-peak-capitalism

  • Do Americans Wear Outdoor-shoes Inside Their Homes As Portrayed In Tellies/movies? Don’t They Maintain Indoor Slippers/shoes Like Asians Or Others?

    Suburban America is an incredibly CLEAN place to live.  Especially because many people drive a LOT and walk very little.  So,  for many Americans, depending upon where you live, it can be seen as ‘village’ behavior – meaning that you’re used to being dirty. Or City behavior (meaning the same). And it can be pretentious (or insulting) to ask guests to remove their shoes.   Within the past few decades its become fashionable to keep house shoes inside, and separate shoes outside.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-Americans-wear-outdoor-shoes-inside-their-homes-as-portrayed-in-tellies-movies-Don’t-they-maintain-indoor-slippers-shoes-like-Asians-or-others

  • Could Feudalism Be Recreated As A System More Beneficial To The Working Classes Than Capitalism?

    We may be wealthier in all respects, but there is little difference between mandatory labor and mandatory taxation.  Mandatory taxation is more efficient than mandatory labor.  The Feudal holding today (USA) may be larger than the feudal holding in the medieval era, but just try to leave America for another country and see what the government does to you.

    https://www.quora.com/Could-feudalism-be-recreated-as-a-system-more-beneficial-to-the-working-classes-than-capitalism

  • Do Americans Wear Outdoor-shoes Inside Their Homes As Portrayed In Tellies/movies? Don’t They Maintain Indoor Slippers/shoes Like Asians Or Others?

    Suburban America is an incredibly CLEAN place to live.  Especially because many people drive a LOT and walk very little.  So,  for many Americans, depending upon where you live, it can be seen as ‘village’ behavior – meaning that you’re used to being dirty. Or City behavior (meaning the same). And it can be pretentious (or insulting) to ask guests to remove their shoes.   Within the past few decades its become fashionable to keep house shoes inside, and separate shoes outside.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-Americans-wear-outdoor-shoes-inside-their-homes-as-portrayed-in-tellies-movies-Don’t-they-maintain-indoor-slippers-shoes-like-Asians-or-others

  • Could Feudalism Be Recreated As A System More Beneficial To The Working Classes Than Capitalism?

    We may be wealthier in all respects, but there is little difference between mandatory labor and mandatory taxation.  Mandatory taxation is more efficient than mandatory labor.  The Feudal holding today (USA) may be larger than the feudal holding in the medieval era, but just try to leave America for another country and see what the government does to you.

    https://www.quora.com/Could-feudalism-be-recreated-as-a-system-more-beneficial-to-the-working-classes-than-capitalism

  • The Mirror View of Feminism: The Destruction of the Compromise

    [A]nd women have successfully voted to destroy western property rights in every election after the first generation of women voters. Today almost all elections are decided by women, and principally by unmarried women and single mothers (see Pew).

    Without women voters we would never have moved to the left, destroyed the constitution, destroyed the family (the compromise), and had rampant immigration.

    Until we developed paternalism, women used sex to manage extended families. Men developed property, and paternalism, and instead of a few men reproducing, many did. All advancement in human history is the product of property rights – and women have destroyed them. And destroyed the west.

    So the future looks very much like the conquest of the west, and the return to greco-islamic paternalism. Why? Because women used democracy to violate the compromise that made western civilization possible.

    For men, it is much more desirable to live in a paternal world. It is easy for us to dominate women. We don’t make civilization for ourselves, but for the admiration of our women, wives and daughters.

    The only choice women have ever had was the one western men gave them. And they destroyed it with their folly and greed.

    Women gossip. Women destroy each other through hen-pecking in groups. Women destroy advanced society. It’s not complicated. It’s in their nature.

    Through most of history, women (gossips) were considered the root of all evil. It appears that even in advanced society, history repeats itself.

    We made a mistake deifying women in the victorian era.

    We were right all along.

  • The Mirror View of Feminism: The Destruction of the Compromise

    [A]nd women have successfully voted to destroy western property rights in every election after the first generation of women voters. Today almost all elections are decided by women, and principally by unmarried women and single mothers (see Pew).

    Without women voters we would never have moved to the left, destroyed the constitution, destroyed the family (the compromise), and had rampant immigration.

    Until we developed paternalism, women used sex to manage extended families. Men developed property, and paternalism, and instead of a few men reproducing, many did. All advancement in human history is the product of property rights – and women have destroyed them. And destroyed the west.

    So the future looks very much like the conquest of the west, and the return to greco-islamic paternalism. Why? Because women used democracy to violate the compromise that made western civilization possible.

    For men, it is much more desirable to live in a paternal world. It is easy for us to dominate women. We don’t make civilization for ourselves, but for the admiration of our women, wives and daughters.

    The only choice women have ever had was the one western men gave them. And they destroyed it with their folly and greed.

    Women gossip. Women destroy each other through hen-pecking in groups. Women destroy advanced society. It’s not complicated. It’s in their nature.

    Through most of history, women (gossips) were considered the root of all evil. It appears that even in advanced society, history repeats itself.

    We made a mistake deifying women in the victorian era.

    We were right all along.

  • Feminists: Be Careful What You Wish For

    [T]he first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.
    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • Feminists: Be Careful What You Wish For

    [T]he first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.
    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • Does The United States Subtly Prevent Canada From Becoming More Powerful?

    Contrary to Canadian religious practice of self-congratulation, Canada is not powerful. It is merely wealthy.  And it is wealthy because it benefits from the following accidents:
    1) a border with an empire nearly unequalled in human history. Oceans on all other borders.
    2) enormous natural resources it does not need to defend, build a culture of defense, or spend upon defense, because of that empire.
    3) Genocide of the indigenous population leaving a vast territory that can be sold off to immigrants.
    4) a heritage in the common law, and anglo civilization, allowing for high trust and vast credit expansion.
    5) The ability to act as the ‘princess’ in all business dealings, since as a virtual island protected by an empire, selling off its resources to third parties, Canadians can obtain privilege from virtue of never having to use a stick in the world, and always using a carrot. 
    6) Had the states not paid 20M for Alaska, and with Russia on its flank, Canada might have a very different view of world affairs.
    7) Without the left-wing vote supplied by the Quebecois, (who are a lower class catholic population) the anglos (a middle class protestant population) the end result of the vote would be that Canada votes as conservatively as does the american midwest.
    It is what it is.  Canada is the MOST PRIVILEGED country on earth.  Not because of choice, but because of circumstance.  Choosing benevolence from circumstance isn’t demonstration of virtue. It’s demonstration of accident.

    https://www.quora.com/Does-the-United-States-subtly-prevent-Canada-from-becoming-more-powerful