Eric Weinstein : [Wait for a new generation of non-war era politicians]. I think you mean, a new generation of politicians, who were sold the globalist postwar pseudoscience(religion): the anti-Darwinian revolution’s denial of the physical(scarcity), natural(reciprocity, amorality), evolutionary(ethnocentrism, isolation vs hybridization, regression, dysgenics) laws. 😉 Eric is still hyping the left’s pseudoscientific revolution against the natural eugenics of western and far eastern civilizations under the pretense of ‘doing good’, when it’s just the female instinct to undermine males to cause them to convert get resources: Talking Monkeys. Aping memes they don’t comprehend.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Eric Weinstein doing it again. sigh. So much promise but so much fail.
Eric Weinstein : [Wait for a new generation of non-war era politicians]. I think you mean, a new generation of politicians, who were sold the globalist postwar pseudoscience(religion): the anti-Darwinian revolution’s denial of the physical(scarcity), natural(reciprocity, amorality), evolutionary(ethnocentrism, isolation vs hybridization, regression, dysgenics) laws. 😉 Eric is still hyping the left’s pseudoscientific revolution against the natural eugenics of western and far eastern civilizations under the pretense of ‘doing good’, when it’s just the female instinct to undermine males to cause them to convert get resources: Talking Monkeys. Aping memes they don’t comprehend.
-
Three Quotables
1) Priests deceive, philosophers persuade, ideologists sell, scientists describe, the judges decide, the military commands , and the legislature lies – the worst possible replacement for rule of law by natural law, monarchy, cabinet, and “thang” (jury). Politics is organized crime.
2) Norway: Female political fringe demands expand infinitely because their political preferences are just extensions of instinct for hyperconsumption of safety, virtue feelings, and virtue signals to others. That it’s unlimited is the evidence there is no reasoning behind it.
3) Economics: the study of income vs balance sheets expenditures of time. if you don’t measure capital, in particular institutional capital, then you will fool yourself that spending down accumulating savings of the past two thousand years is income. More on Brookings for their reputation of economic pseudoscience: density decreases opportunity costs, producing on average a 15% gain in consumption per doubling at the cost of crime, corruption, and dysgenia, with all capital increase to bureaucracy, rental and finance sectors.
-
Three Quotables
1) Priests deceive, philosophers persuade, ideologists sell, scientists describe, the judges decide, the military commands , and the legislature lies – the worst possible replacement for rule of law by natural law, monarchy, cabinet, and “thang” (jury). Politics is organized crime.
2) Norway: Female political fringe demands expand infinitely because their political preferences are just extensions of instinct for hyperconsumption of safety, virtue feelings, and virtue signals to others. That it’s unlimited is the evidence there is no reasoning behind it.
3) Economics: the study of income vs balance sheets expenditures of time. if you don’t measure capital, in particular institutional capital, then you will fool yourself that spending down accumulating savings of the past two thousand years is income. More on Brookings for their reputation of economic pseudoscience: density decreases opportunity costs, producing on average a 15% gain in consumption per doubling at the cost of crime, corruption, and dysgenia, with all capital increase to bureaucracy, rental and finance sectors.
-
Yes My Adventure In Populism Was Harmful To The Distribution of the Work
Thanks. Yes, I know I hurt my work completing the scientific method, language, psychology, sociology, and natural law by trying to help the ‘populist’ movement to ‘restore our rule of law’. I felt it was a moral obligation. But my serious work will last for millennia. It’s ok. 😉
—“It still boggles my mind that other than Joscha Bach, still nobody have come to terms with the core message of your project”— Friend
Most would benefit from following Joscha Bach and if you have patience, Jeff Hawkins. If you follow the three of us -we’re the future. Time will do it’s work.
-
Yes My Adventure In Populism Was Harmful To The Distribution of the Work
Thanks. Yes, I know I hurt my work completing the scientific method, language, psychology, sociology, and natural law by trying to help the ‘populist’ movement to ‘restore our rule of law’. I felt it was a moral obligation. But my serious work will last for millennia. It’s ok. 😉
—“It still boggles my mind that other than Joscha Bach, still nobody have come to terms with the core message of your project”— Friend
Most would benefit from following Joscha Bach and if you have patience, Jeff Hawkins. If you follow the three of us -we’re the future. Time will do it’s work.
-
China: Staying On Message – learn.
China proved fascism: intolerant, ethnocentric, state capitalism – won the political battle of the industrial age. The face-before-truth that the party practices top down instead of continuously educating the polity, and generating at least local rule of positive law they need. China is a leftist practicing leftist techniques. They are, like women, very authoritarian, very socially constructive, very shame sensitive, and they are just playing snide tit for tat over our criticism of suppression of Abrahamic religions, and ‘human rights’, and corruption. As I’ve said elsewhere, aside from trying to become a world military power that hurts their long term strategy, they do almost everything right – except lie all the time to save face, instead of saturating the environment with truth and the truth of how hard the party works.
-
China: Staying On Message – learn.
China proved fascism: intolerant, ethnocentric, state capitalism – won the political battle of the industrial age. The face-before-truth that the party practices top down instead of continuously educating the polity, and generating at least local rule of positive law they need. China is a leftist practicing leftist techniques. They are, like women, very authoritarian, very socially constructive, very shame sensitive, and they are just playing snide tit for tat over our criticism of suppression of Abrahamic religions, and ‘human rights’, and corruption. As I’ve said elsewhere, aside from trying to become a world military power that hurts their long term strategy, they do almost everything right – except lie all the time to save face, instead of saturating the environment with truth and the truth of how hard the party works.
-
It’s Rewarding. Understanding is rewarding.
P-Law is the formal logic of the behavioral sciences: language, psychology, sociology, economics, ethics, law, politics, and group strategies. It’s NOT EASY. It’s behavioral economics and law at once. But it is the MOST relevant and rewarding intellectual investment you can make.
-
It’s Rewarding. Understanding is rewarding.
P-Law is the formal logic of the behavioral sciences: language, psychology, sociology, economics, ethics, law, politics, and group strategies. It’s NOT EASY. It’s behavioral economics and law at once. But it is the MOST relevant and rewarding intellectual investment you can make.