Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Law: Genetic Pacification: The Problem of Retaliation.

    [I] think that anyone with knowledge of the intellectual history of law is keenly aware of the church’s problem of breaking up the large family holdings, and the law’s problem of preventing retaliation.

    What I think has proven difficult for most people in the conservative and certainly in the libertarian movements, is the recognition that property rights must extend to cover all those impositions that invoke retaliation.

    —-“Frost and Harpending argue that Human nature has been domesticated through breeding out violent men by the state. HBD chick & Jayman are arguing that the state replaced clan violence and directed it toward its enemies. It‘s really a question of whether cooperation with strangers on a mass scale occurred before or after the rise of the state. They agree on most things, “Yes, I see the two processes as being complementary. The dissolution of clannishness was both a cause and an effect of the pacification of social relations.”—-Bret Lynn

    (See http://www.europeanguardian.com/82-uncategorised/science/4-western-europe-state-formation-and-genetic-pacification)

    While we consider the central problem the state, the state is the result of suppressing private impositions while preserving political rents to pay for that suppression.

    But the central problem we face if we wish to reduce or eliminate the interference and rent seeking of the state, is to eliminate by way of the common law, using positive assertion of property rights, all actions that produce rents, whether in public or private life.

    First we centralize rents to suppress local rents and increase local productivity.  Next we eliminate rents in order to suppress political parasitism endemic to all monopoly and all monopoly bureaucracy.

  • Yes, You Can Use Violence To Create Peace

    —“You can’t bomb people into peace”— [A]rguably false. The great ‘peaces’ have all been the result of those empires possessing and exercising disproportionate power over trade routes, and in doing so creating single commercial zones, so that all competition is forced into the market for goods and services, and all political and military competition is suppressed. So the evidence is quite the contrary: you absolutely can bomb into peace. No question about it. In fact, bombing into peace is the standard by which such things are accomplished. The question is not the bombs, but whether one chooses to rule or exploit those one has bombed. If one chooses to rule, and rules by rule of law, then who GOVERNS is something quite different. Most polities will tolerate rule if they can continue governance (discretionary production of commons). It is not the provision of commons (government) that challenges less advanced people, but the adjudication of differences by objective means.

    Aristocracy’s function is to rule, not necessarily to govern. We prohibit violence and theft, prohibit error, bias, wishful thinking and deceit., and adjudicate differences. We do not favor much else other than beauty. Aristocracy uses limits. Hypotheses we leave to others.

  • Yes, You Can Use Violence To Create Peace

    —“You can’t bomb people into peace”— [A]rguably false. The great ‘peaces’ have all been the result of those empires possessing and exercising disproportionate power over trade routes, and in doing so creating single commercial zones, so that all competition is forced into the market for goods and services, and all political and military competition is suppressed. So the evidence is quite the contrary: you absolutely can bomb into peace. No question about it. In fact, bombing into peace is the standard by which such things are accomplished. The question is not the bombs, but whether one chooses to rule or exploit those one has bombed. If one chooses to rule, and rules by rule of law, then who GOVERNS is something quite different. Most polities will tolerate rule if they can continue governance (discretionary production of commons). It is not the provision of commons (government) that challenges less advanced people, but the adjudication of differences by objective means.

    Aristocracy’s function is to rule, not necessarily to govern. We prohibit violence and theft, prohibit error, bias, wishful thinking and deceit., and adjudicate differences. We do not favor much else other than beauty. Aristocracy uses limits. Hypotheses we leave to others.

  • Aristocracy (Advocacy), Not Racism (Criticism)

    [R]ace debate is not helpful to anyone. Aristocracy is. Culling your herd (tribe) will produce a universal aristocracy regardless of race. We, the Chinese and the European Jews have been the best at culling our herds. The other civilizations simply haven’t been successful at culling their tribes. I don’t see differences in races of homo-sapiens other than reproductive value, and distribution of talents. And the distribution of talents is a function of thefailure to suppress the lower classes from reproducing.

    That’s it. I don’t care about the color of your skin so much as I care about the distribution of talents in your family. You are either successful at improving your family or you are not. If you are not then your aristocracy is a failure. The alternative is just to breed as many of the worst as possible and use the export of your bad genes as a weapon. Which is what the muslim world is doing.

  • Aristocracy (Advocacy), Not Racism (Criticism)

    [R]ace debate is not helpful to anyone. Aristocracy is. Culling your herd (tribe) will produce a universal aristocracy regardless of race. We, the Chinese and the European Jews have been the best at culling our herds. The other civilizations simply haven’t been successful at culling their tribes. I don’t see differences in races of homo-sapiens other than reproductive value, and distribution of talents. And the distribution of talents is a function of thefailure to suppress the lower classes from reproducing.

    That’s it. I don’t care about the color of your skin so much as I care about the distribution of talents in your family. You are either successful at improving your family or you are not. If you are not then your aristocracy is a failure. The alternative is just to breed as many of the worst as possible and use the export of your bad genes as a weapon. Which is what the muslim world is doing.

  • Revolution: Threats by Which We Raise The Cost of the Status Quo

    [R]EVOLUTION: THE  THREAT: THE PROMISE: “THE BURNINGS”The Burnings: (a) the advocates of lying, deceit, and pseudoscience (people: public intellectuals) (b) the executors of lying, deceit, pseudoscience (bureaucrats) (b) the institutions of pseudoscience (academy, bureaucracy, media) (c) the works of pseudoscience (Freudianism, marxism, Keynesianism, postmodernism) (d) the advertising of ugliness, deceit, and pseudoscience (modern and postmodern art)

    Burn the “Cathedral Complex” to ashes. It’s not just statues of Lenin and Stalin that need to be destroyed. It’s statues to lying, deceit, and pseudoscience: all the works of the “era of deceit” – the Pseudoscientific and postmodern period. That is how it is done. Crucifying, Impaling, Guillotining, Hanging, Breaking, and Burning. It’s a very clear, informationally dense message. The Albigensian solution: Eradicate the lies as the Egyptians eradicated monotheism, and as the Christians eradicated stoicism and polytheism; and as the church eradicated the Albigensians, and as the Marxists and socialists eradicated truth, goodness and beauty. End the tyranny of lies.  Restore the Truthful Civilization: The Civic Society. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Revolution: Threats by Which We Raise The Cost of the Status Quo

    [R]EVOLUTION: THE  THREAT: THE PROMISE: “THE BURNINGS”The Burnings: (a) the advocates of lying, deceit, and pseudoscience (people: public intellectuals) (b) the executors of lying, deceit, pseudoscience (bureaucrats) (b) the institutions of pseudoscience (academy, bureaucracy, media) (c) the works of pseudoscience (Freudianism, marxism, Keynesianism, postmodernism) (d) the advertising of ugliness, deceit, and pseudoscience (modern and postmodern art)

    Burn the “Cathedral Complex” to ashes. It’s not just statues of Lenin and Stalin that need to be destroyed. It’s statues to lying, deceit, and pseudoscience: all the works of the “era of deceit” – the Pseudoscientific and postmodern period. That is how it is done. Crucifying, Impaling, Guillotining, Hanging, Breaking, and Burning. It’s a very clear, informationally dense message. The Albigensian solution: Eradicate the lies as the Egyptians eradicated monotheism, and as the Christians eradicated stoicism and polytheism; and as the church eradicated the Albigensians, and as the Marxists and socialists eradicated truth, goodness and beauty. End the tyranny of lies.  Restore the Truthful Civilization: The Civic Society. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Can The New Testament be Our Old Testament, and Can We Create a Western Testament?

    [C]hristianity: the gradual expiration of impulsive hatred and its replacement with rational justice. Q&A: “What if the New Testament was our Old Testament and the ‘New’ the Western ethical cannon?” THE REFORMATION [C]hristianity: the gradual expiration of impulsive hatred and its replacement with rational justice.    Jesus=Love.  MAN – God (Truth). – Gods (perfection in individual virtues). – Those humans who were godlike (demonstrated perfection in life). – Those humans who worked to be godlike. (but whose names we do not always remember) – Those humans who refrained from being ungodly. – Those humans who were ungodly. – And those humans who were evil. GODS – Center: God (perfection), Man, Woman, Family, Earth. (Family + earth) – North: Justice: Truth, Law, Justice, War. (Masculine) – East: Commons: Contract, Production, Distribution, Trade – West: Art:  Invention, Knowledge, Craft, Art – South: Love:  Caretaking, Nurture, Charity (Feminine), Teaching NOT ONE BUT MANY – Monotheism is the folly of conformity to tyranny: that we must be identical slaves, rather than specialists who participate in a division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy and inform one another through voluntary cooperation. – Pick your saint and seek to live as your saint. – The religion of specialists for an economy of specialists in a heterogeneous polity. LOVE, JUSTICE(TRUTH), COMMONS, ARTS – Christianity is reducible to the extension of kinship love to non-kin, for the purpose of producing commons and prohibiting conflicts. – Justice is reducible to the prohibition of, and restitution for, parasitism. – Commons are reducible to that what we agree not to privatize. – The first commons is the voluntary organization of production is made possible by justice. – Prosperity is made possible by the voluntary organization of production. – Production is made possible by specialization in the multitude of arts.

  • Can The New Testament be Our Old Testament, and Can We Create a Western Testament?

    [C]hristianity: the gradual expiration of impulsive hatred and its replacement with rational justice. Q&A: “What if the New Testament was our Old Testament and the ‘New’ the Western ethical cannon?” THE REFORMATION [C]hristianity: the gradual expiration of impulsive hatred and its replacement with rational justice.    Jesus=Love.  MAN – God (Truth). – Gods (perfection in individual virtues). – Those humans who were godlike (demonstrated perfection in life). – Those humans who worked to be godlike. (but whose names we do not always remember) – Those humans who refrained from being ungodly. – Those humans who were ungodly. – And those humans who were evil. GODS – Center: God (perfection), Man, Woman, Family, Earth. (Family + earth) – North: Justice: Truth, Law, Justice, War. (Masculine) – East: Commons: Contract, Production, Distribution, Trade – West: Art:  Invention, Knowledge, Craft, Art – South: Love:  Caretaking, Nurture, Charity (Feminine), Teaching NOT ONE BUT MANY – Monotheism is the folly of conformity to tyranny: that we must be identical slaves, rather than specialists who participate in a division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy and inform one another through voluntary cooperation. – Pick your saint and seek to live as your saint. – The religion of specialists for an economy of specialists in a heterogeneous polity. LOVE, JUSTICE(TRUTH), COMMONS, ARTS – Christianity is reducible to the extension of kinship love to non-kin, for the purpose of producing commons and prohibiting conflicts. – Justice is reducible to the prohibition of, and restitution for, parasitism. – Commons are reducible to that what we agree not to privatize. – The first commons is the voluntary organization of production is made possible by justice. – Prosperity is made possible by the voluntary organization of production. – Production is made possible by specialization in the multitude of arts.

  • Q&A: Revolution. Will it Result in the ‘Right’ People?

    (worth repeating)QUESTION:

    —“How do we demand a return to an Aristocracy of the right people? This is a steep hill we’re climbing.”—

    ANSWER: [T]he right people are impossible to know. And even such, it’s not a matter of choosing the right people. It’s a matter of preventing all the WRONG people. And preventing the wrong people is something that we can do. Prosecute the bad, and only the good remain. Determine the false, and only true remains. Fragility is easy to exploit into a cascade. It was one thing to promise democracy when there was no empirical evidence. But the evidence is in. It’s genocidal. Mostly because women lacked the experience and accountability for the votes that they cast. We got what the majority of women and the minority of men desired: largely by destroying the family and expanding immigration, and transferring reproduction from the middle to the lower classes through aggressive taxation. The problem for creating momentum in any revolution is that people need an alternative institutional framework to accept, if not advocate, that will solve present problems and provide them with a means of understanding how the future might unfold. So, we need something for them to demand. Just as the founding fathers did. Just as all enlightenment movements did. And it must take a moral high ground. After that, there are 3 hours of energy, 3 days of water, 6 days of food in the channel, and an economy that cannot tolerate shocks. Long gone are the days where the multitudes must take to the streets with pitchforks. A small number of men with a few pages of instructions can do far more damage than the communist insurgents did. A sustained but short period of unpredictability and a positive set of demands will collapse the channels, and the government with it. All governance is an illusion created by the accumulated momentum of common interests. It is a fragile illusion easily dispelled, which is why governors are so paranoid about the slightest threat. It’s easy, with just a few thousand. With 1% it’s all but certain. We have more than 1% if we give them actionable direction. (Look at the middle east.)