(worth repeating)
[H]IERARCHY OF ETHICAL LOGICS
1) Pedagogical Myths...(very young)..........Stories
2) Virtue Ethics.......(young)...............Biographies
3) Rule Ethics.........(inexperience adult)..Laws
4) Outcome Ethics......(experienced adult)...Science
Source: Original Site Post
-
Hierarchy Of Ethical Logics
-
Lying: Methods and Techniques .. Plus A Reading List
(important) (first draft) (this ought to make some people think) [W]hat I am struck by when researching this topic, is how primitive the research is into HOW lies are constructed. Here are the Axis I am working with: So sticking with the general rules that:
6) One can speak to:
5) One can convey :
7) One can speak using: -construction-
8) One can speak with:
9) One can construct speech out of: -axis-
10) One can engage in discovery by: -discovery-
10a) one can engage rallying by: -Rallying-
11) One can employ arguments using (true or false) :
CATEGORIES OF LIES? —“Nanavati classifies lies into the following categories:”–
READING LIST Dallas Denery: The Devil Wins: A History of Lying from the Garden of Eden to the Enlightenment Thomas Carson: Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice Jennifer Mather Saul: Lying, Misleading, and What is Said Clancy Martin: The Philosophy of Deception Herbert Fingarette: Self-Deception Brooke Harrington: Deception: From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating Edward Bernays: Propaganda Jason Stanley: How Propaganda Works Hardcover Jeremy Elkins: Truth and Democracy David Livingstone: Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others Daniel Nanavati: A Brief History Of Lies
-
Lying: Methods and Techniques .. Plus A Reading List
(important) (first draft) (this ought to make some people think) [W]hat I am struck by when researching this topic, is how primitive the research is into HOW lies are constructed. Here are the Axis I am working with: So sticking with the general rules that:
6) One can speak to:
5) One can convey :
7) One can speak using: -construction-
8) One can speak with:
9) One can construct speech out of: -axis-
10) One can engage in discovery by: -discovery-
10a) one can engage rallying by: -Rallying-
11) One can employ arguments using (true or false) :
CATEGORIES OF LIES? —“Nanavati classifies lies into the following categories:”–
READING LIST Dallas Denery: The Devil Wins: A History of Lying from the Garden of Eden to the Enlightenment Thomas Carson: Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice Jennifer Mather Saul: Lying, Misleading, and What is Said Clancy Martin: The Philosophy of Deception Herbert Fingarette: Self-Deception Brooke Harrington: Deception: From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating Edward Bernays: Propaganda Jason Stanley: How Propaganda Works Hardcover Jeremy Elkins: Truth and Democracy David Livingstone: Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others Daniel Nanavati: A Brief History Of Lies
-
How Do We Identify The Commons?
[I]nformation, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norms, Traditions, Myths – people DEMONSTRATE that they treat these as commons: “that which may not be consumed”. That is what constitutes property-en-toto: that which man has paid costs (of any kind) to acquire and inventory.
-
How Do We Identify The Commons?
[I]nformation, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norms, Traditions, Myths – people DEMONSTRATE that they treat these as commons: “that which may not be consumed”. That is what constitutes property-en-toto: that which man has paid costs (of any kind) to acquire and inventory.
-
Explained: The Libertine Fallacy Of Crusoe’s Island Thought Model
“[T]he Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island, Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that surrounds and defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the European nobles and knights. It represents the eastern European territories defended by the Tsars, the Polish-Lithuanian Armies, and the Austro Hungarians. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. The thought model for the evolution of cooperation is the endless grassland of the Pontic steppe, evenly distributed with competitors, who must construct the mutual insurance of property and commons through the organized force of arms – denying that territory, capital and property to others. The Crusoe’s island thought model is not only a fallacy, but also a deception that seeks to justify the non-payment for the defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital, and property from competitors. Jewish Enlightenment Cosmopolitanism in socialist, Libertine libertarianism, and neo-conservatives forms, is an even worse failure than Anglo enlightenment liberalism’s social democracy and political correctness. Because like all of Jewish history, underinvestment in institutions of defense and commons by a migratory pastoral people means they engage in the privatization of costs that should have gone to defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital and property – and the export of cost of defense onto host warriors, who eventually tire of carrying free-riders. There is no free ride. The history of civilization is reducible to the incremental suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation, by the incremental evolution of institutions, laws, traditions, and norms, which suppress it.” —Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute
-
Explained: The Libertine Fallacy Of Crusoe’s Island Thought Model
“[T]he Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island, Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that surrounds and defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the European nobles and knights. It represents the eastern European territories defended by the Tsars, the Polish-Lithuanian Armies, and the Austro Hungarians. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. The thought model for the evolution of cooperation is the endless grassland of the Pontic steppe, evenly distributed with competitors, who must construct the mutual insurance of property and commons through the organized force of arms – denying that territory, capital and property to others. The Crusoe’s island thought model is not only a fallacy, but also a deception that seeks to justify the non-payment for the defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital, and property from competitors. Jewish Enlightenment Cosmopolitanism in socialist, Libertine libertarianism, and neo-conservatives forms, is an even worse failure than Anglo enlightenment liberalism’s social democracy and political correctness. Because like all of Jewish history, underinvestment in institutions of defense and commons by a migratory pastoral people means they engage in the privatization of costs that should have gone to defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital and property – and the export of cost of defense onto host warriors, who eventually tire of carrying free-riders. There is no free ride. The history of civilization is reducible to the incremental suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation, by the incremental evolution of institutions, laws, traditions, and norms, which suppress it.” —Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute
-
Plutarch Supports : The Only Things That Melt In This Pot …
THE ONLY THINGS THAT MELT IN THIS POT, ARE RULE OF LAW, HIGH TRUST, THE COMMONS, AND THE VOLUNTARISM OF THE CIVIC SOCIETY
—-“For along with strange people, strange doctrines must come in; and novel doctrines bring novel decisions, from which there must arise many feelings and resolutions which destroy the harmony of the existing political order. Therefore he thought it more necessary to keep bad manners and customs from invading and filling the city than it was to keep out infectious diseases.”—Plutarch
ALSO READ Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nations IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own http://www.amazon.com/Hive-Mind-Your-Nation%C2…/…/0804785961
-
Plutarch Supports : The Only Things That Melt In This Pot …
THE ONLY THINGS THAT MELT IN THIS POT, ARE RULE OF LAW, HIGH TRUST, THE COMMONS, AND THE VOLUNTARISM OF THE CIVIC SOCIETY
—-“For along with strange people, strange doctrines must come in; and novel doctrines bring novel decisions, from which there must arise many feelings and resolutions which destroy the harmony of the existing political order. Therefore he thought it more necessary to keep bad manners and customs from invading and filling the city than it was to keep out infectious diseases.”—Plutarch
ALSO READ Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nations IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own http://www.amazon.com/Hive-Mind-Your-Nation%C2…/…/0804785961
-
The Nobel Prize is an Instrument of Propaganda Supporting Democratic Socialism
[W]ell, the Nobel Prize is awarded for POLITICAL ACTIVISM, not for content. Is her work worthy of a Nobel? Not likely. Is Solzhenitzyn? Maybe. The only Nobel prizes that are not rewarded on the basis of political progressivism are the hard (physical) sciences. The nobel prize is a vehicle for promoting european social democracy. So in this sense, the Nobel prize given to this woman is equivalent to the Russian sponsorship of the Frankfurt School, The Ron Paul Institute, Global Research in Canada, and Russian funding of Muslim terrorists in Europe and America. I have gained enough (limited) understanding of Russian economics and infrastructure to grasp why Putin does what he does. The only problem I have with what he does is (a) expanding Russian influence into eastern Europe, and (b) that they lie about what they’re doing. The reason is that both American experiment has failed, and the Russian experiment has failed. And we both need to contain the barbarians and get our own houses in order, and punish troublemakers rather than try to expand our influence.