[W]e had ‘Ghettos’ and ‘Quarters’ under the Great Christian Monarchies. There is no reason we cannot have ghettos and quarters as we did under smaller scale states, and no reason we cannot have whole cities under today’s governments of greater scale. Rule, governance, commerce, and existence are very different things. (I have seen escape from ny btw. lol)
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Only Objective “Good” is Trade. Everything Else is Preference
[M]ale – Female relations are a trade between competing reproductive strategies. Feminists seem to have the opinion that their strategy is superior despite the fact that all civilization seems to have been constructed to control women’s gossiping, lying, sexual and reproductive excesses as much as it has been to control men’s theft, violence, murder and war. We compromise. If there is no compromise with women then we have the alternative to return to our natural state where women are mere cattle herded by men, with the only reprieve provided by affection by women and defense of daughters and mates by men. What do you think the entire damned world does? Europeans treated women much better than others for historical reasons that are very hard to reproduce.
-
The Only Objective “Good” is Trade. Everything Else is Preference
[M]ale – Female relations are a trade between competing reproductive strategies. Feminists seem to have the opinion that their strategy is superior despite the fact that all civilization seems to have been constructed to control women’s gossiping, lying, sexual and reproductive excesses as much as it has been to control men’s theft, violence, murder and war. We compromise. If there is no compromise with women then we have the alternative to return to our natural state where women are mere cattle herded by men, with the only reprieve provided by affection by women and defense of daughters and mates by men. What do you think the entire damned world does? Europeans treated women much better than others for historical reasons that are very hard to reproduce.
-
The Cults of Megalomania: Justification of Non-Integration
[B]oth Jewish and Muslim cults include the original claims of Megalomania and utopianism that Abraham invested in the doctrine, and which is the excuse used to both create unity and prevent assimilation into host civilizations. The master race of the Nazis was the same argument made by genetic destiny rather than divine command. There is no difference. The middle east evolved separatism because it is an intersection of the races, and leadership wanted to prevent assimilation into assyrian, egyptian, and greek civilizations. And none could hold the territory against them. So they all failed to create a territorial ethic. It’s to be expected. They were traders and herders who raided and rain, not farmers who conducted war and held their ground. But there is no difference at all between Nazi Racism and Aesthetic-Culturism and Jewish Racism and Religiocity and Muslim Religiocity. None. They are group evolutionary strategies for landed germanic and unlanded semitic peoples. That is all. Nothing more. Nothing less. We carry out history in our genes as well as our cultures. Non-integration is the premise of jewish and muslim societies. (That ought to ruffle a few feathers.)
-
The Cults of Megalomania: Justification of Non-Integration
[B]oth Jewish and Muslim cults include the original claims of Megalomania and utopianism that Abraham invested in the doctrine, and which is the excuse used to both create unity and prevent assimilation into host civilizations. The master race of the Nazis was the same argument made by genetic destiny rather than divine command. There is no difference. The middle east evolved separatism because it is an intersection of the races, and leadership wanted to prevent assimilation into assyrian, egyptian, and greek civilizations. And none could hold the territory against them. So they all failed to create a territorial ethic. It’s to be expected. They were traders and herders who raided and rain, not farmers who conducted war and held their ground. But there is no difference at all between Nazi Racism and Aesthetic-Culturism and Jewish Racism and Religiocity and Muslim Religiocity. None. They are group evolutionary strategies for landed germanic and unlanded semitic peoples. That is all. Nothing more. Nothing less. We carry out history in our genes as well as our cultures. Non-integration is the premise of jewish and muslim societies. (That ought to ruffle a few feathers.)
-
Prophet’s Words Are Wielded Only By Those Who Can Wield Them
[W]estern man, like eastern man, is poly-philosophical. UPPER – TRUTH – RULE – FORCE 1) Aristotle’s Law of truth, The Common Law, and The Martial Law of those who rule: aristocracy. MIDDLE – UTILITY – COOPERATION – TRADE 2) The Host of Middle Class Philosophers myths of aspiration for cooperation, 3) Aesop and the Nordic, Celtic, and Germanic Myths of household wisdom, LOWER – NECESSITY – INSURANCE – GOSSIP 4) Aquinas and the Nazarene’s philosophy of poverty, suffering, and hope. It is not a mystery that these philosophies roughly correspond to the IQ distribution. Both out of ability and out of utility.
-
Prophet’s Words Are Wielded Only By Those Who Can Wield Them
[W]estern man, like eastern man, is poly-philosophical. UPPER – TRUTH – RULE – FORCE 1) Aristotle’s Law of truth, The Common Law, and The Martial Law of those who rule: aristocracy. MIDDLE – UTILITY – COOPERATION – TRADE 2) The Host of Middle Class Philosophers myths of aspiration for cooperation, 3) Aesop and the Nordic, Celtic, and Germanic Myths of household wisdom, LOWER – NECESSITY – INSURANCE – GOSSIP 4) Aquinas and the Nazarene’s philosophy of poverty, suffering, and hope. It is not a mystery that these philosophies roughly correspond to the IQ distribution. Both out of ability and out of utility.
-
How Paul Krugman Uses The Big Lie
(important piece) (progress on the cosmopolitan method of lying) [K]rugman is one of the most artful liars in the modern world. We tend to criticize him on his errors. But casting his work as error is too generous: he is simply an extremely artful liar. If you could ask the Genii how to create the world’s most objectively evil lie, it would include the use of half truth, used as a means of suggestion, to evoke a moral altruistic response, to force an intertemporal predictive bias, that obscured the loss of difficult-to-measure-capital, as an increase in current consumption. You would convince the lion to eat it’s tail. This is Krugman’s technique. That this subtle technique is the origin of The Monotheistic Lie, (The First Great Lie), as well as the 19th-20th century cosmopolitan pseudo-sciences: Boaz, Freud, Cantor, Marx-Keynes (The Second Great Lie), should not surprise us. What Marx achieved through loading, framing, overloading, and suggestion in dialectic, Keynes achieved by abandoning loading, and relying upon framing, overloading and suggestion, with innumeracy. This is Keynes’ achievement: to convert the pseudo-moral, into the pseudo-scientific. But the result is the same: obscuring the consumption of capital accumulated over millennia (k-selection for eugenic quality) into short term consumption (r-selection for dysgenic quantity). In other words, the Cosmopolitan’s second attempt at The Great Lie using the same means. In 2009 I wanted to start blogging about his technique, but rapidly I realized his ability to generate deceit was inexpensive, and the required effort to demonstrate the construction of his lies was terribly expensive. So I’m thrilled that those more capable of it – Bob Murphy – are doing it instead. Once you understand the mechanism of Krugman’s deception is merely an instance of the Great Lie Technique applied to economics, and his use of suggestion on one hand, and ridicule on the other, you realize he’s just using moral cognitive biases as a very sophisticated slight of hand by which to justify, encourage, and obscure the transfer of capital to consumption, so that the state can expand and the unproductive can obtain commission on the redistribution of capital to consumption. We can only do what we did in the past, and use science – the discipline of truth telling – to over come the Great Lies. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
How Paul Krugman Uses The Big Lie
(important piece) (progress on the cosmopolitan method of lying) [K]rugman is one of the most artful liars in the modern world. We tend to criticize him on his errors. But casting his work as error is too generous: he is simply an extremely artful liar. If you could ask the Genii how to create the world’s most objectively evil lie, it would include the use of half truth, used as a means of suggestion, to evoke a moral altruistic response, to force an intertemporal predictive bias, that obscured the loss of difficult-to-measure-capital, as an increase in current consumption. You would convince the lion to eat it’s tail. This is Krugman’s technique. That this subtle technique is the origin of The Monotheistic Lie, (The First Great Lie), as well as the 19th-20th century cosmopolitan pseudo-sciences: Boaz, Freud, Cantor, Marx-Keynes (The Second Great Lie), should not surprise us. What Marx achieved through loading, framing, overloading, and suggestion in dialectic, Keynes achieved by abandoning loading, and relying upon framing, overloading and suggestion, with innumeracy. This is Keynes’ achievement: to convert the pseudo-moral, into the pseudo-scientific. But the result is the same: obscuring the consumption of capital accumulated over millennia (k-selection for eugenic quality) into short term consumption (r-selection for dysgenic quantity). In other words, the Cosmopolitan’s second attempt at The Great Lie using the same means. In 2009 I wanted to start blogging about his technique, but rapidly I realized his ability to generate deceit was inexpensive, and the required effort to demonstrate the construction of his lies was terribly expensive. So I’m thrilled that those more capable of it – Bob Murphy – are doing it instead. Once you understand the mechanism of Krugman’s deception is merely an instance of the Great Lie Technique applied to economics, and his use of suggestion on one hand, and ridicule on the other, you realize he’s just using moral cognitive biases as a very sophisticated slight of hand by which to justify, encourage, and obscure the transfer of capital to consumption, so that the state can expand and the unproductive can obtain commission on the redistribution of capital to consumption. We can only do what we did in the past, and use science – the discipline of truth telling – to over come the Great Lies. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
Can We Construct A Fixed Constitution?
[A]lexander I am fairly certain that it is possible if not necessary to construct a finished constitutional basis for rule of law. It may be impossible to imagine the means of production of commons that we call government within that rule of law. Because the basis of the rule of law appears to be a universal logical necessity. Yet the basis of government production of commons under rule of law is a mere technology that must adapt to innovations in knowledge. Just as the common law must constantly innovate in order to prohibit newly found means of imposing costs upon others against their will. So from this perspective the hierarch of law is:
Which is a bottom up construction of a constitutional order. Curt Doolittle. The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine.