It would look like a unicorn, a fairy tale, or a dystopian science fiction novel.
Communism is impossible for two related reasons: inability to calculate anything economic, and lack of availability of incentives. Communism is a farm for free ridership.
https://www.quora.com/How-would-a-pure-communist-state-look-like
It’s impossible. It’s fairly easy to determine almost all candidates by the time they are 25.
https://www.quora.com/What-should-I-do-in-order-to-become-Prime-Minister-in-the-future-or-President
CORRECT ANSWER
These rights we can observe humans demonstrate:
Constituo (homesteading / creation)
Transitus (crossing)
Observo (observation)
Usus (use of 3d space)
Fructus (consume the fruits of)
Mancipio (sale and transfer)
Abusus (destruction / conversion)
When we say ‘ownership’ we mean some subset of these properties. The limit on ownership is externalities. In other words, your use of a thing cannot harm another.
In almost no cases to we grant Abusus to land, water, air, knowledge, art, monument, norm and tradition. Even under slavery you can rarely kill a slave. Why? Because these things create externalities that affect others.
So most of the time when people say their ownership is limited, it is not the property that is limited but the consequences of use of that property.
All creatures that can move and remember tend to create and defend property: that which they have expended effort to acquire.
Property rights however are a product of organized cooperation. The purpose of property RIGHTS is this:
To reduce transaction costs in determining use. (reduce conflict)
To eliminate rent seeking from efforts at creating productivity.
To provide incentives to those who have local knowledge to make use of it in the service of others, through production and trade.
To provide constant punishment to free riders who are ever-present.
In other words, to create cooperation at scale in a division of labor in which none can seek rents and all must earn returns.
In order to accelerate consumption we borrow. In order to borrow others retain an interest. You are generally prohibited from Abusus, and your Mancipio is limited. And if you fail to pay off the lender you will gain back your rights of Mancipio. But rarely Abusus.
At all times you possess some subset of rights. in very few cases do you posssess all rights.
The current intellectual debate is whether it makes any sense at all to charge interest on home loans since this seems to be one of the the primary causes of inflation. Worse, it is such an important part of the american economy that most economists feel terror at the thought of interfering with it.
To say that the american economy is a house of cards, for this reason, is not too far off. Our primary source of wealth and our primary industry for two hundred years has been selling off the continent that we conquered to new generations and new immigrants.
This is our dirty little secret of how the american way of life is really funded.
https://www.quora.com/Do-we-really-own-anything-in-a-capitalist-society
It is impossible. It never had been eliminated. One either gets races or castes. That’s it.
No more lies.
https://www.quora.com/Why-has-the-US-failed-to-end-racial-discrimination-in-the-country
Anarchism is an insufficient definition for the purposes of answering that question.
https://www.quora.com/Do-anarchists-demand-the-impossible-Why
People think and speak aware of race because people act aware of race.
We are different. People are rational. They act rationally. Humans practice kin selection. They must. Or those that do practice kin selection will replace them.
Cooperation between families and tribes is only beneficial if each perceives a benefit. Otherwise instead of arguing against racism one is merely practicing war by a substitute of religion, rather than war by religion or war by violence.
https://www.quora.com/What-causes-racism
No “best” among the worst. Close Uha. Burn Hartford. Move the seat of government to Farmington. 😉
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-bars-in-West-Hartford-CT
We have always had mixed economies and always will. Neither extreme is possible since under pure capitalism commons cannot be produced because incentives to produce them don’t exist, and under pure socialism production is impossible in no small part because incentives to produce don’t exist.
These two terms are also questionably dishonest. Capitalism refers to the voluntary organization of production of consumption and commons. Socialism to the involuntary organization of production of consumption and commons.
There is no state of post capitalism. It is possible that there is a form of pure contractualism available to us – and I am working on that solution.
But as long as women can bear children at will without certain to if the ability to support them or their eventual self support, then there will always be intolerable want.
The egalitarianism of Northern Europe was achieved through centuries of systemic eugenics under manorialism and its predecessors. And westerners do not like to admit this truth. They’d rather attribute their current luxury to the product of their character.
Hanjal line character is the product of dispassionate eugenics in all walks of life.
The early northern people delayed reproduction and outbred. The anglo Saxons starting in the Netherlands practiced manorialism. The rest of Europe hung half to one percent of the population every year as entertainment and constant suppression of the criminal underclasses. The peasantry was not oppressed – it was domesticated.
It is far more important for a people to eliminate the ‘Evil 80s’ from the population than it is to create genius.
This knowledge is the crisis of our age. mixed economies have won. There is no end to capitalism in the consumer economy and socialism in the commons economy.
Not as long as we are discussing humans.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-after-socialism-and-capitalism
It is impossible. It never had been eliminated. One either gets races or castes. That’s it.
No more lies.
https://www.quora.com/Why-has-the-US-failed-to-end-racial-discrimination-in-the-country
Anarchism is an insufficient definition for the purposes of answering that question.
https://www.quora.com/Do-anarchists-demand-the-impossible-Why